The decision in the case of: Tooth & Co v Laws (1888) 9 LR (NSW) 154 was based on the fact that:
A) The dealings of the secretary appeared to be within the scope of their authority even though they lacked actual authority.
B) The defendant's previous conduct in paying for the jewellery amounted to a representation of the agent's authority.
C) The defendant's failure to notify the suppliers of the sale of business prohibited him from denying that the purchasers were his agents.
D) Buying and selling cars was a normal practice of that kind of business.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: The law presumes that a spouse has
Q16: Ratification by a principal of an unauthorised
Q22: In which of the following cases did
Q26: Agency is a contractual relationship.
Q28: What do you think is the rationale
Q32: The notion of 'apparent authority' means that
Q33: Which of the following best describes an
Q39: Which of the following is an example
Q40: In which of the following cases did
Q43: An agent can sue for breach of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents