The decision in Forster & Sons Ltd v Suggett (1918) 35 TLR 87 was based on the fact that:
A) The restraint of trade clause was an unreasonable exercise of the employer's superior bargaining power.
B) The restraint of trade clause was a reasonable protection of the employer's proprietary interest.
C) The restraint of trade clause was imposed merely to restrict competition.
D) Arms length bargaining with legal advice on both sides meant there was no inequality of bargaining power.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: A contract deemed illegal when it is
Q3: Why were the contracts enforced by the
Q5: The most significant difference between a 'void'
Q6: A contract that is legal when it
Q7: A term in a contract that attempts
Q8: Which of the following is NOT a
Q9: A clause in a contract which provides
Q10: To determine if a contract is illegal
Q10: In which of the following cases did
Q16: Which of the following cases is authority
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents