What was wrong with Norman Cousins's claim that humor and vitamins could cure life-threatening diseases?
A)it was not falsifiable
B)it was not based on empirical evidence
C)its variables were not operationally defined
D)it resulted from confirmation bias

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Norman Cousins's claim that humor and vitamins could cure life-threatening diseases was not based on empirical evidence. This means that there was no scientific evidence to support his claim, and it could not be verified through scientific methods. Therefore, the claim lacked the necessary evidence to be considered valid or reliable.

What Was Wrong with Norman Cousins's Claim That Humor and Vitamins