Which of the following was the result in Sandra Morris v. Walmart Stores, Inc., the case in the text in which the plaintiff sued the defendant after slipping in water allegedly from a freezer?
A) That the plaintiff could not recover because she had no evidence that the defendant had knowledge of the dangerous condition prior to her fall.
B) That the plaintiff could not recover because she could had no evidence disputing the defendant's claim that a customer spilled the liquid in which she fell.
C) That the plaintiff could recover on the basis of negligence per se.
D) That the plaintiff could rely on the theory of res ipsa loquitur.
E) That the defendant was entitled to a judgment in its favor because the plaintiff could not establish that the defendant in general allowed dangerous conditions to exist in its stores.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Simply offering a better deal is not
Q10: Good Samaritan statutes impose liability upon people
Q16: Tort law is primarily state law.
Q17: When negligence per se applies, the plaintiff
Q20: Punitive damage awards in Japan are common
Q22: Which of the following may a person
Q25: Which of the following is true regarding
Q34: _ torts occur when the defendant acts
Q37: _ torts occur when the defendant takes
Q45: A person who commits a tort is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents