In Wood V NBA (1987), the Court Ruled That the NBA's Salary

In Wood v. NBA (1987) , the court ruled that the NBA's salary cap and draft rules did not violate antitrust laws because:

A) The salary cap and draft did not significantly restrain trade.
B) The NBA did not have a monopoly on the purchase of basketball talent as other leagues existed where players could be compensated for playing basketball including European professional leagues and American colleges and universities.
C) The NBA was not subject to antitrust laws due to the nonstatutory labor exemption.
D) All of the above.