As U.S.-based organizations move into developing countries, they are no longer subject to U.S. employment law and the strict standards that would be required for the equivalent operation in the States and overhead and operating expenses are a fraction of what a State-side location's would be. Even with low pay and harsh working conditions, they find workers eager to fill positions, and that doesn't incentivize improvements in the working conditions. With competition driving down prices in the U.S. while costs are holding steady or rising, the trend has been to relocate manufacturing facilities and even some service centers from the US. to developing countries. There are obvious economic incentives in the reduced operating and labor costs, and the potential for tax breaks and incentives from the host country's government can make offshoring more attractive. Despite the economic benefits, there is evidence that should serve as a cautionary tale. What provides a warning that this is not a good practice to continue?
A) Economic sustainability
B) It is unethical
C) Countries are mandating work standards
D) Tragedy of the commons
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: The ethical mandate for CSR is focused
Q16: You are having trouble deciding between four
Q17: Which of the following contains the argument
Q18: The business case for CSR justifies initiatives
Q19: After hearing about CSR and its benefits,
Q20: What is the major criticism of the
Q22: Which would be most prominent in an
Q23: How can you determine whether the CSR
Q24: Which of the following is true of
Q25: An organization is committed to various CSR
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents