Lipstik,Inc.makes cosmetics.Lipstik intentionally mislabels its packaged products to conceal a defect.Trusting and relying on the mislabeling,Mikayla buys a Lipstik product and suffers an injury.Lipstik is most likely liable for

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Lipstik intentionally mislabeled its products with the intent to deceive consumers, which constitutes fraud. Mikayla suffered an injury as a result of relying on the mislabeling, making Lipstik liable for the harm caused. Product misuse, privity, and puffery do not apply in this scenario.