In Baxstrom V.Herold,the Supreme Court Held That

In Baxstrom v.Herold,the Supreme Court held that

A) holding offenders in a mental institute after their sentences are complete is a violation of the equal protection clause.
B) releasing defendants before their sentences are complete puts an unnecessary risk upon society.
C) confining individuals to a mental institute equals cruel and unusual punishment.
D) civil commitments of offenders,after they have served their sentence,are unconstitutional.