Proof of aiding and abetting another person's securities violation is not sufficient misconduct to overcome the privity requirement of Securities Act Section 12(a)(2).

Name: Proof of aiding and abetting another person's securities violation is not sufficient misconduct to overcome the privity requirement of Securities Act Section 12(a)(2).
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.9 (50 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Professionals who merely aid and abet a client's Section 12(a)(2)violation of the Securities Act of 1933 will not have liability for damages under Section 12(a)(2).

Proof of Aiding and Abetting Another Person's Securities Violation Is