Lane was employed by the county as the public assistance coordinator. She was fired after her office was searched by her supervisor. Her supervisor claimed that she searched the office looking for evidence that Lane was engaged in food stamp fraud.
A) Lane's 4th Amendment rights have been violated because the search was per se unreasonable.
B) Lane has no recourse because her employer had reasonable grounds to suspect the search would reveal that she was engaged in food stamp fraud.
C) Lane can file an action based on the Privacy Act.
D) Lane can file a claim based on invasion of privacy.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: John was Brad's supervisor. He was angry
Q22: For which of the following does Josh,
Q23: The USA PATRIOT Act
A) gives the federal
Q24: Rosalie is an employee of High &
Q25: Under the Privacy Act of 1974:
A) an
Q27: Roger Greenberg was fired after being accused
Q28: Legal counsel advised the president of the
Q29: As a condition of being allowed to
Q30: Someone claiming to be an employee of
Q31: Cedric is an employee of Zeus Electronic
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents