Explain the significance of the United States Supreme Court decision in Garcetti,et al.v.Ceballos in relation to whistleblowers.
• The Unites State Supreme Court holds that (Garcetti,et al.v.Ceballos,2006)): "When public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties,they are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes,and the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline."
• Therefore,government employees who are in a position to have direct knowledge and an applied understanding of misconduct do not always have freedom of speech.They are contractually bound to report such violations strictly within their chain of command and are also contractually bound to refrain from speech that harms the image or effectiveness of their agency.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q8: Whistleblower describes someone who reports misconduct within
Q9: The suggested reform to assist the would-be
Q10: Government employees are protected when exercising freedom
Q11: The whistleblower in the criminal justice system
Q12: Which of the following is not a
Q14: Whistleblower protection is theoretical.
Q15: Which of the following is not identified
Q16: The term whistleblower references only those who
Q17: Judges are required to report misconduct by
Q18: The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act was signed
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents