In 1951,George purchased a piece of property in a cottage resort area.The property was subject to a restrictive covenant running with the land until August 1,2001,that the property shall never be sold,assigned,transferred,or leased to any person born in the State of Israel.In January 2002,George entered into an agreement of purchase and sale with another individual.The purchaser through his solicitor submitted the following requisition on title: "in view of the fact that the purchaser herein was born in the State of Israel,I require a release from the restrictions imposed on the land,and the restrictive covenant struck out,void and of no effect." George was only too happy to provide this release;however,an adjoining landowner wished to enforce the restrictive covenant.Together George and his purchaser made an application to the courts to have the restrictive covenants struck down as against public policy.Discuss the issues raised in this case,from a perspective of the 1950s and the perspective of today,and render a reasoned decision.Regardless of your answer,if the covenant was upheld,suggest an alternative way this sale may be effected without violating the covenant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q43: Jamil and Kevin purchase a residential property
Q44: Does the legal idiom "possession is nine-tenths
Q130: Describe the major ways in which commercial
Q131: Illustrate by example the use of mortgage
Q133: The landlord would be obligated to rectify
Q134: The Elegant Gift Shop had been a
Q136: Explain the concept of "part-lot control."
Q138: Aunt Moira lent $25,000 to her nephew
Q139: Discuss the application of the Statute of
Q140: Explain the difficulties faced by the songwriter
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents