Alan entered into a written contract for the purchase of a house owned by Joe . But as the time to move approached, Alan discovered that Joe was refusing to move out and refusing to transfer the property. Apparently a dissatisfied customer had driven through the showroom window of Joe's new car dealership causing him considerable expense. Joe could no longer afford to purchase the new luxury home in Langley to which he had intended to move. Which of the following is the appropriate remedy in these circumstances for Alan, who really wants the house?
A) Injunction
B) Damages
C) Specific performance
D) Rescission
E) No remedy

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appropriate remedy in this case would be specific performance, which would require Joe to still transfer the property to Alan according to the terms of their contract. The fact that Joe can no longer afford to purchase a new luxury home is not a valid excuse for him to breach their contract.

Alan Entered into a Written Contract for the Purchase of a House