The case of Shelanu Inc. v. Print Three Franchising Corporation involved a case whether a franchisor had a duty of good faith to the franchisee. What did the Court of Appeal hold?
A) The breach was considered inconsequential at law.
B) The plaintiff was not entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since the franchisor had not breached their duty of good faith.
C) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since the franchisor had breached their duty of good faith.
D) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since there was no breach of the duty of good faith.
E) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since there was a breach of the duty of good faith.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement because the franchisor had breached their duty of good faith.

The Case of Shelanu Inc