Which of the following is true with regard to the intention of the parties to an agreement to enter into a legal relationship? Where appropriate, assume that all the other elements necessary to form a contract are present.
A) The court makes presumptions about the intention of parties to be bound, whether that presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary, makes no difference to the court.
B) Since family matters are private matters, an agreement between a husband and wife to transfer property from the husband to the wife could not be a contract even if all the other elements of a contract were present.
C) An intention to be legally bound is not a necessary element of a contract.
D) The court will presume there is always an intent to be legally bound in family situations.
E) Parties may expressly state their intention to be legally bound, in which case the court need not rely on presumptions.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which one of the following categories of
Q2: Clem had wanted a piano for a
Q3: Which of the following is incorrect with
Q4: In British Columbia, which of the following
Q6: All of the following contracts would be
Q7: In his last year of high school,
Q8: Joe was in a bar and saw
Q9: A provision in a contract for the
Q10: Which one of the following is an
Q11: In jurisdictions other than British Columbia, which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents