The contract signed by XYZ Ltd. and Charles provided that the company would receive a licence to use the computer program that Charles was creating, that Charles would complete the program by January 15, 2012, that Charles would retain copyright, and that Charles would receive $10,000 on completion of his work. Two weeks before the due date, Charles told the president of the company that he was not going to complete on time. The president said, "Don't worry about it; get it done as soon as you can." Charles was 10 days late in completing the work. The delay caused the company to lose money, so it sued Charles for damages. On these facts (which you should assume can be proved) , which of the following is false?
A) Charles could use equitable (promissory) estoppel as a defence.
B) The company has the right to sue even though it is not a natural person.
C) If this case were heard in the B.C. Supreme Court, the judge would have to follow a precedent on the point set by the B.C. Court of Appeal.
D) Charles could enter his defence and could also enter a counterclaim if he felt he had an action against the company.
E) The company doesn't have the right to sue because the law would presume that the parties did not intend to be legally bound.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: In Transport North American Express Inc. v.
Q54: In Royal Bank of Canada v. Holoboff,
Q55: Negotiations between Dave and Mary resulted in
Q56: In Ascent Financial Services Ltd. v. Blythman,
Q57: In which of the following situations would
Q59: Zlotnik incorporated a company shortly after graduation.
Q60: (Modify this question for your jurisdiction.) Bill,
Q62: Neither party is bound by a contract
Q63: Which of the following best describes an
Q72: The nature of the legislation governing incorporation
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents