Two real estate agents, pressed for time, stopped at the bakery for some muffins that would suffice as lunch. John bought the muffins and gave one to Mary. They both began to eat the muffins as they hurried to the car. When Mary looked at the muffin she had just bitten, she saw that the raisins had little worms in them. John's muffins were the same with little worms. Based on these facts, which of the following possibilities is true? (Read each independently from the others.)
A) Mary can do nothing as she did not purchase the muffins.
B) If Mary sued the baker of the muffins or the packer of the raisins, she would have to prove only one thing to win her case that there were worms in the muffin.
C) Mary has a cause of action against the baker of the muffins only if she can prove that the baker used bad raisins on purpose.
D) Even if Mary was not injured by eating the worms, she could sue the baker of the muffins for nuisance.
E) Since Mary did not buy the muffins, she could not sue in contract, but if she were injured, she could sue in tort.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: As a result of careless driving, Mr.
Q8: Sarah Iris, a middle-aged woman, was struck
Q9: In Cooper v. Hobart, the issue was
Q10: Which of the following situations could not
Q11: Which of the following situations could result
Q13: Which of the following is true with
Q14: People who see a child drowning have
Q15: A seventy-year-old woman, using the escalator at
Q16: In Hall v. Hebert, an individual was
Q17: Raheel wants to sue a manufacturer who
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents