In CASE 7.2,Kurashige v.Indian Dunes,Inc.(1988),plaintiff Kurashige used Indian Dunes Park for motorcycle dirt bike riding.Prior to entering the park he signed a general release.Kurashige was injured and sued Indian Dunes.How did the court rule and why?
A) For the defendant,holding that the release was not unconscionable,and that all the risk was on the plaintiff.
B) For the plaintiff,holding that the release was unconscionable,and that all the risk was on the defendant.
C) For the defendant,holding that the release was enforceable,and that plaintiff should have been insured.
D) For the plaintiff,because the release was enforceable based on the plaintiff's age in that he could not legally contract.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court ruled in favor of the defendant, holding that the release was not unconscionable and that all the risk was on the plaintiff. The court found that the release was clearly worded and that Kurashige had knowingly and voluntarily assumed the risks associated with dirt bike riding. Additionally, the court noted that Kurashige had ample opportunity to read and understand the terms of the release. Therefore, the release was considered valid and enforceable.

In CASE 72,Kurashige V