CASE 4.3 Brown v.Entertainment Merchants Association (2011) involved the issue of whether a California statute could prohibit the sale or rental of graphically violent video games to minors.What was the ruling of the U.S.Supreme Court?
A) The law was valid because the video games did not qualify for First Amendment protection.
B) The law was valid because minors are not entitled to First Amendment protection.
C) The law was invalid because the state could not establish a rational basis for it.
D) The law was invalid because the state could not satisfy the strict scrutiny test applied.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: Racist speech is protected by the First
Q21: In contrast to the federal government,state governments
Q22: Laws that punish actions that were not
Q23: The central Fourth Amendment question in the
Q24: Based on various Supreme Court rulings,provisions in
Q26: In the case United States v.Morrison referenced
Q27: Which of the following guarantees of individual
Q28: In order to hold a media defendant
Q29: _ gives the president a type of
Q30: The Fifth Amendment does NOT contain which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents