expand icon
book The Living World 8th Edition by George Johnson cover

The Living World 8th Edition by George Johnson

النسخة 8الرقم المعياري الدولي: 978-0078024214
book The Living World 8th Edition by George Johnson cover

The Living World 8th Edition by George Johnson

النسخة 8الرقم المعياري الدولي: 978-0078024214
تمرين 4
What Causes New Forms to Arise?
Biologists once presumed that new forms -genera, families, and orders-arose most often during times of massive geological disturbance, stimulated by the resulting environmental changes. But no such relationship exists. An alternative hypothesis was proposed by evolutionist George Simpson in 1953. He proposed that diversification followed new evolutionary innovations, "inventions" that permitted an organism to occupy a new "adaptive zone." After a burst of new orders that define the major groups, subsequent specialization would lead to new genera.
The early bony fishes, typified by the sturgeon (see lower right ), had feeble jaws and long shark-like tails. They dominated the Devonian (the Age of Fishes), to be replaced in the Triassic (the period when dinosaurs appeared) by fishes like the gar pike with a shorter more powerful jaw that improved feeding and a shortened more maneuverable tail that improved locomotion. They were in turn replaced by teleost fishes like the perch, with an even better tail for fast, maneuverable swimming, and a complex mouth with a mobile upper jaw that slides forward as the mouth opens.
This history allows a clear test of Simpson's hypothesis. Was the appearance of these three orders followed by a burst of evolution as Simpson predicts, the new innovations in feeding and locomotion opening wide the door of opportunity? If so, many new genera should be seen in the fossil record soon after the appearance of each new order. If not, the pattern of when new genera appear should not track the appearance of new orders.
The graph shows the evolutionary history of the class Osteichthyes, the bony fishes, since they first appeared in the Silurian some 420 million years ago. What Causes New Forms to Arise?  Biologists once presumed that new forms -genera, families, and orders-arose most often during times of massive geological disturbance, stimulated by the resulting environmental changes. But no such relationship exists. An alternative hypothesis was proposed by evolutionist George Simpson in 1953. He proposed that diversification followed new evolutionary innovations, inventions that permitted an organism to occupy a new adaptive zone. After a burst of new orders that define the major groups, subsequent specialization would lead to new genera. The early bony fishes, typified by the sturgeon (see lower right ), had feeble jaws and long shark-like tails. They dominated the Devonian (the Age of Fishes), to be replaced in the Triassic (the period when dinosaurs appeared) by fishes like the gar pike with a shorter more powerful jaw that improved feeding and a shortened more maneuverable tail that improved locomotion. They were in turn replaced by teleost fishes like the perch, with an even better tail for fast, maneuverable swimming, and a complex mouth with a mobile upper jaw that slides forward as the mouth opens. This history allows a clear test of Simpson's hypothesis. Was the appearance of these three orders followed by a burst of evolution as Simpson predicts, the new innovations in feeding and locomotion opening wide the door of opportunity? If so, many new genera should be seen in the fossil record soon after the appearance of each new order. If not, the pattern of when new genera appear should not track the appearance of new orders. The graph shows the evolutionary history of the class Osteichthyes, the bony fishes, since they first appeared in the Silurian some 420 million years ago.          Further Analysis If you were to plot on the graph the rate at which new families of fishes appeared, what general pattern would you expect to see, relative to new orders, if Simpson is right? Explain. What Causes New Forms to Arise?  Biologists once presumed that new forms -genera, families, and orders-arose most often during times of massive geological disturbance, stimulated by the resulting environmental changes. But no such relationship exists. An alternative hypothesis was proposed by evolutionist George Simpson in 1953. He proposed that diversification followed new evolutionary innovations, inventions that permitted an organism to occupy a new adaptive zone. After a burst of new orders that define the major groups, subsequent specialization would lead to new genera. The early bony fishes, typified by the sturgeon (see lower right ), had feeble jaws and long shark-like tails. They dominated the Devonian (the Age of Fishes), to be replaced in the Triassic (the period when dinosaurs appeared) by fishes like the gar pike with a shorter more powerful jaw that improved feeding and a shortened more maneuverable tail that improved locomotion. They were in turn replaced by teleost fishes like the perch, with an even better tail for fast, maneuverable swimming, and a complex mouth with a mobile upper jaw that slides forward as the mouth opens. This history allows a clear test of Simpson's hypothesis. Was the appearance of these three orders followed by a burst of evolution as Simpson predicts, the new innovations in feeding and locomotion opening wide the door of opportunity? If so, many new genera should be seen in the fossil record soon after the appearance of each new order. If not, the pattern of when new genera appear should not track the appearance of new orders. The graph shows the evolutionary history of the class Osteichthyes, the bony fishes, since they first appeared in the Silurian some 420 million years ago.          Further Analysis If you were to plot on the graph the rate at which new families of fishes appeared, what general pattern would you expect to see, relative to new orders, if Simpson is right? Explain. What Causes New Forms to Arise?  Biologists once presumed that new forms -genera, families, and orders-arose most often during times of massive geological disturbance, stimulated by the resulting environmental changes. But no such relationship exists. An alternative hypothesis was proposed by evolutionist George Simpson in 1953. He proposed that diversification followed new evolutionary innovations, inventions that permitted an organism to occupy a new adaptive zone. After a burst of new orders that define the major groups, subsequent specialization would lead to new genera. The early bony fishes, typified by the sturgeon (see lower right ), had feeble jaws and long shark-like tails. They dominated the Devonian (the Age of Fishes), to be replaced in the Triassic (the period when dinosaurs appeared) by fishes like the gar pike with a shorter more powerful jaw that improved feeding and a shortened more maneuverable tail that improved locomotion. They were in turn replaced by teleost fishes like the perch, with an even better tail for fast, maneuverable swimming, and a complex mouth with a mobile upper jaw that slides forward as the mouth opens. This history allows a clear test of Simpson's hypothesis. Was the appearance of these three orders followed by a burst of evolution as Simpson predicts, the new innovations in feeding and locomotion opening wide the door of opportunity? If so, many new genera should be seen in the fossil record soon after the appearance of each new order. If not, the pattern of when new genera appear should not track the appearance of new orders. The graph shows the evolutionary history of the class Osteichthyes, the bony fishes, since they first appeared in the Silurian some 420 million years ago.          Further Analysis If you were to plot on the graph the rate at which new families of fishes appeared, what general pattern would you expect to see, relative to new orders, if Simpson is right? Explain. What Causes New Forms to Arise?  Biologists once presumed that new forms -genera, families, and orders-arose most often during times of massive geological disturbance, stimulated by the resulting environmental changes. But no such relationship exists. An alternative hypothesis was proposed by evolutionist George Simpson in 1953. He proposed that diversification followed new evolutionary innovations, inventions that permitted an organism to occupy a new adaptive zone. After a burst of new orders that define the major groups, subsequent specialization would lead to new genera. The early bony fishes, typified by the sturgeon (see lower right ), had feeble jaws and long shark-like tails. They dominated the Devonian (the Age of Fishes), to be replaced in the Triassic (the period when dinosaurs appeared) by fishes like the gar pike with a shorter more powerful jaw that improved feeding and a shortened more maneuverable tail that improved locomotion. They were in turn replaced by teleost fishes like the perch, with an even better tail for fast, maneuverable swimming, and a complex mouth with a mobile upper jaw that slides forward as the mouth opens. This history allows a clear test of Simpson's hypothesis. Was the appearance of these three orders followed by a burst of evolution as Simpson predicts, the new innovations in feeding and locomotion opening wide the door of opportunity? If so, many new genera should be seen in the fossil record soon after the appearance of each new order. If not, the pattern of when new genera appear should not track the appearance of new orders. The graph shows the evolutionary history of the class Osteichthyes, the bony fishes, since they first appeared in the Silurian some 420 million years ago.          Further Analysis If you were to plot on the graph the rate at which new families of fishes appeared, what general pattern would you expect to see, relative to new orders, if Simpson is right? Explain.
Further Analysis If you were to plot on the graph the rate at which new families of fishes appeared, what general pattern would you expect to see, relative to new orders, if Simpson is right? Explain.
التوضيح
موثّق
like image
like image

New forms arise due to modifications occ...

close menu
The Living World 8th Edition by George Johnson
cross icon