تكلم مع الذكاء الاصطناعي
Cengage Advantage Books: Business Law 13th Edition by Roger LeRoy Miller
النسخة 13الرقم المعياري الدولي: 978-1305087859Cengage Advantage Books: Business Law 13th Edition by Roger LeRoy Miller
النسخة 13الرقم المعياري الدولي: 978-1305087859 تمرين 12
BUSINESS Case Problem with Sample Answer: Consequential Damages.
![BUSINESS Case Problem with Sample Answer: Consequential Damages. After submitting the high bid at a foreclosure sale, David Simard entered into a contract to purchase real property in Maryland for $192,000. Simard defaulted (failed to pay) on the contract. A state court ordered the property to be resold at Simard's expense, as required by state law. The property was then resold for $163,000, but the second purchaser also defaulted on his contract. The court then ordered a second resale, resulting in a final price of $130,000. Assuming that Simard is liable for consequential damages, what is the extent of his liability? Is he liable for losses and expenses related to the first resale? If so, is he also liable for losses and expenses related to the second resale? Why or why not? [ Burson v. Simard, 35 A.3d 1154 (Md. 2012)]](https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/SM2134/11eb9f6d_0712_3f97_b540_6be2493d4974_SM2134_00.jpg)
After submitting the high bid at a foreclosure sale, David Simard entered into a contract to purchase real property in Maryland for $192,000. Simard defaulted (failed to pay) on the contract. A state court ordered the property to be resold at Simard's expense, as required by state law. The property was then resold for $163,000, but the second purchaser also defaulted on his contract. The court then ordered a second resale, resulting in a final price of $130,000. Assuming that Simard is liable for consequential damages, what is the extent of his liability? Is he liable for losses and expenses related to the first resale? If so, is he also liable for losses and expenses related to the second resale? Why or why not? [ Burson v. Simard, 35 A.3d 1154 (Md. 2012)]
After submitting the high bid at a foreclosure sale, David Simard entered into a contract to purchase real property in Maryland for $192,000. Simard defaulted (failed to pay) on the contract. A state court ordered the property to be resold at Simard's expense, as required by state law. The property was then resold for $163,000, but the second purchaser also defaulted on his contract. The court then ordered a second resale, resulting in a final price of $130,000. Assuming that Simard is liable for consequential damages, what is the extent of his liability? Is he liable for losses and expenses related to the first resale? If so, is he also liable for losses and expenses related to the second resale? Why or why not? [ Burson v. Simard, 35 A.3d 1154 (Md. 2012)]
التوضيح
موثّق
موثّق
The following are the facts associated w...
Cengage Advantage Books: Business Law 13th Edition by Roger LeRoy Miller
لماذا لم يعجبك هذا التمرين؟
أخرى 8 أحرف كحد أدنى و 255 حرفاً كحد أقصى
حرف 255
