Question 1

Minimum wage is justifiable because .&#10;A)it helps to prevent worker exploitation&#10;B)it is higher than a living wage&#10;C)it redistributes income with the middle class as its primary focus&#10;D)it is the most efficient way to raise income for poor workers

Accepted Answer

Minimum wage helps prevent worker exploitation by setting a floor for wages that employers must pay, which ensures that workers are paid a fair wage for their work. Without minimum wage laws, employers could potentially pay workers very low wages, which would be a form of exploitation.

Question 2

People are sometimes afraid to express their views at work because .&#10;A)it may be against the law&#10;B)they do not want to stand out&#10;C)they are afraid of what others might think&#10;D)they are afraid of losing their jobs

Accepted Answer

People are often afraid to express their views at work because they fear that they could be fired for speaking out. This can be especially true if their views are different from those of their superiors or if they go against the company's culture or policies.

Question 3

Workplaces are &#34;democratic&#34; insofar as .&#10;A)companies are structured like democracies&#10;B)workers are represented in company decisions&#10;C)companies are not arranged hierarchically&#10;D)companies are not headed by a single individual

Accepted Answer

A democratic workplace is one where workers have a voice in company decisions and are represented in decision-making processes. This means that workers have the opportunity to give feedback, suggest changes, and participate in discussions about company policies and practices. While some companies may be structured in a more democratic way (such as cooperatives), it is not necessary for a company to have a non-hierarchical structure or be led by a collective in order to be democratic.

Question 4

Ethical arguments for democracy in the workplace are mainly based on .&#10;A)productivity&#10;B)organizational effectiveness&#10;C)personalhealth&#10;D)legitimizingpower

Accepted Answer

The ethical arguments for democracy in the workplace are mainly based on legitimizing power. This means that the power should come from the people who are affected by the decisions, and not just from those who hold formal authority. In a democratic workplace, decisions are made through collective decision-making processes where everyone has a say in the outcome. This can lead to a more just and equitable workplace, where the interests of all stakeholders are taken into account.

Question 5

The Supreme Court has found that government workers .&#10;A)have a right to free speech about job-related matters&#10;B)cannot speak to the public about their jobs&#10;C)have unlimited free speech since they are government workers&#10;D)have different free speech rights from other employees

Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court has held that government workers have a right to free speech about job-related matters. This right is somewhat limited and may be subject to certain restrictions depending on the context of the speech and the government's interest in regulating it.

Question 6

Proponents of minimum wage who argue that extremely low wages are exploitative assume that .&#10;A)employers have no choice but to offer low wages&#10;B)jobs with other levels of wages are available&#10;C)employers could offer the same jobs at higher wages&#10;D)workers will not take just any job they can get

Accepted Answer

Proponents of minimum wage argue that extremely low wages are exploitative under the assumption that employers have the capability to offer the same jobs at higher wages but choose not to. This perspective is based on the belief that fairer, more livable wages could be provided, making the argument for raising the minimum wage to prevent exploitation.

Question 7

The argument for property rights in labor assumes that .&#10;A)a worker has the rights to his/her labor&#10;B)an employer has the rights to its employees' time&#10;C)an employer has the rights to its employees' labor&#10;D)an employer can regulate its employees' use of time

Accepted Answer

The argument for property rights in labor assumes that a worker has the rights to his/her labor, meaning that they have control over their own time and can choose how they use it. It rejects the idea that an employer has the rights to its employees' time or labor, as this would suggest that the employer can dictate how the employee uses their own time and skills. The argument also does not address whether or not an employer can regulate their employees' use of time, but rather focuses on the fundamental right of workers to control their own labor.

Question 8

The notion of due process can be used to argue against employment at will because .&#10;A)employees should own the products of their labor&#10;B)employment at will can be arbitrary&#10;C)property rights are most fundamental&#10;D)due process requires a written contract

Accepted Answer

Due process requires fairness and some sort of legal protection for employees, including protection against arbitrary dismissal. Employment at will allows for arbitrary dismissal without any protection for the employee, which goes against the principles of due process.

Question 9

&#34;Employment at will&#34; means that .&#10;A)a worker can choose his or her job&#10;B)an employee can leave the company any time&#10;C)an employer can release an employee at any time&#10;D)a worker has rights to the products of his or her labor

Accepted Answer

"Employment at will" means that an employer has the right to terminate an employee without cause or notice. Therefore, option C is the correct choice. Options A, B, and D are incorrect because they do not accurately reflect the meaning of "employment at will."

Question 10

The utilitarian argument for employment at will relies on the idea that .&#10;A)there is an implicit contract of employment&#10;B)people own the products of their labor&#10;C)employers and employees both benefit from it&#10;D)employees have the right to freedom of expression

Accepted Answer

The utilitarian argument for employment at will argues that this system benefits both employers and employees as it creates greater flexibility and efficiency in the job market. It allows employers to easily hire and fire employees as needed, and employees are free to leave for better opportunities if they choose to. This promotes competition and ultimately leads to the most efficient allocation of labor resources. Therefore, the argument is based on the idea that both parties benefit from this system.

Deck 8: Employment Rights