Deck 10: Criticisms of Absorption Cost Systems:incentive to Overproduce

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
Federal Mixing
Federal Mixing (FM) is a division of Federal Chemicals, a large diversified chemical company. FM provides mixing services for both outside customers and other Federal divisions. FM buys or receives liquid chemicals and combines and packages them according to the customer's specifications. FM computes its divisional net income on both a fully absorbed and variable costing basis. For the year just ending, it reported Federal Mixing Federal Mixing (FM) is a division of Federal Chemicals, a large diversified chemical company. FM provides mixing services for both outside customers and other Federal divisions. FM buys or receives liquid chemicals and combines and packages them according to the customer's specifications. FM computes its divisional net income on both a fully absorbed and variable costing basis. For the year just ending, it reported   Overhead is assigned to products using machine hours. ?There is no finished goods inventory at FM, only work-in-process (WIP) inventory. As soon as a product is completed, it is shipped to the customer. The beginning inventory was valued at $6.3 million and contained 70,000 machine hours. The ending WIP inventory was valued at $9.9 million and contained 90,000 machine hours. Required: Write a short nontechnical note to senior management explaining why variable costing and absorption costing net income amounts differ.<div style=padding-top: 35px> Overhead is assigned to products using machine hours.
?There is no finished goods inventory at FM, only work-in-process (WIP) inventory. As soon as a product is completed, it is shipped to the customer. The beginning inventory was valued at $6.3 million and contained 70,000 machine hours. The ending WIP inventory was valued at $9.9 million and contained 90,000 machine hours.
Required:
Write a short nontechnical note to senior management explaining why variable costing and absorption costing net income amounts differ.
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
Navisky
Navisky designs, manufactures, and sells specialized GPS (Global Positioning System) devices for commercial applications. For example, Navisky currently sells a system for environmental studies and is planning systems for private aviation and fleet management. The firm has a design team that identifies potential commercial GPS applications, then designs and develops prototypes. Once a prototype is deemed successful and senior management determines that a market exists for the new application, the new design is put into production and the firm markets the new product through independent salespeople, direct marketing, trade shows, or whatever channel is most appropriate for that market.
?Currently, Navisky has one very successful system in production (for environmental studies) and several others in development. Navisky, located in Austria, is one of nine wholly owned subsidiaries of a large Swiss conglomerate. Andreas Hoffman, president of Navisky, expects to retire next year. He receives a fixed salary and a bonus based on reported accounting earnings. The bonus is 5 percent of earnings in excess of €850,000 for actual earnings between €850,000 and €1,400,000. If actual earnings exceed €1,400,000, the bonus is capped at €27,500 (5% × [€1,400,000 - €850,000]). (Earnings, both actual and target, are before taxes.)
?The following data summarize Navisky's current operations (in euros). Navisky Navisky designs, manufactures, and sells specialized GPS (Global Positioning System) devices for commercial applications. For example, Navisky currently sells a system for environmental studies and is planning systems for private aviation and fleet management. The firm has a design team that identifies potential commercial GPS applications, then designs and develops prototypes. Once a prototype is deemed successful and senior management determines that a market exists for the new application, the new design is put into production and the firm markets the new product through independent salespeople, direct marketing, trade shows, or whatever channel is most appropriate for that market. ?Currently, Navisky has one very successful system in production (for environmental studies) and several others in development. Navisky, located in Austria, is one of nine wholly owned subsidiaries of a large Swiss conglomerate. Andreas Hoffman, president of Navisky, expects to retire next year. He receives a fixed salary and a bonus based on reported accounting earnings. The bonus is 5 percent of earnings in excess of €850,000 for actual earnings between €850,000 and €1,400,000. If actual earnings exceed €1,400,000, the bonus is capped at €27,500 (5% × [€1,400,000 - €850,000]). (Earnings, both actual and target, are before taxes.) ?The following data summarize Navisky's current operations (in euros).   ?Senior management at Navisky, including Mr. Hoffman, expects to sell about 1,200 units of the environmental GPS device this year. However, they have considerable discretion in setting production levels. Their plant has excess capacity and can produce up to 1,500 environmental devices without seeing any increase in the variable manufacturing costs per unit. ?Navisky uses a traditional absorption costing system to absorb manufacturing overhead into product costs for inventory valuation and to calculate earnings for internal compensation purposes as well as external reporting. At the beginning of the current fiscal year, there was no beginning inventory of the environmental GPS devices. Required: a. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see Navisky produce if he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year? b. Suppose Mr. Hoffman's bonus calculation was based on net income after including a charge for inventory holding costs at 20 percent of the ending inventory value. In other words, his bonus is 5 percent of net income in excess of €850,000 up to €1,400,000 where net income includes a 20 percent inventory holding cost. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see produced if he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year? c. Explain why your answers in parts (b) and (c) differ, if they do. d. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see produced assuming he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year if Navisky's net income is calculated using variable costing and net income includes a 20 percent inventory holding cost?<div style=padding-top: 35px> ?Senior management at Navisky, including Mr. Hoffman, expects to sell about 1,200 units of the environmental GPS device this year. However, they have considerable discretion in setting production levels. Their plant has excess capacity and can produce up to 1,500 environmental devices without seeing any increase in the variable manufacturing costs per unit.
?Navisky uses a traditional absorption costing system to absorb manufacturing overhead into product costs for inventory valuation and to calculate earnings for internal compensation purposes as well as external reporting. At the beginning of the current fiscal year, there was no beginning inventory of the environmental GPS devices.
Required:
a. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see Navisky produce if he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year?
b. Suppose Mr. Hoffman's bonus calculation was based on net income after including a charge for inventory holding costs at 20 percent of the ending inventory value. In other words, his bonus is 5 percent of net income in excess of €850,000 up to €1,400,000 where net income includes a 20 percent inventory holding cost. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see produced if he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year?
c. Explain why your answers in parts (b) and (c) differ, if they do.
d. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see produced assuming he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year if Navisky's net income is calculated using variable costing and net income includes a 20 percent inventory holding cost?
Question
Joon
Joon manufactures and sells to retailers a variety of home care and personal care products. Joon has a single plant that produces all four of its product lines: Stick Goods (brooms and mops), Floor Care (strippers, soaps, and waxes), Brushes (hair brushes and shoe brushes), and Aerosols (room deodorizers, bug spray, furniture wax). The following statement summarizes Joon's financial performance for the most recent fiscal year. Joon Joon manufactures and sells to retailers a variety of home care and personal care products. Joon has a single plant that produces all four of its product lines: Stick Goods (brooms and mops), Floor Care (strippers, soaps, and waxes), Brushes (hair brushes and shoe brushes), and Aerosols (room deodorizers, bug spray, furniture wax). The following statement summarizes Joon's financial performance for the most recent fiscal year.   ?Direct labor costs $21 per hour. Fixed manufacturing overhead of $4.433 million is allocated to products based on direct labor hours. Last year, the fixed manufacturing overhead rate was $31 per direct labor hour ($4.433 million/143,000 direct labor hours). Variable manufacturing overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour. Selling, general, and administrative (SG A) expenses consist of fixed costs ($1.35 million) and variable costs ($2,951 million). The variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues. ?The Joon plant has considerable excess capacity. Senior management has identified a potential acquisition target, Snuffy, that sells a line of automotive products (car waxes, soaps, brushes, and so forth) that are complementary to Joon's existing products and that can be manufactured in Joon's plant. Snuffy does not have any manufacturing facilities, but rather outsources the production of its products to contract manufacturers. Snuffy can be purchased for $38 million. The following table summarizes Snuffy's current operating data:   Senior management argues that the reason Joon is currently losing money is that volumes have fallen in the plant and that the remaining products are having to carry an increasingly larger share of the overhead. This has caused some Joon product managers to raise prices. Senior managers realize that they must drive more volume into the plant if Joon is to return to profitability. Since organic growth (i.e., growth from existing products) is difficult due to a very competitive marketplace, management proposes to the board of directors the purchase of Snuffy as a way to drive additional volume into the plant. With volume of 60,000 cases and 1.9 direct labor hours per case, Snuffy's car care product line will add 114,000 direct labor hours to the plant and increase volume about 80 percent (114,000/143,000). This additional volume will significantly reduce the overhead the existing products must absorb and allow the product managers to lower prices. To incorporate Snuffy's manufacturing and distribution into Joon's current operations, Joon will have to incur additional fixed manufacturing overhead of $450,000 per year for new equipment, and $400,000 per year for additional SG A expenses. Required: a. Prepare a pro forma financial statement that shows Joon's financial performance (net income) for the most recent fiscal year assuming that Joon has already acquired Snuffy's car care products and has incorporated them into Joon's manufacturing and SG A processes. In preparing your analysis, make the following assumptions: (i) Snuffy's products have the same fixed and variable cost structure as Joon's exisiting lines (i.e., variable overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour and variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues). (ii) The addition of Snuffy products does not change the demand for Joon's existing products. (iii) There are no positive or negative externalities in manufacturing from having the additional Snuffy volume in the plant. (iv) There is sufficient excess capacity in the plant and the local labor markets to absorb the additional Snuffy volume without causing labor rates or raw material prices to rise. b. Based on your financial analysis in part ( a ), should Joon acquire Snuffy? c. Evaluate management's arguments in favor of acquiring Snuffy. d. What other advice would you offer Joon's management?<div style=padding-top: 35px> ?Direct labor costs $21 per hour. Fixed manufacturing overhead of $4.433 million is allocated to products based on direct labor hours. Last year, the fixed manufacturing overhead rate was $31 per direct labor hour ($4.433 million/143,000 direct labor hours). Variable manufacturing overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour. Selling, general, and administrative (SG A) expenses consist of fixed costs ($1.35 million) and variable costs ($2,951 million). The variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues.
?The Joon plant has considerable excess capacity. Senior management has identified a potential acquisition target, Snuffy, that sells a line of automotive products (car waxes, soaps, brushes, and so forth) that are complementary to Joon's existing products and that can be manufactured in Joon's plant. Snuffy does not have any manufacturing facilities, but rather outsources the production of its products to contract manufacturers. Snuffy can be purchased for $38 million. The following table summarizes Snuffy's current operating data: Joon Joon manufactures and sells to retailers a variety of home care and personal care products. Joon has a single plant that produces all four of its product lines: Stick Goods (brooms and mops), Floor Care (strippers, soaps, and waxes), Brushes (hair brushes and shoe brushes), and Aerosols (room deodorizers, bug spray, furniture wax). The following statement summarizes Joon's financial performance for the most recent fiscal year.   ?Direct labor costs $21 per hour. Fixed manufacturing overhead of $4.433 million is allocated to products based on direct labor hours. Last year, the fixed manufacturing overhead rate was $31 per direct labor hour ($4.433 million/143,000 direct labor hours). Variable manufacturing overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour. Selling, general, and administrative (SG A) expenses consist of fixed costs ($1.35 million) and variable costs ($2,951 million). The variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues. ?The Joon plant has considerable excess capacity. Senior management has identified a potential acquisition target, Snuffy, that sells a line of automotive products (car waxes, soaps, brushes, and so forth) that are complementary to Joon's existing products and that can be manufactured in Joon's plant. Snuffy does not have any manufacturing facilities, but rather outsources the production of its products to contract manufacturers. Snuffy can be purchased for $38 million. The following table summarizes Snuffy's current operating data:   Senior management argues that the reason Joon is currently losing money is that volumes have fallen in the plant and that the remaining products are having to carry an increasingly larger share of the overhead. This has caused some Joon product managers to raise prices. Senior managers realize that they must drive more volume into the plant if Joon is to return to profitability. Since organic growth (i.e., growth from existing products) is difficult due to a very competitive marketplace, management proposes to the board of directors the purchase of Snuffy as a way to drive additional volume into the plant. With volume of 60,000 cases and 1.9 direct labor hours per case, Snuffy's car care product line will add 114,000 direct labor hours to the plant and increase volume about 80 percent (114,000/143,000). This additional volume will significantly reduce the overhead the existing products must absorb and allow the product managers to lower prices. To incorporate Snuffy's manufacturing and distribution into Joon's current operations, Joon will have to incur additional fixed manufacturing overhead of $450,000 per year for new equipment, and $400,000 per year for additional SG A expenses. Required: a. Prepare a pro forma financial statement that shows Joon's financial performance (net income) for the most recent fiscal year assuming that Joon has already acquired Snuffy's car care products and has incorporated them into Joon's manufacturing and SG A processes. In preparing your analysis, make the following assumptions: (i) Snuffy's products have the same fixed and variable cost structure as Joon's exisiting lines (i.e., variable overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour and variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues). (ii) The addition of Snuffy products does not change the demand for Joon's existing products. (iii) There are no positive or negative externalities in manufacturing from having the additional Snuffy volume in the plant. (iv) There is sufficient excess capacity in the plant and the local labor markets to absorb the additional Snuffy volume without causing labor rates or raw material prices to rise. b. Based on your financial analysis in part ( a ), should Joon acquire Snuffy? c. Evaluate management's arguments in favor of acquiring Snuffy. d. What other advice would you offer Joon's management?<div style=padding-top: 35px> Senior management argues that the reason Joon is currently losing money is that volumes have fallen in the plant and that the remaining products are having to carry an increasingly larger share of the overhead. This has caused some Joon product managers to raise prices. Senior managers realize that they must drive more volume into the plant if Joon is to return to profitability. Since organic growth (i.e., growth from existing products) is difficult due to a very competitive marketplace, management proposes to the board of directors the purchase of Snuffy as a way to drive additional volume into the plant. With volume of 60,000 cases and 1.9 direct labor hours per case, Snuffy's car care product line will add 114,000 direct labor hours to the plant and increase volume about 80 percent (114,000/143,000). This additional volume will significantly reduce the overhead the existing products must absorb and allow the product managers to lower prices. To incorporate Snuffy's manufacturing and distribution into Joon's current operations, Joon will have to incur additional fixed manufacturing overhead of $450,000 per year for new equipment, and $400,000 per year for additional SG A expenses.
Required:
a. Prepare a pro forma financial statement that shows Joon's financial performance (net income) for the most recent fiscal year assuming that Joon has already acquired Snuffy's car care products and has incorporated them into Joon's manufacturing and SG A processes. In preparing your analysis, make the following assumptions:
(i) Snuffy's products have the same fixed and variable cost structure as Joon's exisiting lines (i.e., variable overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour and variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues).
(ii) The addition of Snuffy products does not change the demand for Joon's existing products.
(iii) There are no positive or negative externalities in manufacturing from having the additional Snuffy volume in the plant.
(iv) There is sufficient excess capacity in the plant and the local labor markets to absorb the additional Snuffy volume without causing labor rates or raw material prices to rise.
b. Based on your financial analysis in part ( a ), should Joon acquire Snuffy?
c. Evaluate management's arguments in favor of acquiring Snuffy.
d. What other advice would you offer Joon's management?
Question
DIM
Diagnostic Imaging Medical (DIM) has introduced a revolutionary new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device that it sells to hospital radiology departments. Their new device has a much larger chamber that reduces patients' claustrophobic reactions compared to current machines. The following table displays how total cost per year varies with annual production. In other words, if DIM produces nine machines, the nine machines have a total manufacturing cost of $2.93 million. DIM Diagnostic Imaging Medical (DIM) has introduced a revolutionary new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device that it sells to hospital radiology departments. Their new device has a much larger chamber that reduces patients' claustrophobic reactions compared to current machines. The following table displays how total cost per year varies with annual production. In other words, if DIM produces nine machines, the nine machines have a total manufacturing cost of $2.93 million.   To simplify the analysis, assume DIM has no period costs, only the product costs in the above table. Management receives a bonus based on reported profits, where profits are calculated using absorption costing. Required: a. At a selling price of $500,000 per MRI, management expects to sell six units next year and plans to produce a few extra machines. The extra units are for training, marketing, and temporary spare parts in case an installed MRI fails and spare parts are needed. Management has financing and production capacity to vary production between 6 and 10 units. How many MRIs do you expect management to produce? Show your analysis that leads to this conclusion. b. Instead of expecting to sell six units at $500,000 each as in part ( a ), management expects to sell 11 units at $400,000 per unit. With expected sales at 11 units and a price of $400,000, DIM has the resources to produce between 11 and 15 MRIs. How many MRIs do you expect management to produce if expected sales are 11 units? Show your analysis that leads to this conclusion. c. Describe the differences and similarities in your answers to parts ( a ) and ( b ). Pay particular attention to the relation between units sold [6 in part ( a ) and 11 in part ( b )] and expected units produced, and how this relation differs or does not differ between parts ( a ) and ( b ). Also, explain what is causing your answers in parts ( a ) and ( b ) to differ or not differ. d. Provide some plausible explanations of why average costs may increase beyond a certain quantity of production.<div style=padding-top: 35px> To simplify the analysis, assume DIM has no period costs, only the product costs in the above table. Management receives a bonus based on reported profits, where profits are calculated using absorption costing.
Required:
a. At a selling price of $500,000 per MRI, management expects to sell six units next year and plans to produce a few extra machines. The extra units are for training, marketing, and temporary spare parts in case an installed MRI fails and spare parts are needed. Management has financing and production capacity to vary production between 6 and 10 units. How many MRIs do you expect management to produce? Show your analysis that leads to this conclusion.
b. Instead of expecting to sell six units at $500,000 each as in part ( a ), management expects to sell 11 units at $400,000 per unit. With expected sales at 11 units and a price of $400,000, DIM has the resources to produce between 11 and 15 MRIs. How many MRIs do you expect management to produce if expected sales are 11 units? Show your analysis that leads to this conclusion.
c. Describe the differences and similarities in your answers to parts ( a ) and ( b ). Pay particular attention to the relation between units sold [6 in part ( a ) and 11 in part ( b )] and expected units produced, and how this relation differs or does not differ between parts ( a ) and ( b ). Also, explain what is causing your answers in parts ( a ) and ( b ) to differ or not differ.
d. Provide some plausible explanations of why average costs may increase beyond a certain quantity of production.
Question
Xerox
An October 25, 1999, article in Business Week by D. Brady, "Why Xerox Is Struggling," reported:
President and Chief Executive G. Richard Thoman is a big-picture guy. For the past two years, he has preached a digital revolution at the copier giant. Get down to the detail, though, and it's clear that the revolution isn't going as planned: In both copiers and printers, Xerox is losing ground. On October 18, the company announced lower than expected earnings and the stock price tumbled more than 13% on that day. Xerox stock is down 60% from its recent high of $60 in July. Xerox blamed the bad news on short-term surprises: sagging productivity in the sales force after a big reorganization as well as weakness in Brazil. But the sheer scope of bad news shocked even Thoman, who told investors in a conference call that he was "disappointed and sad about this quarter."
?Thoman took the top job in April and vowed annual earnings growth in the "mid-to-high teens."
?Beginning November 1, 1999, Xerox factories increased their hours from five eight-hour days a week to six ten-hour days a week through the end of the year. The factory managers were told to build inventories in expectation of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 1999. Fourth-quarter sales were expected to be higher because of anticipation that the new sales force reorganization would increase sales.
Required:
Offer an alternative reason(s) for Xerox's decision to increase output in its factories.
Question
Easton Plant
The Easton plant produces sheet metal chassis for television sets. Its customer is General Electric Appliances. The chassis are manufactured on a computerized, numerically controlled (NC) machine that cuts, drills, and bends the metal to form the chassis for the television set. Two different chassis are produced: HX?3 and DX?55.
?Easton has a single plant wide overhead account. Actual machine minutes on the NC machine are used to distribute overhead to the two products. There were no beginning inventories of work in process or finished goods. The following table summarizes the planned and actual production data for the year: Easton Plant The Easton plant produces sheet metal chassis for television sets. Its customer is General Electric Appliances. The chassis are manufactured on a computerized, numerically controlled (NC) machine that cuts, drills, and bends the metal to form the chassis for the television set. Two different chassis are produced: HX?3 and DX?55. ?Easton has a single plant wide overhead account. Actual machine minutes on the NC machine are used to distribute overhead to the two products. There were no beginning inventories of work in process or finished goods. The following table summarizes the planned and actual production data for the year:   The following data summarize the flexible overhead budget:   At the end of the year, the following overhead amounts had been incurred:   Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. The ending finished goods inventory consists of 2,000 units of HX-3 and 1,000 units of DX-55, representing 13,400 minutes and 10,300 minutes of actual machine time, respectively. Required: (Round all dollars, including overhead rates, to two decimal places.) a. Calculate the overhead absorption rate set at the start of the year. b. Calculate the over-or under absorbed overhead for the year. c. The firm is considering switching to variable costing. What effect would this decision have on Easton's reported profit for this year? To implement variable costing at the end of the year, variable overhead is calculated as $3.00 per machine minute times the actual number of machine minutes. Fixed overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and variable overhead. d. Instead of defining fixed overhead as all overhead in excess of variable overhead as in part ( c ) , assume the following: Fixed overhead is budgeted fixed overhead ($820,000), and variable overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and budgeted fixed overhead. What is the difference between absorption net income and variable costing income given these new assumptions?<div style=padding-top: 35px> The following data summarize the flexible overhead budget: Easton Plant The Easton plant produces sheet metal chassis for television sets. Its customer is General Electric Appliances. The chassis are manufactured on a computerized, numerically controlled (NC) machine that cuts, drills, and bends the metal to form the chassis for the television set. Two different chassis are produced: HX?3 and DX?55. ?Easton has a single plant wide overhead account. Actual machine minutes on the NC machine are used to distribute overhead to the two products. There were no beginning inventories of work in process or finished goods. The following table summarizes the planned and actual production data for the year:   The following data summarize the flexible overhead budget:   At the end of the year, the following overhead amounts had been incurred:   Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. The ending finished goods inventory consists of 2,000 units of HX-3 and 1,000 units of DX-55, representing 13,400 minutes and 10,300 minutes of actual machine time, respectively. Required: (Round all dollars, including overhead rates, to two decimal places.) a. Calculate the overhead absorption rate set at the start of the year. b. Calculate the over-or under absorbed overhead for the year. c. The firm is considering switching to variable costing. What effect would this decision have on Easton's reported profit for this year? To implement variable costing at the end of the year, variable overhead is calculated as $3.00 per machine minute times the actual number of machine minutes. Fixed overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and variable overhead. d. Instead of defining fixed overhead as all overhead in excess of variable overhead as in part ( c ) , assume the following: Fixed overhead is budgeted fixed overhead ($820,000), and variable overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and budgeted fixed overhead. What is the difference between absorption net income and variable costing income given these new assumptions?<div style=padding-top: 35px> At the end of the year, the following overhead amounts had been incurred: Easton Plant The Easton plant produces sheet metal chassis for television sets. Its customer is General Electric Appliances. The chassis are manufactured on a computerized, numerically controlled (NC) machine that cuts, drills, and bends the metal to form the chassis for the television set. Two different chassis are produced: HX?3 and DX?55. ?Easton has a single plant wide overhead account. Actual machine minutes on the NC machine are used to distribute overhead to the two products. There were no beginning inventories of work in process or finished goods. The following table summarizes the planned and actual production data for the year:   The following data summarize the flexible overhead budget:   At the end of the year, the following overhead amounts had been incurred:   Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. The ending finished goods inventory consists of 2,000 units of HX-3 and 1,000 units of DX-55, representing 13,400 minutes and 10,300 minutes of actual machine time, respectively. Required: (Round all dollars, including overhead rates, to two decimal places.) a. Calculate the overhead absorption rate set at the start of the year. b. Calculate the over-or under absorbed overhead for the year. c. The firm is considering switching to variable costing. What effect would this decision have on Easton's reported profit for this year? To implement variable costing at the end of the year, variable overhead is calculated as $3.00 per machine minute times the actual number of machine minutes. Fixed overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and variable overhead. d. Instead of defining fixed overhead as all overhead in excess of variable overhead as in part ( c ) , assume the following: Fixed overhead is budgeted fixed overhead ($820,000), and variable overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and budgeted fixed overhead. What is the difference between absorption net income and variable costing income given these new assumptions?<div style=padding-top: 35px> Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. The ending finished goods inventory consists of 2,000 units of HX-3 and 1,000 units of DX-55, representing 13,400 minutes and 10,300 minutes of actual machine time, respectively.
Required: (Round all dollars, including overhead rates, to two decimal places.)
a. Calculate the overhead absorption rate set at the start of the year.
b. Calculate the over-or under absorbed overhead for the year.
c. The firm is considering switching to variable costing. What effect would this decision have on Easton's reported profit for this year? To implement variable costing at the end of the year, variable overhead is calculated as $3.00 per machine minute times the actual number of machine minutes. Fixed overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and variable overhead.
d. Instead of defining fixed overhead as all overhead in excess of variable overhead as in part ( c ) , assume the following: Fixed overhead is budgeted fixed overhead ($820,000), and variable overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and budgeted fixed overhead. What is the difference between absorption net income and variable costing income given these new assumptions?
Question
Varilux
Varilux manufactures a single product and sells it for $10 per unit. At the beginning of the year, there were 1,000 units in inventory. Upon further investigation, you discover that units produced last year had $3 of fixed manufacturing costs and $2 of variable manufacturing costs. During the year, Varilux produced 10,000 units of product. Each unit produced generated $3 of variable manufacturing cost. Total fixed manufacturing cost for the current year was $40,000. Selling and administrative costs consisted of $12,000 of variable costs and $18,000 of fixed costs. There were no inventories at the end of the year.
Required:
Prepare two income statements for the current year: one on a variable cost basis and the other on an absorption cost basis. Explain any difference between the two net income numbers and provide calculations supporting your explanation of the difference.
Question
Weststar Appliances
Weststar manufactures and distributes a complete line of home appliances worldwide. Lynn Tweedie is the U.S. Space Saver Dishwasher product manager for Weststar Appliances. Her responsibilities include pricing, planning, and sales of Weststar's Space Saver dishwasher in the United States. It is the end of the third quarter and Tweedie is deciding how many Space Saver washers to produce in the fourth quarter. Given sales from the first three quarters and orders for the last quarter, she expects total sales for the year to be 73,000 washers at $200 per unit. There are 12,000 washers in inventory at a (LIFO) cost of $90 per washer. The factory produced 58,000 washers in the first three quarters of this year and Tweedie is considering ordering an additional 10,000, 15,000, or 20,000 washers in the fourth quarter. The plant's capacity can easily accommodate any of these volume levels without affecting fixed costs or variable cost per unit. The variable manufacturing cost of the washer is $75 and the plant has fixed annual costs of $1.3 million. Manufacturing overhead is allocated to dishwashers based on units. Tweedie's selling and administrative expenses consist of $15 of variable cost per washer and fixed cost of $2.92 million. The dishwasher division has a 17 percent weighted-average cost of capital and invested capital (not including inventories) of $18 million. Weststar uses full absorption costing.
Required:
a. Prepare a table showing annual accounting earnings prepared under absorption costing for the Space Saver dishwasher for annual production levels of 68,000, 73,000, and 78,000 washers.
b. If Lynn Tweedie's bonus depends on reported accounting earnings from Space Saver dishwashers, what production quantity is she likely to select for the fourth quarter?
c. Prepare a table computing the valuation of the ending inventory (under LIFO) for annual production levels of 68,000, 73,000, and 78,000 washers.
d. If Lynn Tweedie's bonus depends on residual income from Space Saver dishwashers, what production quantity is she likely to select for the fourth quarter?
e. How would your answer change in part ( d ) if Tweedie's bonus was based on return on assets?
Question
Truini Paints
Using the data from Table 10?6, recast the analysis with one change of assumption: Instead of assuming that an additional $17,000 of overhead was incurred in both years, assume that overhead was lower each year by $10,000. How do incentives change regarding the treatment of the $10,000 savings?
Question
Blauvelt Products
Blauvelt Products uses a flexible budget to set the overhead rate at the beginning of the year based on units produced. In year 1 budgeted fixed overhead is $1 million and budgeted variable overhead is $2 per unit. Direct material and direct labor together are $5 per unit. Blauvelt sells the completed product for $30. There is no beginning inventory. Budgeted volume is 80,000 units. Production and sales are 80,000 units. Actual overhead incurred in year 1 is $1,160,000. Any under-or overabsorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold.
?In year 2, budgeted volume and production are again both 80,000 units. However, only 60,000 units are sold. Budgeted fixed overhead is $1 million and budgeted variable overhead is $2 per unit. Direct material and direct labor are $5 per unit. Final selling price remains at $30 per unit. Actual overhead incurred in year 2 is $1.35 million.
Required:
a. Calculate net income in year 1 first using absorption costing and then using variable costing. Explain any difference between the two net income numbers.
b. Calculate net income in year 2 using absorption costing, where the overhead rate used to assign overhead to products is based on actual overhead incurred.
c. Calculate net income in year 2 using variable costing, where any difference between budgeted overhead and actual overhead is treated as a fixed cost.
d. Calculate net income in year 2 using variable costing, where any difference between budgeted overhead and actual overhead is treated as a variable cost.
e. Explain why your answers in parts ( b ) , ( c ) , and ( d ) differ.
Question
Zipp Cards
Zipp Cards buys baseball cards in bulk from the companies that produce them. Zipp buys sheets of 48 cards, then cuts the sheets into individual cards, and sorts and packages them, usually by team. Zipp then sells the packages to large discount stores. The accompanying table provides information regarding operations for 2010 and 2011. Zipp Cards Zipp Cards buys baseball cards in bulk from the companies that produce them. Zipp buys sheets of 48 cards, then cuts the sheets into individual cards, and sorts and packages them, usually by team. Zipp then sells the packages to large discount stores. The accompanying table provides information regarding operations for 2010 and 2011.   *One unit equals 48 cards. ?Volume is measured in terms of 48-card sheets processed. Budgeted production and actual production in 2010 were both 50,000 units. There were no beginning inventories on January 1, 2010. In 2011, budgeted and actual production rose to 75,000 units. ?At the beginning of 2012, the president of Zipp was pleasantly surprised when the accountant showed her the income statement for the year 2011. The president remarked, I'm surprised we made more money in 2011 than 2010. We had to cut prices and we didn't sell as many units, yet we still made more money. Well, you're the accountant and these numbers don't lie. Required: a. Prepare income statements for 2010 and 2011 using absorption costing. b. Prepare a statement reconciling the change in net income from 2010 to 2011. Explain to the president why the firm made more money in 2011 than in 2010.<div style=padding-top: 35px> *One unit equals 48 cards.
?Volume is measured in terms of 48-card sheets processed. Budgeted production and actual production in 2010 were both 50,000 units. There were no beginning inventories on January 1, 2010. In 2011, budgeted and actual production rose to 75,000 units.
?At the beginning of 2012, the president of Zipp was pleasantly surprised when the accountant showed her the income statement for the year 2011. The president remarked, "I'm surprised we made more money in 2011 than 2010. We had to cut prices and we didn't sell as many units, yet we still made more money. Well, you're the accountant and these numbers don't lie."
Required:
a. Prepare income statements for 2010 and 2011 using absorption costing.
b. Prepare a statement reconciling the change in net income from 2010 to 2011. Explain to the president why the firm made more money in 2011 than in 2010.
Question
UniCom
UniCom produces a wide range of consumer electronics. UniCom's Newark, New York, plant produces two types of cordless phones: 2.4 GHz and 6.0 GHz. The following table summarizes operations at the Newark UniCom plant for the years 2009 and 2010. UniCom UniCom produces a wide range of consumer electronics. UniCom's Newark, New York, plant produces two types of cordless phones: 2.4 GHz and 6.0 GHz. The following table summarizes operations at the Newark UniCom plant for the years 2009 and 2010.   Fixed manufacturing overhead amounted to $4 million in each year. At the start of 2009, there were no beginning inventories of either 2.4-GHz or 6.0-GHz cordless phones. UniCom uses FIFO to value inventories. Required: a. Prepare variable costing income statements for 2009 and 2010. b. Prepare absorption costing income statements for 2009 and 2010. At the end of the year, fixed manufacturing overhead is absorbed to the two phone models using direct material as the allocation base. c. Prepare a table that reconciles any differences in variable costing and absorption costing net incomes for 2009 and 2010.<div style=padding-top: 35px> Fixed manufacturing overhead amounted to $4 million in each year. At the start of 2009, there were no beginning inventories of either 2.4-GHz or 6.0-GHz cordless phones. UniCom uses FIFO to value inventories.
Required:
a. Prepare variable costing income statements for 2009 and 2010.
b. Prepare absorption costing income statements for 2009 and 2010. At the end of the year, fixed manufacturing overhead is absorbed to the two phone models using direct material as the allocation base.
c. Prepare a table that reconciles any differences in variable costing and absorption costing net incomes for 2009 and 2010.
Question
Transpacific Bank
You are working as a loan officer at Transpacific Bank and are analyzing a loan request for a client when you come across the following footnote in the client's annual report:
Inventories are priced at the lower of cost or market of materials plus other direct (variable) costs. Fixed overheads of $4.2 million this year and $3.0 million last year are excluded from inventories. Omitting such overhead resulted in a reduction in net income (after taxes) of $720,000 for this year. Our tax rate is 40 percent.
?In preparing to present the loan application to the bank's loan committee, write a brief paragraph in nontechnical terms describing what this footnote means and how it affects the bank's evaluation of the financial condition of the borrower.
Question
Sants Brakes Co.
The current year's income statement for Sants Brakes Co. on a variable costing basis appears in the accompanying table. Sants Brakes Co. The current year's income statement for Sants Brakes Co. on a variable costing basis appears in the accompanying table.   ?Inventories of finished stock were increased during the year in anticipation of increases in sales volume in the current year. Inventories in units of product for the beginning and end of the year follow.   ?The budgeted operating level for assigning fixed overhead to production is 1.8 million machine hours. One-half hour is required to produce a unit of G-226, two hours are required for a unit of G-348, and four hours are required for a unit of G-714. Required: a. Recast the income statement on an absorption costing basis. b. Explain why the income from manufacturing on the absorption costing statement differs from the income on the variable costing statement. Show your computations.<div style=padding-top: 35px> ?Inventories of finished stock were increased during the year in anticipation of increases in sales volume in the current year. Inventories in units of product for the beginning and end of the year follow. Sants Brakes Co. The current year's income statement for Sants Brakes Co. on a variable costing basis appears in the accompanying table.   ?Inventories of finished stock were increased during the year in anticipation of increases in sales volume in the current year. Inventories in units of product for the beginning and end of the year follow.   ?The budgeted operating level for assigning fixed overhead to production is 1.8 million machine hours. One-half hour is required to produce a unit of G-226, two hours are required for a unit of G-348, and four hours are required for a unit of G-714. Required: a. Recast the income statement on an absorption costing basis. b. Explain why the income from manufacturing on the absorption costing statement differs from the income on the variable costing statement. Show your computations.<div style=padding-top: 35px> ?The budgeted operating level for assigning fixed overhead to production is 1.8 million machine hours. One-half hour is required to produce a unit of G-226, two hours are required for a unit of G-348, and four hours are required for a unit of G-714.
Required:
a. Recast the income statement on an absorption costing basis.
b. Explain why the income from manufacturing on the absorption costing statement differs from the income on the variable costing statement. Show your computations.
Question
Zeflax Bottles
Zeflax manufactures insulated plastic bottles for bikes that the company sells for $4.00 per bottle. Last year the company produced 230,000 bottles and sold 200,000 bottles. This year Zeflax produced 200,000 bottles and sold 230,000 bottles. In both years Zeflax's fixed manufacturing cost was $500,000 and its variable manufacturing cost was $1.00 per bottle. The president of Zeflax commented, "I don't understand these crazy financial statements. Our prices and costs didn't change, we sell more bottles this year, and we show lower income. Something has got to be wrong."
Required:
a. Prepare income statements for Zeflax for last year and this year using absorption costing. Assume that Zeflax's only costs are the fixed and variable manufacturing costs given in the problem.
b. Prepare income statements for Zeflax for last year and this year using variable costing. Assume that Zeflax's only costs are the fixed and variable manufacturing costs given in the problem.
c. Explain to the president of Zeflax in nontechnical terms why the financial statements prepared by the accountant in part ( a ) are not in error. In other words, explain to the president why net income fell this year from last year even though Zeflax sold more bottles.
Question
Alliance Tooling
Alliance Tooling produces a single product in its plant. At the beginning of the year, there were no units in inventory. During the year, Alliance produced 120,000 units and sold 100,000 units at $26.75 per unit. Variable manufacturing costs are $13.50 per unit. Alliance pays $2.70 per unit for sales commissions and shipping. It has fixed costs of $720,000 for selling and administration. Its tax rate is 40 percent.
Required:
a. Prepare an income statement for Alliance Tooling using absorption costing.
b. Prepare an income statement for Alliance Tooling using variable costing.
c. Explain why the net income figures computed in ( a ) and ( b ) differ.
Question
Aspen View
Aspen View produces a full line of sunglasses. This year it began producing a new model of sunglasses, the Peak 32. It produced 5,300 pairs and sold 4,900 pairs. The following table summarizes the fixed and variable costs of producing Peak 32 sunglasses. Aspen View uses variable costing to value its ending inventory. Aspen View Aspen View produces a full line of sunglasses. This year it began producing a new model of sunglasses, the Peak 32. It produced 5,300 pairs and sold 4,900 pairs. The following table summarizes the fixed and variable costs of producing Peak 32 sunglasses. Aspen View uses variable costing to value its ending inventory.   Required: a. What is Aspen View's ending inventory value of Peak 32 sunglasses? b. Aspen View is considering switching from variable costing to absorption costing. Would this year's net income from Peak 32 sunglasses be higher or lower using absorption costing? Explain why. c. Suppose Aspen View uses absorption costing. If, instead of producing 5,300 pairs of Peak 32s it produced only 5,000, would net income from Peak 32 sunglasses be higher or lower from the smaller production compared to the larger production? Explain why. d. Aspen View has an opportunity cost of capital of 20 percent. What is the cost of producing 5,300 pairs of Peak 32s instead of 4,900 pairs?<div style=padding-top: 35px> Required:
a. What is Aspen View's ending inventory value of Peak 32 sunglasses?
b. Aspen View is considering switching from variable costing to absorption costing. Would this year's net income from Peak 32 sunglasses be higher or lower using absorption costing? Explain why.
c. Suppose Aspen View uses absorption costing. If, instead of producing 5,300 pairs of Peak 32s it produced only 5,000, would net income from Peak 32 sunglasses be higher or lower from the smaller production compared to the larger production? Explain why.
d. Aspen View has an opportunity cost of capital of 20 percent. What is the cost of producing 5,300 pairs of Peak 32s instead of 4,900 pairs?
Question
CLIC Lighters
CLIC manufactures two types of cigarette lighters: Basic and Super. A new plant began producing both lighter models this year. The following variable costing statement summarizes the first year of operations: CLIC Lighters CLIC manufactures two types of cigarette lighters: Basic and Super. A new plant began producing both lighter models this year. The following variable costing statement summarizes the first year of operations:   ?For internal control purposes, variable costing is used. Management also wants income from manufacturing calculated using absorption costing. Fixed overhead is allocated to the two lighters using actual machine minutes. Each Basic lighter requires 1.1 machine minutes and each Super lighter requires 1.2 machine minutes. Required: a. Calculate the fixed overhead rate per machine minute. b. Calculate the plant's income from manufacturing for both Basic and Super lighters and for the entire plant using absorption costing. c. Prepare a table that reconciles the difference in income from manufacturing reported using variable costing and absorption costing. d. Explain in one or two sentences why income from manufacturing differs depending on whether variable costing or absorption costing is used.<div style=padding-top: 35px> ?For internal control purposes, variable costing is used. Management also wants income from manufacturing calculated using absorption costing. Fixed overhead is allocated to the two lighters using actual machine minutes. Each Basic lighter requires 1.1 machine minutes and each Super lighter requires 1.2 machine minutes.
Required:
a. Calculate the fixed overhead rate per machine minute.
b. Calculate the plant's income from manufacturing for both Basic and Super lighters and for the entire plant using absorption costing.
c. Prepare a table that reconciles the difference in income from manufacturing reported using variable costing and absorption costing.
d. Explain in one or two sentences why income from manufacturing differs depending on whether variable costing or absorption costing is used.
Question
Medford Mug Company
The Medford Mug Company is an old-line maker of ceramic coffee mugs. It imprints company logos and other sayings on mugs for both commercial and wholesale markets. The firm has the capacity to produce 50 million mugs per year, but the recession has cut production and sales in the current year to 15 million mugs. The accompanying table shows the operating statement for 2010. Medford Mug Company The Medford Mug Company is an old-line maker of ceramic coffee mugs. It imprints company logos and other sayings on mugs for both commercial and wholesale markets. The firm has the capacity to produce 50 million mugs per year, but the recession has cut production and sales in the current year to 15 million mugs. The accompanying table shows the operating statement for 2010.   At the end of 2010, there was no ending inventory of finished goods. ?The board of directors is very concerned about the $1.5 million operating loss. It hires an outside consultant who reports back that the firm suffers from two problems. First, the president of the company receives a fixed salary, and since she owns no stock, she has very little incentive to worry about company profits. The second problem is that the company has not aggressively marketed its product and has not kept up with changing markets. The current president is 64 and the board of directors makes her an offer to retire one year early so that they can hire a new president to turn the firm around. The current president accepts the offer to retire and the board immediately hires a new president with a proven track record as a turnaround specialist. ?The new president is hired with an employment contract that pays a fixed wage of $50,000 a year plus 15 percent of the firm's operating profits (if any). Operating profits are calculated using absorption costing. In 2011, the new president doubles the selling and administration budget to $8 million (which includes the president's salary of $50,000). He designs a new line of politically correct sayings to imprint on the mugs and expands inventory and the number of distributors handling the mugs. Production is increased to 45 million mugs and sales climb to 18 million mugs at $2 each. Variable costs per mug remain at $.50 and fixed costs at $20 million in 2011. ?At the end of 2011, the president meets with the board of directors and announces he has accepted another job. He believes he has successfully gotten Medford Mug back on track and thanks the board for giving him the opportunity. His new job is helping to turn around another struggling company. Required: a. Calculate the president's bonus for 2011. b. Evaluate the performance of the new president in 2011. Did he do as good a job as the numbers in ( a ) suggest?<div style=padding-top: 35px> At the end of 2010, there was no ending inventory of finished goods.
?The board of directors is very concerned about the $1.5 million operating loss. It hires an outside consultant who reports back that the firm suffers from two problems. First, the president of the company receives a fixed salary, and since she owns no stock, she has very little incentive to worry about company profits. The second problem is that the company has not aggressively marketed its product and has not kept up with changing markets. The current president is 64 and the board of directors makes her an offer to retire one year early so that they can hire a new president to turn the firm around. The current president accepts the offer to retire and the board immediately hires a new president with a proven track record as a turnaround specialist.
?The new president is hired with an employment contract that pays a fixed wage of $50,000 a year plus 15 percent of the firm's operating profits (if any). Operating profits are calculated using absorption costing. In 2011, the new president doubles the selling and administration budget to $8 million (which includes the president's salary of $50,000). He designs a new line of "politically correct" sayings to imprint on the mugs and expands inventory and the number of distributors handling the mugs. Production is increased to 45 million mugs and sales climb to 18 million mugs at $2 each. Variable costs per mug remain at $.50 and fixed costs at $20 million in 2011.
?At the end of 2011, the president meets with the board of directors and announces he has accepted another job. He believes he has successfully gotten Medford Mug back on track and thanks the board for giving him the opportunity. His new job is helping to turn around another struggling company.
Required:
a. Calculate the president's bonus for 2011.
b. Evaluate the performance of the new president in 2011. Did he do as good a job as the numbers in ( a ) suggest?
Question
Kothari Inc.
The telecom division of Kothari Inc. produces and sells 100,000 line modulators. Half of the modulators are sold externally at $150 per unit, and the other half are sold internally at variable manufacturing costs plus 10 percent. Kothari uses variable costing to evaluate the telecom division. The following summarizes the cost structure of the telecom division. Kothari Inc. The telecom division of Kothari Inc. produces and sells 100,000 line modulators. Half of the modulators are sold externally at $150 per unit, and the other half are sold internally at variable manufacturing costs plus 10 percent. Kothari uses variable costing to evaluate the telecom division. The following summarizes the cost structure of the telecom division.   Required: a. Calculate the net income of the telecom division (before taxes) using variable costing. b. Telecom can outsource the final assembly of all 100,000 modulators for $9.00 per modulator. If it does this, it can reduce variable manufacturing cost by $1.00 per unit and fixed manufacturing overhead by $700,000. If the managers of the telecom unit are compensated based on telecom's net income before taxes, do you expect them to outsource the final assembly of the modulators? Show calculations. c. What happens to the net cash flows of Kothari Inc. if the final assembly of the modulators is outsourced?<div style=padding-top: 35px> Required:
a. Calculate the net income of the telecom division (before taxes) using variable costing.
b. Telecom can outsource the final assembly of all 100,000 modulators for $9.00 per modulator. If it does this, it can reduce variable manufacturing cost by $1.00 per unit and fixed manufacturing overhead by $700,000. If the managers of the telecom unit are compensated based on telecom's net income before taxes, do you expect them to outsource the final assembly of the modulators? Show calculations.
c. What happens to the net cash flows of Kothari Inc. if the final assembly of the modulators is outsourced?
Question
Mystic Mugs
Sanjog and Rajiv Gupta have started a business that manufactures and sells thermal mugs. Users personalize the mugs by plugging them into a laptop and downloading their favorite images from a digital camera. The company makes two mug sizes: 16 and 24 ounce mugs. This is its first year of business. The following data summarize operations for the first year. Mystic Mugs Sanjog and Rajiv Gupta have started a business that manufactures and sells thermal mugs. Users personalize the mugs by plugging them into a laptop and downloading their favorite images from a digital camera. The company makes two mug sizes: 16 and 24 ounce mugs. This is its first year of business. The following data summarize operations for the first year.   There were no beginning inventories. Overhead is assigned to products using direct labor dollars. Required: a. Calculate Mystic Mugs's net income before taxes using absorption costing. b. Calculate Mystic Mugs's net income before taxes using variable costing. c. Prepare a table that reconciles any difference between the two net income figures calculated in parts ( a ) and ( b ). d. Write a short memo explaining in lay terms any difference between the two net income figures calculated in parts ( a ) and ( b ).<div style=padding-top: 35px> There were no beginning inventories. Overhead is assigned to products using direct labor dollars.
Required:
a. Calculate Mystic Mugs's net income before taxes using absorption costing.
b. Calculate Mystic Mugs's net income before taxes using variable costing.
c. Prepare a table that reconciles any difference between the two net income figures calculated in parts ( a ) and ( b ).
d. Write a short memo explaining in lay terms any difference between the two net income figures calculated in parts ( a ) and ( b ).
Question
Avant Designs
Avant Designs designs and manufactures polished-nickel fashion bracelets. It offers two bracelets: Aztec and Mayan. The following data summarize budgeted operations for the current year: Avant Designs Avant Designs designs and manufactures polished-nickel fashion bracelets. It offers two bracelets: Aztec and Mayan. The following data summarize budgeted operations for the current year:   Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead for the year was $258,000. Required: a. Prepare the budgeted income statement for the year using variable costing. b. Prepare the budgeted income statement for the year using absorption costing. Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead is allocated to the two bracelets using machine minutes. c. Explain the difference in the two net income figures computed in parts ( a ) and ( b ). That is, reconcile any difference in earnings and explain why it occurs.<div style=padding-top: 35px> Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead for the year was $258,000.
Required:
a. Prepare the budgeted income statement for the year using variable costing.
b. Prepare the budgeted income statement for the year using absorption costing. Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead is allocated to the two bracelets using machine minutes.
c. Explain the difference in the two net income figures computed in parts ( a ) and ( b ). That is, reconcile any difference in earnings and explain why it occurs.
Question
Taylor Chains
Taylor designs and manufactures high-performance bicycle chains for professional racers and serious amateurs. Two new titanium chain sets, the Challenger and the Tour, sell for €110 and €155, respectively. The following data summarize the cost structure for the two chain sets: Taylor Chains Taylor designs and manufactures high-performance bicycle chains for professional racers and serious amateurs. Two new titanium chain sets, the Challenger and the Tour, sell for €110 and €155, respectively. The following data summarize the cost structure for the two chain sets:   ?Taylor uses an absorption costing system. Overhead is applied to these two products based on direct labor hours using a flexible budget to calculate the overhead rate before production begins for the year. Taylor budgeted (and produced) 43,000 Challenger chains and 55,000 Tour chains. Fixed manufacturing overhead was estimated to be €1.65 million and variable manufacturing overhead was estimated to be €1.75 per direct labor hour. Actual overhead incurred amounted to €2.1 million. Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. Required: a. Calculate the overhead rate Taylor used to absorb overhead to the chains. b. Using the predetermined overhead rate you calculated in ( a ), and assuming any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold, calculate Taylor Chains' net income before taxes for both the Challenger and Tour chains and for the entire firm. c. Instead of using absorption costing, use variable costing to calculate Taylor Chains' net income before taxes for both the Challenger and Tour chains and for the entire firm. Assume that any over-or under absorbed overhead is treated as a fixed cost and is written off to cost of goods sold. d. Explain why the net income numbers calculated in parts ( b ) and ( c ) differ and reconcile the difference numerically. e. Suppose that next year Taylor incurs total manufacturing overhead of €2.3 million and sells all the chains it produces next year as well as the 6,000 chains it had in inventory from the first year of production. How much manufacturing overhead will appear on Taylor's income statement if the company uses (i) absorption costing or (ii) variable costing?<div style=padding-top: 35px> ?Taylor uses an absorption costing system. Overhead is applied to these two products based on direct labor hours using a flexible budget to calculate the overhead rate before production begins for the year. Taylor budgeted (and produced) 43,000 Challenger chains and 55,000 Tour chains. Fixed manufacturing overhead was estimated to be €1.65 million and variable manufacturing overhead was estimated to be €1.75 per direct labor hour. Actual overhead incurred amounted to €2.1 million. Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold.
Required:
a. Calculate the overhead rate Taylor used to absorb overhead to the chains.
b. Using the predetermined overhead rate you calculated in ( a ), and assuming any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold, calculate Taylor Chains' net income before taxes for both the Challenger and Tour chains and for the entire firm.
c. Instead of using absorption costing, use variable costing to calculate Taylor Chains' net income before taxes for both the Challenger and Tour chains and for the entire firm. Assume that any over-or under absorbed overhead is treated as a fixed cost and is written off to cost of goods sold.
d. Explain why the net income numbers calculated in parts ( b ) and ( c ) differ and reconcile the difference numerically.
e. Suppose that next year Taylor incurs total manufacturing overhead of €2.3 million and sells all the chains it produces next year as well as the 6,000 chains it had in inventory from the first year of production. How much manufacturing overhead will appear on Taylor's income statement if the company uses (i) absorption costing or (ii) variable costing?
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/23
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 10: Criticisms of Absorption Cost Systems:incentive to Overproduce
1
Federal Mixing
Federal Mixing (FM) is a division of Federal Chemicals, a large diversified chemical company. FM provides mixing services for both outside customers and other Federal divisions. FM buys or receives liquid chemicals and combines and packages them according to the customer's specifications. FM computes its divisional net income on both a fully absorbed and variable costing basis. For the year just ending, it reported Federal Mixing Federal Mixing (FM) is a division of Federal Chemicals, a large diversified chemical company. FM provides mixing services for both outside customers and other Federal divisions. FM buys or receives liquid chemicals and combines and packages them according to the customer's specifications. FM computes its divisional net income on both a fully absorbed and variable costing basis. For the year just ending, it reported   Overhead is assigned to products using machine hours. ?There is no finished goods inventory at FM, only work-in-process (WIP) inventory. As soon as a product is completed, it is shipped to the customer. The beginning inventory was valued at $6.3 million and contained 70,000 machine hours. The ending WIP inventory was valued at $9.9 million and contained 90,000 machine hours. Required: Write a short nontechnical note to senior management explaining why variable costing and absorption costing net income amounts differ. Overhead is assigned to products using machine hours.
?There is no finished goods inventory at FM, only work-in-process (WIP) inventory. As soon as a product is completed, it is shipped to the customer. The beginning inventory was valued at $6.3 million and contained 70,000 machine hours. The ending WIP inventory was valued at $9.9 million and contained 90,000 machine hours.
Required:
Write a short nontechnical note to senior management explaining why variable costing and absorption costing net income amounts differ.
Absorption vs. Variable Costing
In the field of bookkeeping, variable costing (direct costing) and ingestion costing (full costing) are two distinct strategies for applying creation expenses to items or administrations. The distinction between the two techniques is in the treatment of settled assembling overhead expenses.
Under the immediate costing technique, settled assembling overhead expenses are expensed amid the period in which they are acquired. Under the full costing technique, settled assembling overhead expenses are expensed when the item is sold.
Variable costing discounts to pay all settled assembling costs acquired amid the year. Ingestion costing customizes the settled overheads between units in stock and units sold in view of machine hours.
Ingestion costing net pay is higher than under factor costing of $1.2 million. This implies inventories under ingestion costing are higher by $1.2 million.
The closing work-in-process stock includes 20,000 more machine hours than the opening stock Absorption vs. Variable Costing In the field of bookkeeping, variable costing (direct costing) and ingestion costing (full costing) are two distinct strategies for applying creation expenses to items or administrations. The distinction between the two techniques is in the treatment of settled assembling overhead expenses. Under the immediate costing technique, settled assembling overhead expenses are expensed amid the period in which they are acquired. Under the full costing technique, settled assembling overhead expenses are expensed when the item is sold. Variable costing discounts to pay all settled assembling costs acquired amid the year. Ingestion costing customizes the settled overheads between units in stock and units sold in view of machine hours. Ingestion costing net pay is higher than under factor costing of $1.2 million. This implies inventories under ingestion costing are higher by $1.2 million. The closing work-in-process stock includes 20,000 more machine hours than the opening stock   . From the information given, the settled overhead rate connected to items is $60 per machine hour. Compute the fixed overhead rate with the help of formula shown below:   Thus, the overhead rate comes out to be   . . From the information given, the settled overhead rate connected to items is $60 per machine hour.
Compute the fixed overhead rate with the help of formula shown below: Absorption vs. Variable Costing In the field of bookkeeping, variable costing (direct costing) and ingestion costing (full costing) are two distinct strategies for applying creation expenses to items or administrations. The distinction between the two techniques is in the treatment of settled assembling overhead expenses. Under the immediate costing technique, settled assembling overhead expenses are expensed amid the period in which they are acquired. Under the full costing technique, settled assembling overhead expenses are expensed when the item is sold. Variable costing discounts to pay all settled assembling costs acquired amid the year. Ingestion costing customizes the settled overheads between units in stock and units sold in view of machine hours. Ingestion costing net pay is higher than under factor costing of $1.2 million. This implies inventories under ingestion costing are higher by $1.2 million. The closing work-in-process stock includes 20,000 more machine hours than the opening stock   . From the information given, the settled overhead rate connected to items is $60 per machine hour. Compute the fixed overhead rate with the help of formula shown below:   Thus, the overhead rate comes out to be   . Thus, the overhead rate comes out to be Absorption vs. Variable Costing In the field of bookkeeping, variable costing (direct costing) and ingestion costing (full costing) are two distinct strategies for applying creation expenses to items or administrations. The distinction between the two techniques is in the treatment of settled assembling overhead expenses. Under the immediate costing technique, settled assembling overhead expenses are expensed amid the period in which they are acquired. Under the full costing technique, settled assembling overhead expenses are expensed when the item is sold. Variable costing discounts to pay all settled assembling costs acquired amid the year. Ingestion costing customizes the settled overheads between units in stock and units sold in view of machine hours. Ingestion costing net pay is higher than under factor costing of $1.2 million. This implies inventories under ingestion costing are higher by $1.2 million. The closing work-in-process stock includes 20,000 more machine hours than the opening stock   . From the information given, the settled overhead rate connected to items is $60 per machine hour. Compute the fixed overhead rate with the help of formula shown below:   Thus, the overhead rate comes out to be   . .
2
Navisky
Navisky designs, manufactures, and sells specialized GPS (Global Positioning System) devices for commercial applications. For example, Navisky currently sells a system for environmental studies and is planning systems for private aviation and fleet management. The firm has a design team that identifies potential commercial GPS applications, then designs and develops prototypes. Once a prototype is deemed successful and senior management determines that a market exists for the new application, the new design is put into production and the firm markets the new product through independent salespeople, direct marketing, trade shows, or whatever channel is most appropriate for that market.
?Currently, Navisky has one very successful system in production (for environmental studies) and several others in development. Navisky, located in Austria, is one of nine wholly owned subsidiaries of a large Swiss conglomerate. Andreas Hoffman, president of Navisky, expects to retire next year. He receives a fixed salary and a bonus based on reported accounting earnings. The bonus is 5 percent of earnings in excess of €850,000 for actual earnings between €850,000 and €1,400,000. If actual earnings exceed €1,400,000, the bonus is capped at €27,500 (5% × [€1,400,000 - €850,000]). (Earnings, both actual and target, are before taxes.)
?The following data summarize Navisky's current operations (in euros). Navisky Navisky designs, manufactures, and sells specialized GPS (Global Positioning System) devices for commercial applications. For example, Navisky currently sells a system for environmental studies and is planning systems for private aviation and fleet management. The firm has a design team that identifies potential commercial GPS applications, then designs and develops prototypes. Once a prototype is deemed successful and senior management determines that a market exists for the new application, the new design is put into production and the firm markets the new product through independent salespeople, direct marketing, trade shows, or whatever channel is most appropriate for that market. ?Currently, Navisky has one very successful system in production (for environmental studies) and several others in development. Navisky, located in Austria, is one of nine wholly owned subsidiaries of a large Swiss conglomerate. Andreas Hoffman, president of Navisky, expects to retire next year. He receives a fixed salary and a bonus based on reported accounting earnings. The bonus is 5 percent of earnings in excess of €850,000 for actual earnings between €850,000 and €1,400,000. If actual earnings exceed €1,400,000, the bonus is capped at €27,500 (5% × [€1,400,000 - €850,000]). (Earnings, both actual and target, are before taxes.) ?The following data summarize Navisky's current operations (in euros).   ?Senior management at Navisky, including Mr. Hoffman, expects to sell about 1,200 units of the environmental GPS device this year. However, they have considerable discretion in setting production levels. Their plant has excess capacity and can produce up to 1,500 environmental devices without seeing any increase in the variable manufacturing costs per unit. ?Navisky uses a traditional absorption costing system to absorb manufacturing overhead into product costs for inventory valuation and to calculate earnings for internal compensation purposes as well as external reporting. At the beginning of the current fiscal year, there was no beginning inventory of the environmental GPS devices. Required: a. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see Navisky produce if he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year? b. Suppose Mr. Hoffman's bonus calculation was based on net income after including a charge for inventory holding costs at 20 percent of the ending inventory value. In other words, his bonus is 5 percent of net income in excess of €850,000 up to €1,400,000 where net income includes a 20 percent inventory holding cost. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see produced if he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year? c. Explain why your answers in parts (b) and (c) differ, if they do. d. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see produced assuming he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year if Navisky's net income is calculated using variable costing and net income includes a 20 percent inventory holding cost? ?Senior management at Navisky, including Mr. Hoffman, expects to sell about 1,200 units of the environmental GPS device this year. However, they have considerable discretion in setting production levels. Their plant has excess capacity and can produce up to 1,500 environmental devices without seeing any increase in the variable manufacturing costs per unit.
?Navisky uses a traditional absorption costing system to absorb manufacturing overhead into product costs for inventory valuation and to calculate earnings for internal compensation purposes as well as external reporting. At the beginning of the current fiscal year, there was no beginning inventory of the environmental GPS devices.
Required:
a. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see Navisky produce if he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year?
b. Suppose Mr. Hoffman's bonus calculation was based on net income after including a charge for inventory holding costs at 20 percent of the ending inventory value. In other words, his bonus is 5 percent of net income in excess of €850,000 up to €1,400,000 where net income includes a 20 percent inventory holding cost. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see produced if he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year?
c. Explain why your answers in parts (b) and (c) differ, if they do.
d. How many units of the environmental GPS device would Mr. Hoffman like to see produced assuming he expects to sell 1,200 devices this year if Navisky's net income is calculated using variable costing and net income includes a 20 percent inventory holding cost?
Variable Costing
To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead.
Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered.
Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices.
a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units.
At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer. Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . Working Note:
Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . .
Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . .
Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . .
Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 0
.
b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500. Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 1
The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 2
Working Note:
Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 3
Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 4
.
Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 5
Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 6
.
Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 7
Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 8
.
Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 9
Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 0
.
c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge,
Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold.
d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower. Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 1
The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 2
Working Note:
Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 3
Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 4
.
Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 5
Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 6
.
Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 7
Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 8
.
Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows: Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 9
Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be Variable Costing To take into account lacks in retention costing information, key fund experts will regularly create supplemental information in view of variable costing systems. As its name recommends, just factor generation costs are allotted to stock and cost of products sold. These expenses by and large comprised of direct materials, coordinate work, and variable assembling overhead. Settled assembling costs are viewed as period costs alongside SG A costs. In some ways, this downplays the genuine cost of creation. The settled assembling overhead will be brought about regardless of what amount is delivered. Over the long haul, a business must recoup those expenses to survive. In any case, on a case-by-case premise, incorporating settled assembling overhead in an item cost investigation can result in some wrong choices. a.Mr. H, since he wants to leave one year from now and hereafter won't have to deal with any plenitude stock, has a propelling power to over convey. The table underneath demonstrates that given offers of 1200 units Mr. H should need to convey around 1,360 units. At 1,360 units, expected benefit are about €1,401,647, or basically finished the reward best of €1,400,000. So to grow his reward, Mr. H should make 1,360 units or 160 more than he would like to offer.   The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units using the equation as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1300 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1300 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   . Compute the bonus for 1360 units as follows:   Thus, the bonus for 1360 units to be   0 . b.With a stock holding cost of 20 percent deducted from profit, Mr. H will want to create 1,420 units on the grounds that at this generation level (and given offers of 1,200 units) Mr. H will achieve the reward top of €27,500.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1420 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1420 units to be   0 . c.Strikingly, charging Mr. H a stock holding expense of 20 percent really makes him over deliver significantly more. Without the 20 percent stock charge Mr. H just needs to deliver around 1,360 units (or 160 more than he hopes to offer) to come to the €1.4 million income top. In any case, with the 20 percent stock charge, Mr. H needs to deliver around 1,420 (or 220 more than he hopes to offer) to achieve the top. Henceforth, including the stock holding charge has the unreasonable motivator of really causing Mr. H to over to create significantly more. The explanation behind this is the presence of the reward top and the way that the 20 percent charge on the stock is not as much as the decrease in normal settled costs charged to cost of merchandise sold. d.Under factor costing and a 20 percent stock holding cost, Mr. H won't over deliver. He will deliver precisely what he means to offer, 1,200 gadgets. In the event that he over produces under factor costing, income falls, and consequently, his reward is lower.   1 The result of the above MS-Excel has been shown below:   2 Working Note: Compute the bonus for 1200 units as follows:   3 Thus, the bonus for 1200 units to be   4 . Compute the bonus for 1350 units as follows:   5 Thus, the bonus for 1350 units to be   6 . Compute the bonus for 1390 units as follows:   7 Thus, the bonus for 1390 units to be   8 . Compute the bonus for 1400 units as follows:   9 Thus, the bonus for 1400 units to be   0 . 0
.
3
Joon
Joon manufactures and sells to retailers a variety of home care and personal care products. Joon has a single plant that produces all four of its product lines: Stick Goods (brooms and mops), Floor Care (strippers, soaps, and waxes), Brushes (hair brushes and shoe brushes), and Aerosols (room deodorizers, bug spray, furniture wax). The following statement summarizes Joon's financial performance for the most recent fiscal year. Joon Joon manufactures and sells to retailers a variety of home care and personal care products. Joon has a single plant that produces all four of its product lines: Stick Goods (brooms and mops), Floor Care (strippers, soaps, and waxes), Brushes (hair brushes and shoe brushes), and Aerosols (room deodorizers, bug spray, furniture wax). The following statement summarizes Joon's financial performance for the most recent fiscal year.   ?Direct labor costs $21 per hour. Fixed manufacturing overhead of $4.433 million is allocated to products based on direct labor hours. Last year, the fixed manufacturing overhead rate was $31 per direct labor hour ($4.433 million/143,000 direct labor hours). Variable manufacturing overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour. Selling, general, and administrative (SG A) expenses consist of fixed costs ($1.35 million) and variable costs ($2,951 million). The variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues. ?The Joon plant has considerable excess capacity. Senior management has identified a potential acquisition target, Snuffy, that sells a line of automotive products (car waxes, soaps, brushes, and so forth) that are complementary to Joon's existing products and that can be manufactured in Joon's plant. Snuffy does not have any manufacturing facilities, but rather outsources the production of its products to contract manufacturers. Snuffy can be purchased for $38 million. The following table summarizes Snuffy's current operating data:   Senior management argues that the reason Joon is currently losing money is that volumes have fallen in the plant and that the remaining products are having to carry an increasingly larger share of the overhead. This has caused some Joon product managers to raise prices. Senior managers realize that they must drive more volume into the plant if Joon is to return to profitability. Since organic growth (i.e., growth from existing products) is difficult due to a very competitive marketplace, management proposes to the board of directors the purchase of Snuffy as a way to drive additional volume into the plant. With volume of 60,000 cases and 1.9 direct labor hours per case, Snuffy's car care product line will add 114,000 direct labor hours to the plant and increase volume about 80 percent (114,000/143,000). This additional volume will significantly reduce the overhead the existing products must absorb and allow the product managers to lower prices. To incorporate Snuffy's manufacturing and distribution into Joon's current operations, Joon will have to incur additional fixed manufacturing overhead of $450,000 per year for new equipment, and $400,000 per year for additional SG A expenses. Required: a. Prepare a pro forma financial statement that shows Joon's financial performance (net income) for the most recent fiscal year assuming that Joon has already acquired Snuffy's car care products and has incorporated them into Joon's manufacturing and SG A processes. In preparing your analysis, make the following assumptions: (i) Snuffy's products have the same fixed and variable cost structure as Joon's exisiting lines (i.e., variable overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour and variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues). (ii) The addition of Snuffy products does not change the demand for Joon's existing products. (iii) There are no positive or negative externalities in manufacturing from having the additional Snuffy volume in the plant. (iv) There is sufficient excess capacity in the plant and the local labor markets to absorb the additional Snuffy volume without causing labor rates or raw material prices to rise. b. Based on your financial analysis in part ( a ), should Joon acquire Snuffy? c. Evaluate management's arguments in favor of acquiring Snuffy. d. What other advice would you offer Joon's management? ?Direct labor costs $21 per hour. Fixed manufacturing overhead of $4.433 million is allocated to products based on direct labor hours. Last year, the fixed manufacturing overhead rate was $31 per direct labor hour ($4.433 million/143,000 direct labor hours). Variable manufacturing overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour. Selling, general, and administrative (SG A) expenses consist of fixed costs ($1.35 million) and variable costs ($2,951 million). The variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues.
?The Joon plant has considerable excess capacity. Senior management has identified a potential acquisition target, Snuffy, that sells a line of automotive products (car waxes, soaps, brushes, and so forth) that are complementary to Joon's existing products and that can be manufactured in Joon's plant. Snuffy does not have any manufacturing facilities, but rather outsources the production of its products to contract manufacturers. Snuffy can be purchased for $38 million. The following table summarizes Snuffy's current operating data: Joon Joon manufactures and sells to retailers a variety of home care and personal care products. Joon has a single plant that produces all four of its product lines: Stick Goods (brooms and mops), Floor Care (strippers, soaps, and waxes), Brushes (hair brushes and shoe brushes), and Aerosols (room deodorizers, bug spray, furniture wax). The following statement summarizes Joon's financial performance for the most recent fiscal year.   ?Direct labor costs $21 per hour. Fixed manufacturing overhead of $4.433 million is allocated to products based on direct labor hours. Last year, the fixed manufacturing overhead rate was $31 per direct labor hour ($4.433 million/143,000 direct labor hours). Variable manufacturing overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour. Selling, general, and administrative (SG A) expenses consist of fixed costs ($1.35 million) and variable costs ($2,951 million). The variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues. ?The Joon plant has considerable excess capacity. Senior management has identified a potential acquisition target, Snuffy, that sells a line of automotive products (car waxes, soaps, brushes, and so forth) that are complementary to Joon's existing products and that can be manufactured in Joon's plant. Snuffy does not have any manufacturing facilities, but rather outsources the production of its products to contract manufacturers. Snuffy can be purchased for $38 million. The following table summarizes Snuffy's current operating data:   Senior management argues that the reason Joon is currently losing money is that volumes have fallen in the plant and that the remaining products are having to carry an increasingly larger share of the overhead. This has caused some Joon product managers to raise prices. Senior managers realize that they must drive more volume into the plant if Joon is to return to profitability. Since organic growth (i.e., growth from existing products) is difficult due to a very competitive marketplace, management proposes to the board of directors the purchase of Snuffy as a way to drive additional volume into the plant. With volume of 60,000 cases and 1.9 direct labor hours per case, Snuffy's car care product line will add 114,000 direct labor hours to the plant and increase volume about 80 percent (114,000/143,000). This additional volume will significantly reduce the overhead the existing products must absorb and allow the product managers to lower prices. To incorporate Snuffy's manufacturing and distribution into Joon's current operations, Joon will have to incur additional fixed manufacturing overhead of $450,000 per year for new equipment, and $400,000 per year for additional SG A expenses. Required: a. Prepare a pro forma financial statement that shows Joon's financial performance (net income) for the most recent fiscal year assuming that Joon has already acquired Snuffy's car care products and has incorporated them into Joon's manufacturing and SG A processes. In preparing your analysis, make the following assumptions: (i) Snuffy's products have the same fixed and variable cost structure as Joon's exisiting lines (i.e., variable overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour and variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues). (ii) The addition of Snuffy products does not change the demand for Joon's existing products. (iii) There are no positive or negative externalities in manufacturing from having the additional Snuffy volume in the plant. (iv) There is sufficient excess capacity in the plant and the local labor markets to absorb the additional Snuffy volume without causing labor rates or raw material prices to rise. b. Based on your financial analysis in part ( a ), should Joon acquire Snuffy? c. Evaluate management's arguments in favor of acquiring Snuffy. d. What other advice would you offer Joon's management? Senior management argues that the reason Joon is currently losing money is that volumes have fallen in the plant and that the remaining products are having to carry an increasingly larger share of the overhead. This has caused some Joon product managers to raise prices. Senior managers realize that they must drive more volume into the plant if Joon is to return to profitability. Since organic growth (i.e., growth from existing products) is difficult due to a very competitive marketplace, management proposes to the board of directors the purchase of Snuffy as a way to drive additional volume into the plant. With volume of 60,000 cases and 1.9 direct labor hours per case, Snuffy's car care product line will add 114,000 direct labor hours to the plant and increase volume about 80 percent (114,000/143,000). This additional volume will significantly reduce the overhead the existing products must absorb and allow the product managers to lower prices. To incorporate Snuffy's manufacturing and distribution into Joon's current operations, Joon will have to incur additional fixed manufacturing overhead of $450,000 per year for new equipment, and $400,000 per year for additional SG A expenses.
Required:
a. Prepare a pro forma financial statement that shows Joon's financial performance (net income) for the most recent fiscal year assuming that Joon has already acquired Snuffy's car care products and has incorporated them into Joon's manufacturing and SG A processes. In preparing your analysis, make the following assumptions:
(i) Snuffy's products have the same fixed and variable cost structure as Joon's exisiting lines (i.e., variable overhead is $3.50 per direct labor hour and variable SG A is 20 percent of revenues).
(ii) The addition of Snuffy products does not change the demand for Joon's existing products.
(iii) There are no positive or negative externalities in manufacturing from having the additional Snuffy volume in the plant.
(iv) There is sufficient excess capacity in the plant and the local labor markets to absorb the additional Snuffy volume without causing labor rates or raw material prices to rise.
b. Based on your financial analysis in part ( a ), should Joon acquire Snuffy?
c. Evaluate management's arguments in favor of acquiring Snuffy.
d. What other advice would you offer Joon's management?
Introduction
Opening statement
Managements of businesses sometimes find themselves in a situation where a decision needs to be made as to whether it is profitable to acquire another business.
Acquisition of a business to increase volume
Sometimes, an unprofitable business needs to take a decision whether to acquire another business when it has excess capacity, but the volume is not adequate to absorb the fixed overheads. In this situation, the incremental financial effect of the acquisition should be computed. If the acquisition results in an incremental income, the acquisition should be implemented. However, the incremental income resulting from the acquisition should be discounted at the cost of capital over the average life of the combined assets of the acquiring and acquired businesses. If the NPV of the acquisition is positive, the acquisition is beneficial. Otherwise, it is not.
Concluding statement
The decision whether to acquire another business or not depends upon whether the two businesses combined would improve profitability and result in a net benefit to the combination of business entities. This is determined by discounted cash flow techniques.
a.
Proforma financial statement for the most recent fiscal year Introduction Opening statement Managements of businesses sometimes find themselves in a situation where a decision needs to be made as to whether it is profitable to acquire another business. Acquisition of a business to increase volume Sometimes, an unprofitable business needs to take a decision whether to acquire another business when it has excess capacity, but the volume is not adequate to absorb the fixed overheads. In this situation, the incremental financial effect of the acquisition should be computed. If the acquisition results in an incremental income, the acquisition should be implemented. However, the incremental income resulting from the acquisition should be discounted at the cost of capital over the average life of the combined assets of the acquiring and acquired businesses. If the NPV of the acquisition is positive, the acquisition is beneficial. Otherwise, it is not. Concluding statement The decision whether to acquire another business or not depends upon whether the two businesses combined would improve profitability and result in a net benefit to the combination of business entities. This is determined by discounted cash flow techniques. a. Proforma financial statement for the most recent fiscal year     b. Based on the financial analysis in (a.), the company should acquire the other business as it would yield an incremental net income of $1,868,500 instead of a net loss of $32,500. c. Management's arguments in favour of acquiring the other business are valid as it will add volume to the operations and result in a better absorption of fixed costs. d. Other points (advice) The proposed acquisition of another business entails an additional investment of $38 million. Whether this is profitable depends upon the present value of the incremental income resulting from the acquisition. Hence, discounted cash flow should be used to evaluate the investment of $38 million. The incremental income of 1,901,000 (1,868,500 + 32,500) should be discounted at the cost of the company's capital over the average life of the combined net assets of the company and the other business. The NPV (net present value) of the acquisition would be the ultimate criterion for the decision to acquire the other business. Introduction Opening statement Managements of businesses sometimes find themselves in a situation where a decision needs to be made as to whether it is profitable to acquire another business. Acquisition of a business to increase volume Sometimes, an unprofitable business needs to take a decision whether to acquire another business when it has excess capacity, but the volume is not adequate to absorb the fixed overheads. In this situation, the incremental financial effect of the acquisition should be computed. If the acquisition results in an incremental income, the acquisition should be implemented. However, the incremental income resulting from the acquisition should be discounted at the cost of capital over the average life of the combined assets of the acquiring and acquired businesses. If the NPV of the acquisition is positive, the acquisition is beneficial. Otherwise, it is not. Concluding statement The decision whether to acquire another business or not depends upon whether the two businesses combined would improve profitability and result in a net benefit to the combination of business entities. This is determined by discounted cash flow techniques. a. Proforma financial statement for the most recent fiscal year     b. Based on the financial analysis in (a.), the company should acquire the other business as it would yield an incremental net income of $1,868,500 instead of a net loss of $32,500. c. Management's arguments in favour of acquiring the other business are valid as it will add volume to the operations and result in a better absorption of fixed costs. d. Other points (advice) The proposed acquisition of another business entails an additional investment of $38 million. Whether this is profitable depends upon the present value of the incremental income resulting from the acquisition. Hence, discounted cash flow should be used to evaluate the investment of $38 million. The incremental income of 1,901,000 (1,868,500 + 32,500) should be discounted at the cost of the company's capital over the average life of the combined net assets of the company and the other business. The NPV (net present value) of the acquisition would be the ultimate criterion for the decision to acquire the other business. b.
Based on the financial analysis in (a.), the company should acquire the other business as it would yield an incremental net income of $1,868,500 instead of a net loss of $32,500.
c.
Management's arguments in favour of acquiring the other business are valid as it will add volume to the operations and result in a better absorption of fixed costs.
d.
Other points (advice)
The proposed acquisition of another business entails an additional investment of $38 million. Whether this is profitable depends upon the present value of the incremental income resulting from the acquisition. Hence, discounted cash flow should be used to evaluate the investment of $38 million. The incremental income of 1,901,000 (1,868,500 + 32,500) should be discounted at the cost of the company's capital over the average life of the combined net assets of the company and the other business. The NPV (net present value) of the acquisition would be the ultimate criterion for the decision to acquire the other business.
4
DIM
Diagnostic Imaging Medical (DIM) has introduced a revolutionary new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device that it sells to hospital radiology departments. Their new device has a much larger chamber that reduces patients' claustrophobic reactions compared to current machines. The following table displays how total cost per year varies with annual production. In other words, if DIM produces nine machines, the nine machines have a total manufacturing cost of $2.93 million. DIM Diagnostic Imaging Medical (DIM) has introduced a revolutionary new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device that it sells to hospital radiology departments. Their new device has a much larger chamber that reduces patients' claustrophobic reactions compared to current machines. The following table displays how total cost per year varies with annual production. In other words, if DIM produces nine machines, the nine machines have a total manufacturing cost of $2.93 million.   To simplify the analysis, assume DIM has no period costs, only the product costs in the above table. Management receives a bonus based on reported profits, where profits are calculated using absorption costing. Required: a. At a selling price of $500,000 per MRI, management expects to sell six units next year and plans to produce a few extra machines. The extra units are for training, marketing, and temporary spare parts in case an installed MRI fails and spare parts are needed. Management has financing and production capacity to vary production between 6 and 10 units. How many MRIs do you expect management to produce? Show your analysis that leads to this conclusion. b. Instead of expecting to sell six units at $500,000 each as in part ( a ), management expects to sell 11 units at $400,000 per unit. With expected sales at 11 units and a price of $400,000, DIM has the resources to produce between 11 and 15 MRIs. How many MRIs do you expect management to produce if expected sales are 11 units? Show your analysis that leads to this conclusion. c. Describe the differences and similarities in your answers to parts ( a ) and ( b ). Pay particular attention to the relation between units sold [6 in part ( a ) and 11 in part ( b )] and expected units produced, and how this relation differs or does not differ between parts ( a ) and ( b ). Also, explain what is causing your answers in parts ( a ) and ( b ) to differ or not differ. d. Provide some plausible explanations of why average costs may increase beyond a certain quantity of production. To simplify the analysis, assume DIM has no period costs, only the product costs in the above table. Management receives a bonus based on reported profits, where profits are calculated using absorption costing.
Required:
a. At a selling price of $500,000 per MRI, management expects to sell six units next year and plans to produce a few extra machines. The extra units are for training, marketing, and temporary spare parts in case an installed MRI fails and spare parts are needed. Management has financing and production capacity to vary production between 6 and 10 units. How many MRIs do you expect management to produce? Show your analysis that leads to this conclusion.
b. Instead of expecting to sell six units at $500,000 each as in part ( a ), management expects to sell 11 units at $400,000 per unit. With expected sales at 11 units and a price of $400,000, DIM has the resources to produce between 11 and 15 MRIs. How many MRIs do you expect management to produce if expected sales are 11 units? Show your analysis that leads to this conclusion.
c. Describe the differences and similarities in your answers to parts ( a ) and ( b ). Pay particular attention to the relation between units sold [6 in part ( a ) and 11 in part ( b )] and expected units produced, and how this relation differs or does not differ between parts ( a ) and ( b ). Also, explain what is causing your answers in parts ( a ) and ( b ) to differ or not differ.
d. Provide some plausible explanations of why average costs may increase beyond a certain quantity of production.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
Xerox
An October 25, 1999, article in Business Week by D. Brady, "Why Xerox Is Struggling," reported:
President and Chief Executive G. Richard Thoman is a big-picture guy. For the past two years, he has preached a digital revolution at the copier giant. Get down to the detail, though, and it's clear that the revolution isn't going as planned: In both copiers and printers, Xerox is losing ground. On October 18, the company announced lower than expected earnings and the stock price tumbled more than 13% on that day. Xerox stock is down 60% from its recent high of $60 in July. Xerox blamed the bad news on short-term surprises: sagging productivity in the sales force after a big reorganization as well as weakness in Brazil. But the sheer scope of bad news shocked even Thoman, who told investors in a conference call that he was "disappointed and sad about this quarter."
?Thoman took the top job in April and vowed annual earnings growth in the "mid-to-high teens."
?Beginning November 1, 1999, Xerox factories increased their hours from five eight-hour days a week to six ten-hour days a week through the end of the year. The factory managers were told to build inventories in expectation of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 1999. Fourth-quarter sales were expected to be higher because of anticipation that the new sales force reorganization would increase sales.
Required:
Offer an alternative reason(s) for Xerox's decision to increase output in its factories.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Easton Plant
The Easton plant produces sheet metal chassis for television sets. Its customer is General Electric Appliances. The chassis are manufactured on a computerized, numerically controlled (NC) machine that cuts, drills, and bends the metal to form the chassis for the television set. Two different chassis are produced: HX?3 and DX?55.
?Easton has a single plant wide overhead account. Actual machine minutes on the NC machine are used to distribute overhead to the two products. There were no beginning inventories of work in process or finished goods. The following table summarizes the planned and actual production data for the year: Easton Plant The Easton plant produces sheet metal chassis for television sets. Its customer is General Electric Appliances. The chassis are manufactured on a computerized, numerically controlled (NC) machine that cuts, drills, and bends the metal to form the chassis for the television set. Two different chassis are produced: HX?3 and DX?55. ?Easton has a single plant wide overhead account. Actual machine minutes on the NC machine are used to distribute overhead to the two products. There were no beginning inventories of work in process or finished goods. The following table summarizes the planned and actual production data for the year:   The following data summarize the flexible overhead budget:   At the end of the year, the following overhead amounts had been incurred:   Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. The ending finished goods inventory consists of 2,000 units of HX-3 and 1,000 units of DX-55, representing 13,400 minutes and 10,300 minutes of actual machine time, respectively. Required: (Round all dollars, including overhead rates, to two decimal places.) a. Calculate the overhead absorption rate set at the start of the year. b. Calculate the over-or under absorbed overhead for the year. c. The firm is considering switching to variable costing. What effect would this decision have on Easton's reported profit for this year? To implement variable costing at the end of the year, variable overhead is calculated as $3.00 per machine minute times the actual number of machine minutes. Fixed overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and variable overhead. d. Instead of defining fixed overhead as all overhead in excess of variable overhead as in part ( c ) , assume the following: Fixed overhead is budgeted fixed overhead ($820,000), and variable overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and budgeted fixed overhead. What is the difference between absorption net income and variable costing income given these new assumptions? The following data summarize the flexible overhead budget: Easton Plant The Easton plant produces sheet metal chassis for television sets. Its customer is General Electric Appliances. The chassis are manufactured on a computerized, numerically controlled (NC) machine that cuts, drills, and bends the metal to form the chassis for the television set. Two different chassis are produced: HX?3 and DX?55. ?Easton has a single plant wide overhead account. Actual machine minutes on the NC machine are used to distribute overhead to the two products. There were no beginning inventories of work in process or finished goods. The following table summarizes the planned and actual production data for the year:   The following data summarize the flexible overhead budget:   At the end of the year, the following overhead amounts had been incurred:   Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. The ending finished goods inventory consists of 2,000 units of HX-3 and 1,000 units of DX-55, representing 13,400 minutes and 10,300 minutes of actual machine time, respectively. Required: (Round all dollars, including overhead rates, to two decimal places.) a. Calculate the overhead absorption rate set at the start of the year. b. Calculate the over-or under absorbed overhead for the year. c. The firm is considering switching to variable costing. What effect would this decision have on Easton's reported profit for this year? To implement variable costing at the end of the year, variable overhead is calculated as $3.00 per machine minute times the actual number of machine minutes. Fixed overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and variable overhead. d. Instead of defining fixed overhead as all overhead in excess of variable overhead as in part ( c ) , assume the following: Fixed overhead is budgeted fixed overhead ($820,000), and variable overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and budgeted fixed overhead. What is the difference between absorption net income and variable costing income given these new assumptions? At the end of the year, the following overhead amounts had been incurred: Easton Plant The Easton plant produces sheet metal chassis for television sets. Its customer is General Electric Appliances. The chassis are manufactured on a computerized, numerically controlled (NC) machine that cuts, drills, and bends the metal to form the chassis for the television set. Two different chassis are produced: HX?3 and DX?55. ?Easton has a single plant wide overhead account. Actual machine minutes on the NC machine are used to distribute overhead to the two products. There were no beginning inventories of work in process or finished goods. The following table summarizes the planned and actual production data for the year:   The following data summarize the flexible overhead budget:   At the end of the year, the following overhead amounts had been incurred:   Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. The ending finished goods inventory consists of 2,000 units of HX-3 and 1,000 units of DX-55, representing 13,400 minutes and 10,300 minutes of actual machine time, respectively. Required: (Round all dollars, including overhead rates, to two decimal places.) a. Calculate the overhead absorption rate set at the start of the year. b. Calculate the over-or under absorbed overhead for the year. c. The firm is considering switching to variable costing. What effect would this decision have on Easton's reported profit for this year? To implement variable costing at the end of the year, variable overhead is calculated as $3.00 per machine minute times the actual number of machine minutes. Fixed overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and variable overhead. d. Instead of defining fixed overhead as all overhead in excess of variable overhead as in part ( c ) , assume the following: Fixed overhead is budgeted fixed overhead ($820,000), and variable overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and budgeted fixed overhead. What is the difference between absorption net income and variable costing income given these new assumptions? Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. The ending finished goods inventory consists of 2,000 units of HX-3 and 1,000 units of DX-55, representing 13,400 minutes and 10,300 minutes of actual machine time, respectively.
Required: (Round all dollars, including overhead rates, to two decimal places.)
a. Calculate the overhead absorption rate set at the start of the year.
b. Calculate the over-or under absorbed overhead for the year.
c. The firm is considering switching to variable costing. What effect would this decision have on Easton's reported profit for this year? To implement variable costing at the end of the year, variable overhead is calculated as $3.00 per machine minute times the actual number of machine minutes. Fixed overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and variable overhead.
d. Instead of defining fixed overhead as all overhead in excess of variable overhead as in part ( c ) , assume the following: Fixed overhead is budgeted fixed overhead ($820,000), and variable overhead is the difference between total actual overhead and budgeted fixed overhead. What is the difference between absorption net income and variable costing income given these new assumptions?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
Varilux
Varilux manufactures a single product and sells it for $10 per unit. At the beginning of the year, there were 1,000 units in inventory. Upon further investigation, you discover that units produced last year had $3 of fixed manufacturing costs and $2 of variable manufacturing costs. During the year, Varilux produced 10,000 units of product. Each unit produced generated $3 of variable manufacturing cost. Total fixed manufacturing cost for the current year was $40,000. Selling and administrative costs consisted of $12,000 of variable costs and $18,000 of fixed costs. There were no inventories at the end of the year.
Required:
Prepare two income statements for the current year: one on a variable cost basis and the other on an absorption cost basis. Explain any difference between the two net income numbers and provide calculations supporting your explanation of the difference.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Weststar Appliances
Weststar manufactures and distributes a complete line of home appliances worldwide. Lynn Tweedie is the U.S. Space Saver Dishwasher product manager for Weststar Appliances. Her responsibilities include pricing, planning, and sales of Weststar's Space Saver dishwasher in the United States. It is the end of the third quarter and Tweedie is deciding how many Space Saver washers to produce in the fourth quarter. Given sales from the first three quarters and orders for the last quarter, she expects total sales for the year to be 73,000 washers at $200 per unit. There are 12,000 washers in inventory at a (LIFO) cost of $90 per washer. The factory produced 58,000 washers in the first three quarters of this year and Tweedie is considering ordering an additional 10,000, 15,000, or 20,000 washers in the fourth quarter. The plant's capacity can easily accommodate any of these volume levels without affecting fixed costs or variable cost per unit. The variable manufacturing cost of the washer is $75 and the plant has fixed annual costs of $1.3 million. Manufacturing overhead is allocated to dishwashers based on units. Tweedie's selling and administrative expenses consist of $15 of variable cost per washer and fixed cost of $2.92 million. The dishwasher division has a 17 percent weighted-average cost of capital and invested capital (not including inventories) of $18 million. Weststar uses full absorption costing.
Required:
a. Prepare a table showing annual accounting earnings prepared under absorption costing for the Space Saver dishwasher for annual production levels of 68,000, 73,000, and 78,000 washers.
b. If Lynn Tweedie's bonus depends on reported accounting earnings from Space Saver dishwashers, what production quantity is she likely to select for the fourth quarter?
c. Prepare a table computing the valuation of the ending inventory (under LIFO) for annual production levels of 68,000, 73,000, and 78,000 washers.
d. If Lynn Tweedie's bonus depends on residual income from Space Saver dishwashers, what production quantity is she likely to select for the fourth quarter?
e. How would your answer change in part ( d ) if Tweedie's bonus was based on return on assets?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
Truini Paints
Using the data from Table 10?6, recast the analysis with one change of assumption: Instead of assuming that an additional $17,000 of overhead was incurred in both years, assume that overhead was lower each year by $10,000. How do incentives change regarding the treatment of the $10,000 savings?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Blauvelt Products
Blauvelt Products uses a flexible budget to set the overhead rate at the beginning of the year based on units produced. In year 1 budgeted fixed overhead is $1 million and budgeted variable overhead is $2 per unit. Direct material and direct labor together are $5 per unit. Blauvelt sells the completed product for $30. There is no beginning inventory. Budgeted volume is 80,000 units. Production and sales are 80,000 units. Actual overhead incurred in year 1 is $1,160,000. Any under-or overabsorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold.
?In year 2, budgeted volume and production are again both 80,000 units. However, only 60,000 units are sold. Budgeted fixed overhead is $1 million and budgeted variable overhead is $2 per unit. Direct material and direct labor are $5 per unit. Final selling price remains at $30 per unit. Actual overhead incurred in year 2 is $1.35 million.
Required:
a. Calculate net income in year 1 first using absorption costing and then using variable costing. Explain any difference between the two net income numbers.
b. Calculate net income in year 2 using absorption costing, where the overhead rate used to assign overhead to products is based on actual overhead incurred.
c. Calculate net income in year 2 using variable costing, where any difference between budgeted overhead and actual overhead is treated as a fixed cost.
d. Calculate net income in year 2 using variable costing, where any difference between budgeted overhead and actual overhead is treated as a variable cost.
e. Explain why your answers in parts ( b ) , ( c ) , and ( d ) differ.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
Zipp Cards
Zipp Cards buys baseball cards in bulk from the companies that produce them. Zipp buys sheets of 48 cards, then cuts the sheets into individual cards, and sorts and packages them, usually by team. Zipp then sells the packages to large discount stores. The accompanying table provides information regarding operations for 2010 and 2011. Zipp Cards Zipp Cards buys baseball cards in bulk from the companies that produce them. Zipp buys sheets of 48 cards, then cuts the sheets into individual cards, and sorts and packages them, usually by team. Zipp then sells the packages to large discount stores. The accompanying table provides information regarding operations for 2010 and 2011.   *One unit equals 48 cards. ?Volume is measured in terms of 48-card sheets processed. Budgeted production and actual production in 2010 were both 50,000 units. There were no beginning inventories on January 1, 2010. In 2011, budgeted and actual production rose to 75,000 units. ?At the beginning of 2012, the president of Zipp was pleasantly surprised when the accountant showed her the income statement for the year 2011. The president remarked, I'm surprised we made more money in 2011 than 2010. We had to cut prices and we didn't sell as many units, yet we still made more money. Well, you're the accountant and these numbers don't lie. Required: a. Prepare income statements for 2010 and 2011 using absorption costing. b. Prepare a statement reconciling the change in net income from 2010 to 2011. Explain to the president why the firm made more money in 2011 than in 2010. *One unit equals 48 cards.
?Volume is measured in terms of 48-card sheets processed. Budgeted production and actual production in 2010 were both 50,000 units. There were no beginning inventories on January 1, 2010. In 2011, budgeted and actual production rose to 75,000 units.
?At the beginning of 2012, the president of Zipp was pleasantly surprised when the accountant showed her the income statement for the year 2011. The president remarked, "I'm surprised we made more money in 2011 than 2010. We had to cut prices and we didn't sell as many units, yet we still made more money. Well, you're the accountant and these numbers don't lie."
Required:
a. Prepare income statements for 2010 and 2011 using absorption costing.
b. Prepare a statement reconciling the change in net income from 2010 to 2011. Explain to the president why the firm made more money in 2011 than in 2010.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
UniCom
UniCom produces a wide range of consumer electronics. UniCom's Newark, New York, plant produces two types of cordless phones: 2.4 GHz and 6.0 GHz. The following table summarizes operations at the Newark UniCom plant for the years 2009 and 2010. UniCom UniCom produces a wide range of consumer electronics. UniCom's Newark, New York, plant produces two types of cordless phones: 2.4 GHz and 6.0 GHz. The following table summarizes operations at the Newark UniCom plant for the years 2009 and 2010.   Fixed manufacturing overhead amounted to $4 million in each year. At the start of 2009, there were no beginning inventories of either 2.4-GHz or 6.0-GHz cordless phones. UniCom uses FIFO to value inventories. Required: a. Prepare variable costing income statements for 2009 and 2010. b. Prepare absorption costing income statements for 2009 and 2010. At the end of the year, fixed manufacturing overhead is absorbed to the two phone models using direct material as the allocation base. c. Prepare a table that reconciles any differences in variable costing and absorption costing net incomes for 2009 and 2010. Fixed manufacturing overhead amounted to $4 million in each year. At the start of 2009, there were no beginning inventories of either 2.4-GHz or 6.0-GHz cordless phones. UniCom uses FIFO to value inventories.
Required:
a. Prepare variable costing income statements for 2009 and 2010.
b. Prepare absorption costing income statements for 2009 and 2010. At the end of the year, fixed manufacturing overhead is absorbed to the two phone models using direct material as the allocation base.
c. Prepare a table that reconciles any differences in variable costing and absorption costing net incomes for 2009 and 2010.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
Transpacific Bank
You are working as a loan officer at Transpacific Bank and are analyzing a loan request for a client when you come across the following footnote in the client's annual report:
Inventories are priced at the lower of cost or market of materials plus other direct (variable) costs. Fixed overheads of $4.2 million this year and $3.0 million last year are excluded from inventories. Omitting such overhead resulted in a reduction in net income (after taxes) of $720,000 for this year. Our tax rate is 40 percent.
?In preparing to present the loan application to the bank's loan committee, write a brief paragraph in nontechnical terms describing what this footnote means and how it affects the bank's evaluation of the financial condition of the borrower.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Sants Brakes Co.
The current year's income statement for Sants Brakes Co. on a variable costing basis appears in the accompanying table. Sants Brakes Co. The current year's income statement for Sants Brakes Co. on a variable costing basis appears in the accompanying table.   ?Inventories of finished stock were increased during the year in anticipation of increases in sales volume in the current year. Inventories in units of product for the beginning and end of the year follow.   ?The budgeted operating level for assigning fixed overhead to production is 1.8 million machine hours. One-half hour is required to produce a unit of G-226, two hours are required for a unit of G-348, and four hours are required for a unit of G-714. Required: a. Recast the income statement on an absorption costing basis. b. Explain why the income from manufacturing on the absorption costing statement differs from the income on the variable costing statement. Show your computations. ?Inventories of finished stock were increased during the year in anticipation of increases in sales volume in the current year. Inventories in units of product for the beginning and end of the year follow. Sants Brakes Co. The current year's income statement for Sants Brakes Co. on a variable costing basis appears in the accompanying table.   ?Inventories of finished stock were increased during the year in anticipation of increases in sales volume in the current year. Inventories in units of product for the beginning and end of the year follow.   ?The budgeted operating level for assigning fixed overhead to production is 1.8 million machine hours. One-half hour is required to produce a unit of G-226, two hours are required for a unit of G-348, and four hours are required for a unit of G-714. Required: a. Recast the income statement on an absorption costing basis. b. Explain why the income from manufacturing on the absorption costing statement differs from the income on the variable costing statement. Show your computations. ?The budgeted operating level for assigning fixed overhead to production is 1.8 million machine hours. One-half hour is required to produce a unit of G-226, two hours are required for a unit of G-348, and four hours are required for a unit of G-714.
Required:
a. Recast the income statement on an absorption costing basis.
b. Explain why the income from manufacturing on the absorption costing statement differs from the income on the variable costing statement. Show your computations.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Zeflax Bottles
Zeflax manufactures insulated plastic bottles for bikes that the company sells for $4.00 per bottle. Last year the company produced 230,000 bottles and sold 200,000 bottles. This year Zeflax produced 200,000 bottles and sold 230,000 bottles. In both years Zeflax's fixed manufacturing cost was $500,000 and its variable manufacturing cost was $1.00 per bottle. The president of Zeflax commented, "I don't understand these crazy financial statements. Our prices and costs didn't change, we sell more bottles this year, and we show lower income. Something has got to be wrong."
Required:
a. Prepare income statements for Zeflax for last year and this year using absorption costing. Assume that Zeflax's only costs are the fixed and variable manufacturing costs given in the problem.
b. Prepare income statements for Zeflax for last year and this year using variable costing. Assume that Zeflax's only costs are the fixed and variable manufacturing costs given in the problem.
c. Explain to the president of Zeflax in nontechnical terms why the financial statements prepared by the accountant in part ( a ) are not in error. In other words, explain to the president why net income fell this year from last year even though Zeflax sold more bottles.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
Alliance Tooling
Alliance Tooling produces a single product in its plant. At the beginning of the year, there were no units in inventory. During the year, Alliance produced 120,000 units and sold 100,000 units at $26.75 per unit. Variable manufacturing costs are $13.50 per unit. Alliance pays $2.70 per unit for sales commissions and shipping. It has fixed costs of $720,000 for selling and administration. Its tax rate is 40 percent.
Required:
a. Prepare an income statement for Alliance Tooling using absorption costing.
b. Prepare an income statement for Alliance Tooling using variable costing.
c. Explain why the net income figures computed in ( a ) and ( b ) differ.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
Aspen View
Aspen View produces a full line of sunglasses. This year it began producing a new model of sunglasses, the Peak 32. It produced 5,300 pairs and sold 4,900 pairs. The following table summarizes the fixed and variable costs of producing Peak 32 sunglasses. Aspen View uses variable costing to value its ending inventory. Aspen View Aspen View produces a full line of sunglasses. This year it began producing a new model of sunglasses, the Peak 32. It produced 5,300 pairs and sold 4,900 pairs. The following table summarizes the fixed and variable costs of producing Peak 32 sunglasses. Aspen View uses variable costing to value its ending inventory.   Required: a. What is Aspen View's ending inventory value of Peak 32 sunglasses? b. Aspen View is considering switching from variable costing to absorption costing. Would this year's net income from Peak 32 sunglasses be higher or lower using absorption costing? Explain why. c. Suppose Aspen View uses absorption costing. If, instead of producing 5,300 pairs of Peak 32s it produced only 5,000, would net income from Peak 32 sunglasses be higher or lower from the smaller production compared to the larger production? Explain why. d. Aspen View has an opportunity cost of capital of 20 percent. What is the cost of producing 5,300 pairs of Peak 32s instead of 4,900 pairs? Required:
a. What is Aspen View's ending inventory value of Peak 32 sunglasses?
b. Aspen View is considering switching from variable costing to absorption costing. Would this year's net income from Peak 32 sunglasses be higher or lower using absorption costing? Explain why.
c. Suppose Aspen View uses absorption costing. If, instead of producing 5,300 pairs of Peak 32s it produced only 5,000, would net income from Peak 32 sunglasses be higher or lower from the smaller production compared to the larger production? Explain why.
d. Aspen View has an opportunity cost of capital of 20 percent. What is the cost of producing 5,300 pairs of Peak 32s instead of 4,900 pairs?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
CLIC Lighters
CLIC manufactures two types of cigarette lighters: Basic and Super. A new plant began producing both lighter models this year. The following variable costing statement summarizes the first year of operations: CLIC Lighters CLIC manufactures two types of cigarette lighters: Basic and Super. A new plant began producing both lighter models this year. The following variable costing statement summarizes the first year of operations:   ?For internal control purposes, variable costing is used. Management also wants income from manufacturing calculated using absorption costing. Fixed overhead is allocated to the two lighters using actual machine minutes. Each Basic lighter requires 1.1 machine minutes and each Super lighter requires 1.2 machine minutes. Required: a. Calculate the fixed overhead rate per machine minute. b. Calculate the plant's income from manufacturing for both Basic and Super lighters and for the entire plant using absorption costing. c. Prepare a table that reconciles the difference in income from manufacturing reported using variable costing and absorption costing. d. Explain in one or two sentences why income from manufacturing differs depending on whether variable costing or absorption costing is used. ?For internal control purposes, variable costing is used. Management also wants income from manufacturing calculated using absorption costing. Fixed overhead is allocated to the two lighters using actual machine minutes. Each Basic lighter requires 1.1 machine minutes and each Super lighter requires 1.2 machine minutes.
Required:
a. Calculate the fixed overhead rate per machine minute.
b. Calculate the plant's income from manufacturing for both Basic and Super lighters and for the entire plant using absorption costing.
c. Prepare a table that reconciles the difference in income from manufacturing reported using variable costing and absorption costing.
d. Explain in one or two sentences why income from manufacturing differs depending on whether variable costing or absorption costing is used.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
Medford Mug Company
The Medford Mug Company is an old-line maker of ceramic coffee mugs. It imprints company logos and other sayings on mugs for both commercial and wholesale markets. The firm has the capacity to produce 50 million mugs per year, but the recession has cut production and sales in the current year to 15 million mugs. The accompanying table shows the operating statement for 2010. Medford Mug Company The Medford Mug Company is an old-line maker of ceramic coffee mugs. It imprints company logos and other sayings on mugs for both commercial and wholesale markets. The firm has the capacity to produce 50 million mugs per year, but the recession has cut production and sales in the current year to 15 million mugs. The accompanying table shows the operating statement for 2010.   At the end of 2010, there was no ending inventory of finished goods. ?The board of directors is very concerned about the $1.5 million operating loss. It hires an outside consultant who reports back that the firm suffers from two problems. First, the president of the company receives a fixed salary, and since she owns no stock, she has very little incentive to worry about company profits. The second problem is that the company has not aggressively marketed its product and has not kept up with changing markets. The current president is 64 and the board of directors makes her an offer to retire one year early so that they can hire a new president to turn the firm around. The current president accepts the offer to retire and the board immediately hires a new president with a proven track record as a turnaround specialist. ?The new president is hired with an employment contract that pays a fixed wage of $50,000 a year plus 15 percent of the firm's operating profits (if any). Operating profits are calculated using absorption costing. In 2011, the new president doubles the selling and administration budget to $8 million (which includes the president's salary of $50,000). He designs a new line of politically correct sayings to imprint on the mugs and expands inventory and the number of distributors handling the mugs. Production is increased to 45 million mugs and sales climb to 18 million mugs at $2 each. Variable costs per mug remain at $.50 and fixed costs at $20 million in 2011. ?At the end of 2011, the president meets with the board of directors and announces he has accepted another job. He believes he has successfully gotten Medford Mug back on track and thanks the board for giving him the opportunity. His new job is helping to turn around another struggling company. Required: a. Calculate the president's bonus for 2011. b. Evaluate the performance of the new president in 2011. Did he do as good a job as the numbers in ( a ) suggest? At the end of 2010, there was no ending inventory of finished goods.
?The board of directors is very concerned about the $1.5 million operating loss. It hires an outside consultant who reports back that the firm suffers from two problems. First, the president of the company receives a fixed salary, and since she owns no stock, she has very little incentive to worry about company profits. The second problem is that the company has not aggressively marketed its product and has not kept up with changing markets. The current president is 64 and the board of directors makes her an offer to retire one year early so that they can hire a new president to turn the firm around. The current president accepts the offer to retire and the board immediately hires a new president with a proven track record as a turnaround specialist.
?The new president is hired with an employment contract that pays a fixed wage of $50,000 a year plus 15 percent of the firm's operating profits (if any). Operating profits are calculated using absorption costing. In 2011, the new president doubles the selling and administration budget to $8 million (which includes the president's salary of $50,000). He designs a new line of "politically correct" sayings to imprint on the mugs and expands inventory and the number of distributors handling the mugs. Production is increased to 45 million mugs and sales climb to 18 million mugs at $2 each. Variable costs per mug remain at $.50 and fixed costs at $20 million in 2011.
?At the end of 2011, the president meets with the board of directors and announces he has accepted another job. He believes he has successfully gotten Medford Mug back on track and thanks the board for giving him the opportunity. His new job is helping to turn around another struggling company.
Required:
a. Calculate the president's bonus for 2011.
b. Evaluate the performance of the new president in 2011. Did he do as good a job as the numbers in ( a ) suggest?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
Kothari Inc.
The telecom division of Kothari Inc. produces and sells 100,000 line modulators. Half of the modulators are sold externally at $150 per unit, and the other half are sold internally at variable manufacturing costs plus 10 percent. Kothari uses variable costing to evaluate the telecom division. The following summarizes the cost structure of the telecom division. Kothari Inc. The telecom division of Kothari Inc. produces and sells 100,000 line modulators. Half of the modulators are sold externally at $150 per unit, and the other half are sold internally at variable manufacturing costs plus 10 percent. Kothari uses variable costing to evaluate the telecom division. The following summarizes the cost structure of the telecom division.   Required: a. Calculate the net income of the telecom division (before taxes) using variable costing. b. Telecom can outsource the final assembly of all 100,000 modulators for $9.00 per modulator. If it does this, it can reduce variable manufacturing cost by $1.00 per unit and fixed manufacturing overhead by $700,000. If the managers of the telecom unit are compensated based on telecom's net income before taxes, do you expect them to outsource the final assembly of the modulators? Show calculations. c. What happens to the net cash flows of Kothari Inc. if the final assembly of the modulators is outsourced? Required:
a. Calculate the net income of the telecom division (before taxes) using variable costing.
b. Telecom can outsource the final assembly of all 100,000 modulators for $9.00 per modulator. If it does this, it can reduce variable manufacturing cost by $1.00 per unit and fixed manufacturing overhead by $700,000. If the managers of the telecom unit are compensated based on telecom's net income before taxes, do you expect them to outsource the final assembly of the modulators? Show calculations.
c. What happens to the net cash flows of Kothari Inc. if the final assembly of the modulators is outsourced?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
Mystic Mugs
Sanjog and Rajiv Gupta have started a business that manufactures and sells thermal mugs. Users personalize the mugs by plugging them into a laptop and downloading their favorite images from a digital camera. The company makes two mug sizes: 16 and 24 ounce mugs. This is its first year of business. The following data summarize operations for the first year. Mystic Mugs Sanjog and Rajiv Gupta have started a business that manufactures and sells thermal mugs. Users personalize the mugs by plugging them into a laptop and downloading their favorite images from a digital camera. The company makes two mug sizes: 16 and 24 ounce mugs. This is its first year of business. The following data summarize operations for the first year.   There were no beginning inventories. Overhead is assigned to products using direct labor dollars. Required: a. Calculate Mystic Mugs's net income before taxes using absorption costing. b. Calculate Mystic Mugs's net income before taxes using variable costing. c. Prepare a table that reconciles any difference between the two net income figures calculated in parts ( a ) and ( b ). d. Write a short memo explaining in lay terms any difference between the two net income figures calculated in parts ( a ) and ( b ). There were no beginning inventories. Overhead is assigned to products using direct labor dollars.
Required:
a. Calculate Mystic Mugs's net income before taxes using absorption costing.
b. Calculate Mystic Mugs's net income before taxes using variable costing.
c. Prepare a table that reconciles any difference between the two net income figures calculated in parts ( a ) and ( b ).
d. Write a short memo explaining in lay terms any difference between the two net income figures calculated in parts ( a ) and ( b ).
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
Avant Designs
Avant Designs designs and manufactures polished-nickel fashion bracelets. It offers two bracelets: Aztec and Mayan. The following data summarize budgeted operations for the current year: Avant Designs Avant Designs designs and manufactures polished-nickel fashion bracelets. It offers two bracelets: Aztec and Mayan. The following data summarize budgeted operations for the current year:   Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead for the year was $258,000. Required: a. Prepare the budgeted income statement for the year using variable costing. b. Prepare the budgeted income statement for the year using absorption costing. Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead is allocated to the two bracelets using machine minutes. c. Explain the difference in the two net income figures computed in parts ( a ) and ( b ). That is, reconcile any difference in earnings and explain why it occurs. Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead for the year was $258,000.
Required:
a. Prepare the budgeted income statement for the year using variable costing.
b. Prepare the budgeted income statement for the year using absorption costing. Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead is allocated to the two bracelets using machine minutes.
c. Explain the difference in the two net income figures computed in parts ( a ) and ( b ). That is, reconcile any difference in earnings and explain why it occurs.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
Taylor Chains
Taylor designs and manufactures high-performance bicycle chains for professional racers and serious amateurs. Two new titanium chain sets, the Challenger and the Tour, sell for €110 and €155, respectively. The following data summarize the cost structure for the two chain sets: Taylor Chains Taylor designs and manufactures high-performance bicycle chains for professional racers and serious amateurs. Two new titanium chain sets, the Challenger and the Tour, sell for €110 and €155, respectively. The following data summarize the cost structure for the two chain sets:   ?Taylor uses an absorption costing system. Overhead is applied to these two products based on direct labor hours using a flexible budget to calculate the overhead rate before production begins for the year. Taylor budgeted (and produced) 43,000 Challenger chains and 55,000 Tour chains. Fixed manufacturing overhead was estimated to be €1.65 million and variable manufacturing overhead was estimated to be €1.75 per direct labor hour. Actual overhead incurred amounted to €2.1 million. Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. Required: a. Calculate the overhead rate Taylor used to absorb overhead to the chains. b. Using the predetermined overhead rate you calculated in ( a ), and assuming any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold, calculate Taylor Chains' net income before taxes for both the Challenger and Tour chains and for the entire firm. c. Instead of using absorption costing, use variable costing to calculate Taylor Chains' net income before taxes for both the Challenger and Tour chains and for the entire firm. Assume that any over-or under absorbed overhead is treated as a fixed cost and is written off to cost of goods sold. d. Explain why the net income numbers calculated in parts ( b ) and ( c ) differ and reconcile the difference numerically. e. Suppose that next year Taylor incurs total manufacturing overhead of €2.3 million and sells all the chains it produces next year as well as the 6,000 chains it had in inventory from the first year of production. How much manufacturing overhead will appear on Taylor's income statement if the company uses (i) absorption costing or (ii) variable costing? ?Taylor uses an absorption costing system. Overhead is applied to these two products based on direct labor hours using a flexible budget to calculate the overhead rate before production begins for the year. Taylor budgeted (and produced) 43,000 Challenger chains and 55,000 Tour chains. Fixed manufacturing overhead was estimated to be €1.65 million and variable manufacturing overhead was estimated to be €1.75 per direct labor hour. Actual overhead incurred amounted to €2.1 million. Any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold.
Required:
a. Calculate the overhead rate Taylor used to absorb overhead to the chains.
b. Using the predetermined overhead rate you calculated in ( a ), and assuming any over-or under absorbed overhead is written off to cost of goods sold, calculate Taylor Chains' net income before taxes for both the Challenger and Tour chains and for the entire firm.
c. Instead of using absorption costing, use variable costing to calculate Taylor Chains' net income before taxes for both the Challenger and Tour chains and for the entire firm. Assume that any over-or under absorbed overhead is treated as a fixed cost and is written off to cost of goods sold.
d. Explain why the net income numbers calculated in parts ( b ) and ( c ) differ and reconcile the difference numerically.
e. Suppose that next year Taylor incurs total manufacturing overhead of €2.3 million and sells all the chains it produces next year as well as the 6,000 chains it had in inventory from the first year of production. How much manufacturing overhead will appear on Taylor's income statement if the company uses (i) absorption costing or (ii) variable costing?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 23 flashcards in this deck.