Deck 19: Capital Investment

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
PAYBACK AND ARR
Each of the following scenarios is independent. All cash flows are after-tax cash flows.
Required:
1. Jim Larsen has purchased a tractor for $125,000. He expects to receive a net cash flow of $31,250 per year from the investment. What is the payback period for Jim?
2. Sam Rutter invested $240,000 in a laundromat. The facility has a 10-year life expectancy with no expected salvage value. The laundromat will produce a net cash flow of $72,000 per year. What is the accounting rate of return?
3. Patricia Piel has purchased a business building for $280,000. She expects to receive the following cash flows over a 10-year period: Year 1: $35,000 Year 2: $49,000 Years 3-10: $70,000 What is the payback period for Patricia? What is the accounting rate of return?
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
Advanced Technology, Payback, NPV, IRR, Sensitivity Analysis
Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows:
Advanced Technology, Payback, NPV, IRR, Sensitivity Analysis Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows:   The system will cost $9,000,000 and last 10 years. The company's cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchased-even if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of $1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of $300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the company's decision?<div style=padding-top: 35px>
The system will cost $9,000,000 and last 10 years. The company's cost of capital is 12 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired?
2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchased-even if it does not meet the payback criterion?
3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of $1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of $300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the company's decision?
Question
Explain how the NPV is used to determine whether a project should be accepted or rejected.
Question
NPV Versus IRR
Covington Pharmacies has decided to automate its insurance claims process. Two networked computer systems are being considered. The systems have an expected life of two years. The net cash flows associated with the systems are as follows. The cash benefits represent the savings created by switching from a manual to an automated system.
NPV Versus IRR Covington Pharmacies has decided to automate its insurance claims process. Two networked computer systems are being considered. The systems have an expected life of two years. The net cash flows associated with the systems are as follows. The cash benefits represent the savings created by switching from a manual to an automated system.   The company's cost of capital is 10 percent. Required: 1. Compute the NPV and the IRR for each investment. 2. Show that the project with the larger NPV is the correct choice for the company.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
The company's cost of capital is 10 percent.
Required:
1. Compute the NPV and the IRR for each investment.
2. Show that the project with the larger NPV is the correct choice for the company.
Question
(Appendix A) Future Value, Present Value
The following cases are each independent of the others.
Required:
1. Sam Lilliam places $5,000 in a savings account that pays 3 percent. Suppose Sam leaves the original deposit plus any interest in the account for two years. How much will Sam have in savings after two years?
2. Suppose that the parents of a 12-year-old son want to have $80,000 in a fund six years from now to provide support for his college education. How much must they invest now to have the desired amount if the investment can earn 4 percent? 6 percent? 8 percent?
3. Killian Manufacturing is asking $500,000 for automated equipment, which is expected to last six years and will generate equal annual net cash inflows (because of reductions in labor costs, material waste, and so on). What is the minimum cash inflow that must be realized each year to justify the acquisition? The cost of capital is 8 percent.
Question
Computation of After-Tax Cash Flows
Postman Company is considering two independent projects. One project involves a new product line, and the other involves the acquisition of forklifts for the Materials Handling Department. The projected annual operating revenues and expenses are as follows:
Computation of After-Tax Cash Flows Postman Company is considering two independent projects. One project involves a new product line, and the other involves the acquisition of forklifts for the Materials Handling Department. The projected annual operating revenues and expenses are as follows:     Required: Compute the after-tax cash flows of each project. The tax rate is 40 percent and includes federal and state assessments.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Computation of After-Tax Cash Flows Postman Company is considering two independent projects. One project involves a new product line, and the other involves the acquisition of forklifts for the Materials Handling Department. The projected annual operating revenues and expenses are as follows:     Required: Compute the after-tax cash flows of each project. The tax rate is 40 percent and includes federal and state assessments.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Required:
Compute the after-tax cash flows of each project. The tax rate is 40 percent and includes federal and state assessments.
Question
PAYBACK PERIOD
Lorie Christian is considering investing in either a storage facility or a car wash facility. Both projects have a five-year life and require an investment of $240,000. The cash flow patterns for each project are given below. Storage facility: Even cash flows of $80,000 per year. Car wash: $75,000, $95,000, $40,000, $80,000, and $60,000.
Required:
1. Calculate the payback period for the storage facility (even cash flows).
2. Calculate the payback period for the car wash facility (uneven cash flows). Which project should be accepted based on payback analysis? Explain.
3. What if a third mutually exclusive project, a laundry facility, became available with the same investment and annual cash flows of $100,000? Now which project would be chosen?
Question
Explain why NPV is generally preferred over IRR when choosing among competing or mutually exclusive projects. Why would managers continue to use IRR to choose among mutually exclusive projects?
Question
MACRS, NPV
Lilly Company is planning to buy a set of special tools for its grinding operation. The cost of the tools is $18,000. The tools have a three-year life and qualify for the use of the three-year MACRS. The tax rate is 40 percent; the cost of capital is 12 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the present value of the tax depreciation shield, assuming that straight-line depreciation with a half-year life is used.
2. Calculate the present value of the tax depreciation shield, assuming that MACRS is used.
3. What is the benefit to the company of using MACRS?
Question
Explain the difference between independent projects and mutually exclusive projects.
Question
NPV AND IRR Each of the following scenarios is independent. All cash flows are after-tax cash flows.
Required:
1. Wetzel Corporation is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The cash benefits will be $600,000 per year. The system costs $3,600,000 and will last eight years. Compute the NPV assuming a discount rate of 10 percent. Should the company buy the new system?
2. Nephi Swasey has just invested $540,000 in a restaurant specializing in German food. He expects to receive $86,940 per year for the next eight years. His cost of capital is 5.5 percent. Compute the internal rate of return. Did Nephi make a good decision?
Question
POLLUTION PREVENTION, P2 INVESTMENT
Lewis Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Lewis uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly.
Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but it would also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality. The closed-loop system would produce only four pounds of sludge, and the sludge would be virtually pure metal, with significant market value. The system requires an investment of $420,000 and will cost $30,000 in increased annual operation plus an annual purchase of $5,000 of filtration medium. However, management projects the following savings:
POLLUTION PREVENTION, P2 INVESTMENT Lewis Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Lewis uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly. Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but it would also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality. The closed-loop system would produce only four pounds of sludge, and the sludge would be virtually pure metal, with significant market value. The system requires an investment of $420,000 and will cost $30,000 in increased annual operation plus an annual purchase of $5,000 of filtration medium. However, management projects the following savings:   The equipment qualifies as a seven-year MACRS asset. Management has decided to use straight-line depreciation for tax purposes, using the required half-year convention. The tax rate is 40 percent. The projected life of the system is 10 years. The hurdle rate is 16 percent for all capital budgeting projects, although the company's cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Based on the financial data provided, prepare a schedule of expected cash flows. 2. What is the payback period? 3. Calculate the NPV of the closed-loop system. Should the company invest in the system? 4. The calculation in Requirement 3 ignored several factors that could affect the project's viability: savings from avoiding the annual fines, positive effect on sales due to favorable environmental publicity, increased plating quality from the new system, and the avoidance of the lawsuit. Can these factors be quantified? If so, should they have been included in the analysis? Suppose, for example, that the annual fines being incurred are $50,000, the sales effect is $40,000 per year, the quality effect is not estimable, and that cancellation of the lawsuit because of the new system would avoid an expected settlement at the end of Year 3 (including legal fees) of $200,000. Assuming these are all after-tax amounts, what effect would their inclusion have on the payback period? On the NPV?<div style=padding-top: 35px>
The equipment qualifies as a seven-year MACRS asset. Management has decided to use straight-line depreciation for tax purposes, using the required half-year convention. The tax rate is 40 percent. The projected life of the system is 10 years. The hurdle rate is 16 percent for all capital budgeting projects, although the company's cost of capital is 12 percent.
Required:
1. Based on the financial data provided, prepare a schedule of expected cash flows.
2. What is the payback period?
3. Calculate the NPV of the closed-loop system. Should the company invest in the system?
4. The calculation in Requirement 3 ignored several factors that could affect the project's viability: savings from avoiding the annual fines, positive effect on sales due to favorable environmental publicity, increased plating quality from the new system, and the avoidance of the lawsuit. Can these factors be quantified? If so, should they have been included in the analysis? Suppose, for example, that the annual fines being incurred are $50,000, the sales effect is $40,000 per year, the quality effect is not estimable, and that cancellation of the lawsuit because of the new system would avoid an expected settlement at the end of Year 3 (including legal fees) of $200,000. Assuming these are all after-tax amounts, what effect would their inclusion have on the payback period? On the NPV?
Question
ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN
Ferguson Medical, Inc., is planning on investing in some new echocardiogram equipment that will require an initial outlay of $100,000. The system has an expected life of five years and no expected salvage value. The investment is expected to produce the following net cash flows over its life: $40,000, $40,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $60,000.
Required:
1. Calculate the annual net income for each of the five years.
2. Calculate the accounting rate of return.
3. What if a second competing revenue-producing investment has the same initial outlay and salvage value but the following cash flows (in chronological sequence): $60,000, $60,000, $60,000, $40,000, and $10,000? Using the accounting rate of return metric, which project should be selected: the first or the second? Which project is really the better of the two?
Question
Why is it important to have accurate projections of cash flows for potential capital investments?
Question
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment
Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows:
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows:   The company uses a discount rate of 18 percent for all of its investments. The company's cost of capital is 14 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the net present value for each investment using a discount rate of 18 percent. 2. Calculate the net present value for each investment using a discount rate of 14 percent. 3. Which rate should the company use to compute the net present value? Explain. 4. Now, assume that if the traditional equipment is purchased, the competitive position of the firm will deteriorate because of lower quality (relative to competitors who did automate). Marketing estimates that the loss in market share will decrease the projected net cash inflows by 50 percent for Years 3-10. Recalculate the NPV of the traditional equipment given this outcome. What is the decision now? Discuss the importance of assessing the effect of intangible and indirect benefits.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
The company uses a discount rate of 18 percent for all of its investments. The company's cost of capital is 14 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the net present value for each investment using a discount rate of 18 percent.
2. Calculate the net present value for each investment using a discount rate of 14 percent.
3. Which rate should the company use to compute the net present value? Explain.
4. Now, assume that if the traditional equipment is purchased, the competitive position of the firm will deteriorate because of lower quality (relative to competitors who did automate). Marketing estimates that the loss in market share will decrease the projected net cash inflows by 50 percent for Years 3-10. Recalculate the NPV of the traditional equipment given this outcome. What is the decision now? Discuss the importance of assessing the effect of intangible and indirect benefits.
Question
Explain why the timing and quantity of cash flows are important in capital investment decisions.
Question
BASIC CONCEPTS
Roberts Company is considering an investment in equipment that is capable of producing more efficiently than the current technology. The outlay required is $1,638,000. The equipment is expected to last five years and will have no salvage value. The expected cash flows associated with the project are as follows:
BASIC CONCEPTS Roberts Company is considering an investment in equipment that is capable of producing more efficiently than the current technology. The outlay required is $1,638,000. The equipment is expected to last five years and will have no salvage value. The expected cash flows associated with the project are as follows:   Required: 1. Compute the project's payback period. 2. Compute the project's accounting rate of return. 3. Compute the project's net present value, assuming a required rate of return of 10 percent. 4. Compute the project's internal rate of return<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Required:
1. Compute the project's payback period.
2. Compute the project's accounting rate of return.
3. Compute the project's net present value, assuming a required rate of return of 10 percent.
4. Compute the project's internal rate of return
Question
Competing P2 Investments
Ron Booth, the CEO for Sunders Manufacturing, was wondering which of two pollution control systems he should choose. The firm's current production process produces a gaseous and a liquid residue. A recent state law mandated that emissions of these residues be reduced to levels considerably below current performance. Failure to reduce the emissions would invoke stiff fines and possible closure of the operating plant. Fortunately, the new law provided a transition period, and Ron had used the time wisely. His engineers had developed two separate proposals. The first proposal involved the acquisition of scrubbers for gaseous emissions and a treatment facility to remove the liquid residues. The second proposal was more radical. It entailed the redesign of the manufacturing process and the acquisition of new production equipment to support this new design. The new process would solve the environmental problem by avoiding the production of residues.
Although the equipment for each proposal normally would qualify as seven-year property, the state managed to obtain an agreement with the federal government to allow any pollution abatement equipment to qualify as five-year property. State tax law follows federal guidelines. Both proposals qualify for the five-year property benefit.
Ron's vice president of marketing has projected an increase in revenues because of favorable environmental performance publicity. This increase is the result of selling more of Sunders's products to environmentally conscious customers. However, because the second approach is "greener," the vice president believes that the revenue increase will be greater. Cost and other data relating to the two proposals are as follows:
Competing P2 Investments Ron Booth, the CEO for Sunders Manufacturing, was wondering which of two pollution control systems he should choose. The firm's current production process produces a gaseous and a liquid residue. A recent state law mandated that emissions of these residues be reduced to levels considerably below current performance. Failure to reduce the emissions would invoke stiff fines and possible closure of the operating plant. Fortunately, the new law provided a transition period, and Ron had used the time wisely. His engineers had developed two separate proposals. The first proposal involved the acquisition of scrubbers for gaseous emissions and a treatment facility to remove the liquid residues. The second proposal was more radical. It entailed the redesign of the manufacturing process and the acquisition of new production equipment to support this new design. The new process would solve the environmental problem by avoiding the production of residues. Although the equipment for each proposal normally would qualify as seven-year property, the state managed to obtain an agreement with the federal government to allow any pollution abatement equipment to qualify as five-year property. State tax law follows federal guidelines. Both proposals qualify for the five-year property benefit. Ron's vice president of marketing has projected an increase in revenues because of favorable environmental performance publicity. This increase is the result of selling more of Sunders's products to environmentally conscious customers. However, because the second approach is greener, the vice president believes that the revenue increase will be greater. Cost and other data relating to the two proposals are as follows:   The expected life for each investment's equipment is six years. The expected salvage value is $2,000,000 for scrubbers and treatment equipment and $3,000,000 for process redesign equipment. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent. The cost of capital is 10 percent. Required: 1. Compute the NPV of each proposal and make a recommendation to Ron Booth. 2. The environmental manager observes that the scrubbers and treatment facility enable the company to just meet state emission standards. She feels that the standards will likely increase within three years. If so, this would entail a modification at the end of three years costing an additional $8,000,000. Also, she is concerned that continued liquid residue releases-even those meeting state standards-could push a local lake into a hazardous state by the end of three years. If so, this could prompt political action requiring the company to clean up the lake. Cleanup costs would range between $40,000,000 and $60,000,000. Analyze and discuss the effect this new information has on the two alternatives. If you have read the chapter on environmental cost management, describe how the concept of ecoefficiency applies to this setting.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
The expected life for each investment's equipment is six years. The expected salvage value is $2,000,000 for scrubbers and treatment equipment and $3,000,000 for process redesign equipment. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent. The cost of capital is 10 percent.
Required:
1. Compute the NPV of each proposal and make a recommendation to Ron Booth.
2. The environmental manager observes that the scrubbers and treatment facility enable the company to just meet state emission standards. She feels that the standards will likely increase within three years. If so, this would entail a modification at the end of three years costing an additional $8,000,000. Also, she is concerned that continued liquid residue releases-even those meeting state standards-could push a local lake into a hazardous state by the end of three years. If so, this could prompt political action requiring the company to clean up the lake. Cleanup costs would range between $40,000,000 and $60,000,000. Analyze and discuss the effect this new information has on the two alternatives. If you have read the chapter on environmental cost management, describe how the concept of ecoefficiency applies to this setting.
Question
NET PRESENT VALUE
Jan Booth, controller of Golding Company, just received the following data associated with production of a new product:
• Expected annual revenues, $300,000
• A projected product life cycle of five years
• Equipment, $320,000 with a salvage value of $40,000 after five years
• Expected increase in working capital, $40,000 (recoverable at the end of five years)
• Annual cash operating expenses are estimated at $180,000.
• The required rate of return is 8 percent.
Required:
1. Estimate the annual cash flows for the new product.
2. Using the estimated annual cash flows, calculate the NPV.
3. What if revenues were overestimated by $60,000? Redo the NPV analysis, correcting for this error. Assume the operating expenses remain the same.
Question
What are the principal tax implications that should be considered in Year 0?
Question
Payback, NPV, Managerial Incentives, Ethical Behavior
Kent Tessman, manager of a Dairy Products Division, was pleased with his division's performance over the past three years. Each year, divisional profits had increased, and he had earned a sizable bonus. (Bonuses are a linear function of the division's reported income.) He had also received considerable attention from higher management. A vice president had told him in confidence that if his performance over the next three years matched his first three, he would be promoted to higher management.
Determined to fulfill these expectations, Kent made sure that he personally reviewed every capital budget request. He wanted to be certain that any funds invested would provide good, solid returns. (The division's cost of capital is 10 percent.) At the moment, he is reviewing two independent requests. Proposal A involves automating a manufacturing operation that is currently labor intensive. Proposal B centers on developing and marketing a new ice cream product. Proposal A requires an initial outlay of $250,000, and Proposal B requires $312,500. Both projects could be funded, given the status of the division's capital budget. Both have an expected life of six years and have the following projected after-tax cash flows:
Payback, NPV, Managerial Incentives, Ethical Behavior Kent Tessman, manager of a Dairy Products Division, was pleased with his division's performance over the past three years. Each year, divisional profits had increased, and he had earned a sizable bonus. (Bonuses are a linear function of the division's reported income.) He had also received considerable attention from higher management. A vice president had told him in confidence that if his performance over the next three years matched his first three, he would be promoted to higher management. Determined to fulfill these expectations, Kent made sure that he personally reviewed every capital budget request. He wanted to be certain that any funds invested would provide good, solid returns. (The division's cost of capital is 10 percent.) At the moment, he is reviewing two independent requests. Proposal A involves automating a manufacturing operation that is currently labor intensive. Proposal B centers on developing and marketing a new ice cream product. Proposal A requires an initial outlay of $250,000, and Proposal B requires $312,500. Both projects could be funded, given the status of the division's capital budget. Both have an expected life of six years and have the following projected after-tax cash flows:   After careful consideration of each investment, Kent approved funding of Proposal A and rejected Proposal B. Required: 1. Compute the NPV for each proposal. 2. Compute the payback period for each proposal. 3. According to your analysis, which proposal(s) should be accepted? Explain. 4. Explain why Kent accepted only Proposal A. Considering the possible reasons for rejection, would you judge his behavior to be ethical? Explain.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
After careful consideration of each investment, Kent approved funding of Proposal A and rejected Proposal B.
Required:
1. Compute the NPV for each proposal.
2. Compute the payback period for each proposal.
3. According to your analysis, which proposal(s) should be accepted? Explain.
4. Explain why Kent accepted only Proposal A. Considering the possible reasons for rejection, would you judge his behavior to be ethical? Explain.
Question
The time value of money is ignored by the payback period and the accounting rate of return. Explain why this is a major deficiency in these two models.
Question
NPV
A hospital is considering the possibility of two new purchases: new MRI equipment and new biopsy equipment. Each project requires an investment of $850,000. The expected life for each is five years with no expected salvage value. The net cash inflows associated with the two independent projects are as follows:
NPV A hospital is considering the possibility of two new purchases: new MRI equipment and new biopsy equipment. Each project requires an investment of $850,000. The expected life for each is five years with no expected salvage value. The net cash inflows associated with the two independent projects are as follows:   Required: Compute the net present value of each project, assuming a required rate of 12 percent.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Required: Compute the net present value of each project, assuming a required rate of 12 percent.
Question
BASIC IRR ANALYSIS
Ireland Company is considering installing a new IT system. The cost of the new system is estimated to be $750,000, but it would produce after-tax savings of $150,000 per year in labor costs. The estimated life of the new system is 10 years, with no salvage value expected. Intrigued by the possibility of saving $150,000 per year and having a more reliable information system, the president of Ireland has asked for an analysis of the project's economic viability. All capital projects are required to earn at least the firm's cost of capital, which is 12 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the project's internal rate of return. Should the company acquire the new IT system?
2. Suppose that savings are less than claimed. Calculate the minimum annual cash savings that must be realized for the project to earn a rate equal to the firm's cost of capital. Comment on the safety margin that exists, if any.
3. Suppose that the life of the IT system is overestimated by two years. Repeat Requirements 1 and 2 under this assumption. Comment on the usefulness of this information.
Question
Internal Rate of Return
Manzer Enterprises is considering two independent investments:
A new automated materials handling system that costs $900,000 and will produce net cash inflows of $300,000 at the end of each year for the next four years.
A computer-aided manufacturing system that costs $775,000 and will produce labor savings of $400,000 and $500,000 at the end of the first year and second year, respectively.
Manzer has a cost of capital of 8 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the IRR for the first investment and determine if it is acceptable or not.
2. Calculate the IRR of the second investment and comment on its acceptability. Use 12 percent as the first guess.
3. What if the cash flows for the first investment are $250,000 instead of $300,000?
Question
Explain why the MACRS method of recognizing depreciation is better than the straight-line method.
Question
Replacement Decision, Computing After-Tax Cash Flows, Basic NPV Analysis
Okmulgee Hospital (a large metropolitan for-profit hospital) is considering replacing its MRI equipment with a new model manufactured by a different company. The old MRI equipment was acquired three years ago, has a remaining life of five years, and will have a salvage value of $100,000. The book value is $2,000,000. Straight-line depreciation with a half-year convention is being used for tax purposes. The cash operating costs of the existing MRI equipment total $1,000,000 per year.
The new MRI equipment has an initial cost of $5,000,000 and will have cash operating costs of $500,000 per year. The new MRI will have a life of five years and a salvage value of $1,000,000 at the end of the fifth year. MACRS depreciation will be used for tax purposes. If the new MRI equipment is purchased, the old one will be sold for $500,000. The company needs to decide whether to keep the old MRI equipment or buy the new one. The cost of capital is 12 percent. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent.
Required:
Compute the NPV of each alternative. Should the company keep the old MRI equipment or buy the new one?
Question
What is the payback period? Name and discuss three possible reasons that the payback period is used to help make capital investment decisions.
Question
PAYBACK, ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN
Refer to Exercise 19-11.
1. Compute the payback period for each project. Assume that the manager of the hospital accepts only projects with a payback period of three years or less. Offer some reasons why this may be a rational strategy even though the NPV computed in Exercise 19-11 may indicate otherwise.
2. Compute the accounting rate of return for each project.
Question
Capital Investment, Discount Rates, Intangible and Indirect Benefits, Time Horizon, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment
Mallette Manufacturing, Inc., produces washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers. Because of increasing competition, Mallette is considering investing in an automated manufacturing system. Since competition is most keen for dishwashers, the production process for this line has been selected for initial evaluation. The automated system for the dishwasher line would replace an existing system (purchased one year ago for $6 million). Although the existing system will be fully depreciated in nine years, it is expected to last another 10 years. The automated system would also have a useful life of 10 years.
Capital Investment, Discount Rates, Intangible and Indirect Benefits, Time Horizon, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Mallette Manufacturing, Inc., produces washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers. Because of increasing competition, Mallette is considering investing in an automated manufacturing system. Since competition is most keen for dishwashers, the production process for this line has been selected for initial evaluation. The automated system for the dishwasher line would replace an existing system (purchased one year ago for $6 million). Although the existing system will be fully depreciated in nine years, it is expected to last another 10 years. The automated system would also have a useful life of 10 years.   The automated system will cost $34 million to purchase, plus an estimated $20 million in software and implementation. (Assume that all investment outlays occur at the beginning of the first year.) If the automated equipment is purchased, the old equipment can be sold for $3 million. The automated system will require fewer parts for production and will produce with less waste. Because of this, the direct material cost per unit will be reduced by 25 percent. Automation will also require fewer support activities, and as a consequence, volume-related overhead will be reduced by $4 per unit and direct fixed overhead (other than depreciation) by $17 per unit. Direct labor is reduced by 60 percent. Assume, for simplicity, that the new investment will be depreciated on a pure straight-line basis for tax purposes with no salvage value. Ignore the half-life convention. The firm's cost of capital is 12 percent, but management chooses to use 20 percent as the required rate of return for evaluation of investments. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent. Required: 1. Compute the net present value for the old system and the automated system. Which system would the company choose? 2. Repeat the net present value analysis of Requirement 1, using 12 percent as the discount rate. 3. Upon seeing the projected sales for the old system, the marketing manager commented: Sales of 100,000 units per year cannot be maintained in the current competitive environment for more than one year unless we buy the automated system. The automated system will allow us to compete on the basis of quality and lead time. If we keep the old system, our sales will drop by 10,000 units per year. Repeat the net present value analysis, using this new information and a 12 percent discount rate. 4. An industrial engineer for Mallette noticed that salvage value for the automated equipment had not been included in the analysis. He estimated that the equipment could be sold for $4 million at the end of 10 years. He also estimated that the equipment of the old system would have no salvage value at the end of 10 years. Repeat the net present value analysis using this information, the information in Requirement 3, and a 12 percent discount rate. 5. Given the outcomes of the previous four requirements, comment on the importance of providing accurate inputs for assessing investments in automated manufacturing systems.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
The automated system will cost $34 million to purchase, plus an estimated $20 million in software and implementation. (Assume that all investment outlays occur at the beginning of the first year.) If the automated equipment is purchased, the old equipment can be sold for $3 million.
The automated system will require fewer parts for production and will produce with less waste. Because of this, the direct material cost per unit will be reduced by 25 percent. Automation will also require fewer support activities, and as a consequence, volume-related overhead will be reduced by $4 per unit and direct fixed overhead (other than depreciation) by $17 per unit. Direct labor is reduced by 60 percent. Assume, for simplicity, that the new investment will be depreciated on a pure straight-line basis for tax purposes with no salvage value. Ignore the half-life convention.
The firm's cost of capital is 12 percent, but management chooses to use 20 percent as the required rate of return for evaluation of investments. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent.
Required:
1. Compute the net present value for the old system and the automated system. Which system would the company choose?
2. Repeat the net present value analysis of Requirement 1, using 12 percent as the discount rate.
3. Upon seeing the projected sales for the old system, the marketing manager commented: "Sales of 100,000 units per year cannot be maintained in the current competitive environment for more than one year unless we buy the automated system. The automated system will allow us to compete on the basis of quality and lead time. If we keep the old system, our sales will drop by 10,000 units per year." Repeat the net present value analysis, using this new information and a 12 percent discount rate.
4. An industrial engineer for Mallette noticed that salvage value for the automated equipment had not been included in the analysis. He estimated that the equipment could be sold for $4 million at the end of 10 years. He also estimated that the equipment of the old system would have no salvage value at the end of 10 years. Repeat the net present value analysis using this information, the information in Requirement 3, and a 12 percent discount rate.
5. Given the outcomes of the previous four requirements, comment on the importance of providing accurate inputs for assessing investments in automated manufacturing systems.
Question
NPV Versus Internal Rate of Return
Keating Hospital is considering two different low-field MRI systems: the Clearlook System and the Goodview System. The projected annual revenues, annual costs, capital outlays, and project life for each system (in after-tax cash flows) are as follows:
NPV Versus Internal Rate of Return Keating Hospital is considering two different low-field MRI systems: the Clearlook System and the Goodview System. The projected annual revenues, annual costs, capital outlays, and project life for each system (in after-tax cash flows) are as follows:   Assume that the cost of capital for the company is 8 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the NPV for the Clearlook System. 2. Calculate the NPV for the Goodview System. Which MRI system would be chosen? 3. What if Keating Hospital wants to know why IRR is not being used for the investment analysis? Calculate the IRR for each project and explain why it is not suitable for choosing among mutually exclusive investments.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Assume that the cost of capital for the company is 8 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the NPV for the Clearlook System.
2. Calculate the NPV for the Goodview System. Which MRI system would be chosen?
3. What if Keating Hospital wants to know why IRR is not being used for the investment analysis? Calculate the IRR for each project and explain why it is not suitable for choosing among mutually exclusive investments.
Question
Explain the important factors to consider for capital investment decisions relating to advanced technology and P2 opportunities.
Question
NPV, MAKE OR BUY, MACRS, BASIC ANALYSIS
Jonfran Company manufactures three different models of paper shredders including the waste container, which serves as the base. While the shredder heads are different for all three models, the waste container is the same. The number of waste containers that Jonfran will need during the next five years is estimated as follows:
NPV, MAKE OR BUY, MACRS, BASIC ANALYSIS Jonfran Company manufactures three different models of paper shredders including the waste container, which serves as the base. While the shredder heads are different for all three models, the waste container is the same. The number of waste containers that Jonfran will need during the next five years is estimated as follows:   The equipment used to manufacture the waste container must be replaced because it is broken and cannot be repaired. The new equipment would have a purchase price of $945,000 with terms of 2/10, n/30; the company's policy is to take all purchase discounts. The freight on the equipment would be $11,000, and installation costs would total $22,900. The equipment would be purchased in December 2010 and placed into service on January 1, 2011. It would have a five-year economic life and would be treated as three-year property under MACRS. This equipment is expected to have a salvage value of $12,000 at the end of its economic life in 2015. The new equipment would be more efficient than the old equipment, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in both direct materials and variable overhead. The savings in direct materials would result in an additional one-time decrease in working capital requirements of $2,500, resulting from a reduction in direct material inventories. This working capital reduction would be recognized at the time of equipment acquisition. The old equipment is fully depreciated and is not included in the fixed overhead. The old equipment from the plant can be sold for a salvage amount of $1,500. Rather than replace the equipment, one of Jonfran's production managers has suggested that the waste containers be purchased. One supplier has quoted a price of $27 per container. This price is $8 less than Jonfran's current manufacturing cost, which is as follows:   Jonfran uses a plantwide fixed overhead rate in its operations. If the waste containers are purchased outside, the salary and benefits of one supervisor, included in fixed overhead at $45,000, would be eliminated. There would be no other changes in the other cash and noncash items included in fixed overhead except depreciation on the new equipment. Jonfran is subject to a 40 percent tax rate. Management assumes that all cash flows occur at the end of the year and uses a 12 percent after-tax discount rate. Required: 1. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the make alternative. Calculate the NPV of the make alternative. 2. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the buy alternative. Calculate the NPV of the buy alternative. 3. Which should Jonfran do-make or buy the containers? What qualitative factors should be considered? (CMA adapted)<div style=padding-top: 35px>
The equipment used to manufacture the waste container must be replaced because it is broken and cannot be repaired. The new equipment would have a purchase price of $945,000 with terms of 2/10, n/30; the company's policy is to take all purchase discounts. The freight on the equipment would be $11,000, and installation costs would total $22,900. The equipment would be purchased in December 2010 and placed into service on January 1, 2011. It would have a five-year economic life and would be treated as three-year property under MACRS. This equipment is expected to have a salvage value of $12,000 at the end of its economic life in 2015. The new equipment would be more efficient than the old equipment, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in both direct materials and variable overhead. The savings in direct materials would result in an additional one-time decrease in working capital requirements of $2,500, resulting from a reduction in direct material inventories. This working capital reduction would be recognized at the time of equipment acquisition.
The old equipment is fully depreciated and is not included in the fixed overhead. The old equipment from the plant can be sold for a salvage amount of $1,500. Rather than replace the equipment, one of Jonfran's production managers has suggested that the waste containers be purchased. One supplier has quoted a price of $27 per container. This price is $8 less than Jonfran's current manufacturing cost, which is as follows:
NPV, MAKE OR BUY, MACRS, BASIC ANALYSIS Jonfran Company manufactures three different models of paper shredders including the waste container, which serves as the base. While the shredder heads are different for all three models, the waste container is the same. The number of waste containers that Jonfran will need during the next five years is estimated as follows:   The equipment used to manufacture the waste container must be replaced because it is broken and cannot be repaired. The new equipment would have a purchase price of $945,000 with terms of 2/10, n/30; the company's policy is to take all purchase discounts. The freight on the equipment would be $11,000, and installation costs would total $22,900. The equipment would be purchased in December 2010 and placed into service on January 1, 2011. It would have a five-year economic life and would be treated as three-year property under MACRS. This equipment is expected to have a salvage value of $12,000 at the end of its economic life in 2015. The new equipment would be more efficient than the old equipment, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in both direct materials and variable overhead. The savings in direct materials would result in an additional one-time decrease in working capital requirements of $2,500, resulting from a reduction in direct material inventories. This working capital reduction would be recognized at the time of equipment acquisition. The old equipment is fully depreciated and is not included in the fixed overhead. The old equipment from the plant can be sold for a salvage amount of $1,500. Rather than replace the equipment, one of Jonfran's production managers has suggested that the waste containers be purchased. One supplier has quoted a price of $27 per container. This price is $8 less than Jonfran's current manufacturing cost, which is as follows:   Jonfran uses a plantwide fixed overhead rate in its operations. If the waste containers are purchased outside, the salary and benefits of one supervisor, included in fixed overhead at $45,000, would be eliminated. There would be no other changes in the other cash and noncash items included in fixed overhead except depreciation on the new equipment. Jonfran is subject to a 40 percent tax rate. Management assumes that all cash flows occur at the end of the year and uses a 12 percent after-tax discount rate. Required: 1. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the make alternative. Calculate the NPV of the make alternative. 2. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the buy alternative. Calculate the NPV of the buy alternative. 3. Which should Jonfran do-make or buy the containers? What qualitative factors should be considered? (CMA adapted)<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Jonfran uses a plantwide fixed overhead rate in its operations. If the waste containers are purchased outside, the salary and benefits of one supervisor, included in fixed overhead at $45,000, would be eliminated. There would be no other changes in the other cash and noncash items included in fixed overhead except depreciation on the new equipment.
Jonfran is subject to a 40 percent tax rate. Management assumes that all cash flows occur at the end of the year and uses a 12 percent after-tax discount rate.
Required:
1. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the make alternative. Calculate the NPV of the make alternative.
2. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the buy alternative. Calculate the NPV of the buy alternative.
3. Which should Jonfran do-make or buy the containers? What qualitative factors should be considered? (CMA adapted)
Question
What is the accounting rate of return?
Question
NPV: BASIC CONCEPTS
Mirar Vision Clinic is considering an investment that requires an outlay of $400,000 and promises a net cash inflow one year from now of $540,000. Assume the cost of capital is 10 percent.
Required:
1. Break the $450,000 future cash inflow into three components:
a. The return of the original investment
b. The cost of capital
c. The profit earned on the investment
2. Now, compute the present value of the profit earned on the investment.
3. Compute the NPV of the investment. Compare this with the present value of the profit computed in Requirement 2. What does this tell you about the meaning of NPV?
Question
Capital budgeting for environmental projects offers an interesting area for additional study. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has partnered with Tellus Institute ( www.tellus.org ) to further its ongoing interest in environmental cost management. Much of the the information relating to the U.S. EPA environmental accounting project can be found in the archives at the EPA webite ( www.epa.gov ). The EPA environmental accounting project dealt with such topics as environmental cost definitions, decisions using environmental costs, and capital budgeting. Using the EPA and Tellus websites as well as the World Resources Institute ( www.wri.org ) and other resources that you can locate, answer the following questions.
Required:
1. What evidence exists that firms use the payback period for screening and evaluating environmental projects? If payback is used, can you find the most common hurdle rate that firms use to justify environmental projects?
2. Are NPV and IRR used for environmental project approval? Can you find out what the hurdle rate is for IRR? Do you think this hurdle rate is the cost of capital? If not, then discuss why a different required rate is used.
3. Do you think the approval thresholds for environmental projects tend to be higher, lower, or the same when compared to nonenvironmental projects? See if you can find any evidence to support your viewpoint. Why might the approval thresholds differ from those of nonen- vironmental projects?
4. See if you can find a discussion on how capital budgeting for environmental projects may differ from that for conventional projects. List these differences.
Capital budgeting for environmental projects offers an interesting area for additional study. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has partnered with Tellus Institute ( www.tellus.org ) to further its ongoing interest in environmental cost management. Much of the the information relating to the U.S. EPA environmental accounting project can be found in the archives at the EPA webite ( www.epa.gov ). The EPA environmental accounting project dealt with such topics as environmental cost definitions, decisions using environmental costs, and capital budgeting. Using the EPA and Tellus websites as well as the World Resources Institute ( www.wri.org ) and other resources that you can locate, answer the following questions. Required: 1. What evidence exists that firms use the payback period for screening and evaluating environmental projects? If payback is used, can you find the most common hurdle rate that firms use to justify environmental projects? 2. Are NPV and IRR used for environmental project approval? Can you find out what the hurdle rate is for IRR? Do you think this hurdle rate is the cost of capital? If not, then discuss why a different required rate is used. 3. Do you think the approval thresholds for environmental projects tend to be higher, lower, or the same when compared to nonenvironmental projects? See if you can find any evidence to support your viewpoint. Why might the approval thresholds differ from those of nonen- vironmental projects? 4. See if you can find a discussion on how capital budgeting for environmental projects may differ from that for conventional projects. List these differences.  <div style=padding-top: 35px>
Question
After-Tax Cash Flows
Warren Company plans to open a new repair service center for one of its electronic products. The center requires an investment in depreciable assets costing $480,000. The assets will be depreciated on a straight-line basis, over four years, and have no expected salvage value. The annual income statement for the center is given below.
After-Tax Cash Flows Warren Company plans to open a new repair service center for one of its electronic products. The center requires an investment in depreciable assets costing $480,000. The assets will be depreciated on a straight-line basis, over four years, and have no expected salvage value. The annual income statement for the center is given below.   Required: 1. Using the income approach, calculate the after-tax cash flows. 2. Using the decomposition approach, calculate the after-tax cash flows for each item of the income statement and show that the total is the same as the income approach. 3. What if it is desirable to express the decomposition approach in a spreadsheet format for the four years to facilitate the use of spreadsheet software packages? Express the decomposition approach in a spreadsheet format, with a column for each income item and a total column.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
Required:
1. Using the income approach, calculate the after-tax cash flows.
2. Using the decomposition approach, calculate the after-tax cash flows for each item of the income statement and show that the total is the same as the income approach.
3. What if it is desirable to express the decomposition approach in a spreadsheet format for the four years to facilitate the use of spreadsheet software packages? Express the decomposition approach in a spreadsheet format, with a column for each income item and a total column.
Question
Explain what a postaudit is and how it can provide useful input for future capital investment decisions-especially those involving advanced technology.
Question
What is the cost of capital? What role does it play in capital investment decisions?
Question
Solving for Unknowns
Consider each of the following independent cases.
Required:
1. Hal's Stunt Company is investing $120,000 in a project that will yield a uniform series of cash inflows over the next four years. If the internal rate of return is 14 percent, how much cash inflow per year can be expected?
2. Warner Medical Clinic has decided to invest in some new blood diagnostic equipment. The equipment will have a three-year life and will produce a uniform series of cash savings. The net present value of the equipment is $1,750, using a discount rate of 8 percent. The internal rate of return is 12 percent. Determine the investment and the amount of cash savings realized each year.
3. A new lathe costing $60,096 will produce savings of $12,000 per year. How many years must the lathe last if an IRR of 18 percent is realized?
4. The NPV of a new product (a new brand of candy) is $6,075. The product has a life of four years and produces the following cash flows:
Solving for Unknowns Consider each of the following independent cases. Required: 1. Hal's Stunt Company is investing $120,000 in a project that will yield a uniform series of cash inflows over the next four years. If the internal rate of return is 14 percent, how much cash inflow per year can be expected? 2. Warner Medical Clinic has decided to invest in some new blood diagnostic equipment. The equipment will have a three-year life and will produce a uniform series of cash savings. The net present value of the equipment is $1,750, using a discount rate of 8 percent. The internal rate of return is 12 percent. Determine the investment and the amount of cash savings realized each year. 3. A new lathe costing $60,096 will produce savings of $12,000 per year. How many years must the lathe last if an IRR of 18 percent is realized? 4. The NPV of a new product (a new brand of candy) is $6,075. The product has a life of four years and produces the following cash flows:   The cost of the project is three times the cash flow produced in Year 4. The discount rate is 10 percent. Find the cost of the project and the cash flow for Year 4.<div style=padding-top: 35px>
The cost of the project is three times the cash flow produced in Year 4. The discount rate is 10 percent. Find the cost of the project and the cash flow for Year 4.
Question
The IRR is the true or actual rate of return being earned by the project. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss.
Question
Explain what sensitivity analysis is. How can it help in capital budgeting decisions?
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/42
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 19: Capital Investment
1
PAYBACK AND ARR
Each of the following scenarios is independent. All cash flows are after-tax cash flows.
Required:
1. Jim Larsen has purchased a tractor for $125,000. He expects to receive a net cash flow of $31,250 per year from the investment. What is the payback period for Jim?
2. Sam Rutter invested $240,000 in a laundromat. The facility has a 10-year life expectancy with no expected salvage value. The laundromat will produce a net cash flow of $72,000 per year. What is the accounting rate of return?
3. Patricia Piel has purchased a business building for $280,000. She expects to receive the following cash flows over a 10-year period: Year 1: $35,000 Year 2: $49,000 Years 3-10: $70,000 What is the payback period for Patricia? What is the accounting rate of return?
1.
Calculate Payback period:
1. Calculate Payback period:   2. Calculate Accounting rate of return:   3. Calculate Payback period:   Therefore payback period is 4.8 years. Calculate Accounting rate of return: Average net income:   Accounting rate of return:  2.
Calculate Accounting rate of return:
1. Calculate Payback period:   2. Calculate Accounting rate of return:   3. Calculate Payback period:   Therefore payback period is 4.8 years. Calculate Accounting rate of return: Average net income:   Accounting rate of return:  3.
Calculate Payback period:
1. Calculate Payback period:   2. Calculate Accounting rate of return:   3. Calculate Payback period:   Therefore payback period is 4.8 years. Calculate Accounting rate of return: Average net income:   Accounting rate of return:  Therefore payback period is 4.8 years.
Calculate Accounting rate of return:
Average net income:
1. Calculate Payback period:   2. Calculate Accounting rate of return:   3. Calculate Payback period:   Therefore payback period is 4.8 years. Calculate Accounting rate of return: Average net income:   Accounting rate of return:  Accounting rate of return:
1. Calculate Payback period:   2. Calculate Accounting rate of return:   3. Calculate Payback period:   Therefore payback period is 4.8 years. Calculate Accounting rate of return: Average net income:   Accounting rate of return:
2
Advanced Technology, Payback, NPV, IRR, Sensitivity Analysis
Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows:
Advanced Technology, Payback, NPV, IRR, Sensitivity Analysis Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows:   The system will cost $9,000,000 and last 10 years. The company's cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchased-even if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of $1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of $300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the company's decision?
The system will cost $9,000,000 and last 10 years. The company's cost of capital is 12 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired?
2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchased-even if it does not meet the payback criterion?
3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of $1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of $300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the company's decision?
1.
Calculate Payback period:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. Note:
Calculate Annual cash flow:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired.
2.
Calculate NPV of the project:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. Calculate IRR of the project:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. .
Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12.
Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital.
3.
Calculate Payback period under revised system:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. Note:
Calculate revised annual cash inflows:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years.
Calculate NPV:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. Calculate IRR:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. .
Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12.
Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital.
Calculate NPV:
In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:
1. Calculate Payback period:   Note: Calculate Annual cash flow:   The given project does not meet the company's policy to accept projects only with a payback of five years or less. Hence, the system shall not be acquired. 2. Calculate NPV of the project:   Calculate IRR of the project:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 10 and 12 percent which means IRR 0.12. Still the system should not be purchased as NPV is negative and IRR is less than the cost of capital. 3. Calculate Payback period under revised system:   Note: Calculate revised annual cash inflows:   Payback period given the revised annual cash inflow is 5 years. Calculate NPV:   Calculate IRR:   . Using Exhibit 19B-2, this discount factor now lies between 14 and 16 percent which means IRR 0.12. Given the revised cash flows, the purchase of system becomes financially viable as NPV is plosive and IRR is IRR is more than the cost of capital. Calculate NPV: In case salvage value is halved, NPV is computed as under:   In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased. In this case NPV is still positive and system should be purchased.
3
Explain how the NPV is used to determine whether a project should be accepted or rejected.
NPV measures the profitability of an investment. A positive NPV indicates that the investment increases the firm's wealth. Hence, the NPV measures the increase in firm value from a project.
After the NPV is calculated, it can be used to determine whether the project should be accepted or rejected.
If the NPV is greater than zero then the investment is profitable and therefore, acceptable. A positive NPV signifies that the initial investment has been recovered, the required rate of return has been recovered and a return in excess of the initial investment and the required rate of return has been received.
If the NPV equals zero, the decision maker will find acceptance or rejection of the investment equal.
If the NPV is less than zero, the investment should be rejected. In this case it is earning less than the required rate of return.
4
NPV Versus IRR
Covington Pharmacies has decided to automate its insurance claims process. Two networked computer systems are being considered. The systems have an expected life of two years. The net cash flows associated with the systems are as follows. The cash benefits represent the savings created by switching from a manual to an automated system.
NPV Versus IRR Covington Pharmacies has decided to automate its insurance claims process. Two networked computer systems are being considered. The systems have an expected life of two years. The net cash flows associated with the systems are as follows. The cash benefits represent the savings created by switching from a manual to an automated system.   The company's cost of capital is 10 percent. Required: 1. Compute the NPV and the IRR for each investment. 2. Show that the project with the larger NPV is the correct choice for the company.
The company's cost of capital is 10 percent.
Required:
1. Compute the NPV and the IRR for each investment.
2. Show that the project with the larger NPV is the correct choice for the company.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
(Appendix A) Future Value, Present Value
The following cases are each independent of the others.
Required:
1. Sam Lilliam places $5,000 in a savings account that pays 3 percent. Suppose Sam leaves the original deposit plus any interest in the account for two years. How much will Sam have in savings after two years?
2. Suppose that the parents of a 12-year-old son want to have $80,000 in a fund six years from now to provide support for his college education. How much must they invest now to have the desired amount if the investment can earn 4 percent? 6 percent? 8 percent?
3. Killian Manufacturing is asking $500,000 for automated equipment, which is expected to last six years and will generate equal annual net cash inflows (because of reductions in labor costs, material waste, and so on). What is the minimum cash inflow that must be realized each year to justify the acquisition? The cost of capital is 8 percent.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Computation of After-Tax Cash Flows
Postman Company is considering two independent projects. One project involves a new product line, and the other involves the acquisition of forklifts for the Materials Handling Department. The projected annual operating revenues and expenses are as follows:
Computation of After-Tax Cash Flows Postman Company is considering two independent projects. One project involves a new product line, and the other involves the acquisition of forklifts for the Materials Handling Department. The projected annual operating revenues and expenses are as follows:     Required: Compute the after-tax cash flows of each project. The tax rate is 40 percent and includes federal and state assessments.
Computation of After-Tax Cash Flows Postman Company is considering two independent projects. One project involves a new product line, and the other involves the acquisition of forklifts for the Materials Handling Department. The projected annual operating revenues and expenses are as follows:     Required: Compute the after-tax cash flows of each project. The tax rate is 40 percent and includes federal and state assessments.
Required:
Compute the after-tax cash flows of each project. The tax rate is 40 percent and includes federal and state assessments.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
PAYBACK PERIOD
Lorie Christian is considering investing in either a storage facility or a car wash facility. Both projects have a five-year life and require an investment of $240,000. The cash flow patterns for each project are given below. Storage facility: Even cash flows of $80,000 per year. Car wash: $75,000, $95,000, $40,000, $80,000, and $60,000.
Required:
1. Calculate the payback period for the storage facility (even cash flows).
2. Calculate the payback period for the car wash facility (uneven cash flows). Which project should be accepted based on payback analysis? Explain.
3. What if a third mutually exclusive project, a laundry facility, became available with the same investment and annual cash flows of $100,000? Now which project would be chosen?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Explain why NPV is generally preferred over IRR when choosing among competing or mutually exclusive projects. Why would managers continue to use IRR to choose among mutually exclusive projects?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
MACRS, NPV
Lilly Company is planning to buy a set of special tools for its grinding operation. The cost of the tools is $18,000. The tools have a three-year life and qualify for the use of the three-year MACRS. The tax rate is 40 percent; the cost of capital is 12 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the present value of the tax depreciation shield, assuming that straight-line depreciation with a half-year life is used.
2. Calculate the present value of the tax depreciation shield, assuming that MACRS is used.
3. What is the benefit to the company of using MACRS?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
Explain the difference between independent projects and mutually exclusive projects.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
NPV AND IRR Each of the following scenarios is independent. All cash flows are after-tax cash flows.
Required:
1. Wetzel Corporation is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The cash benefits will be $600,000 per year. The system costs $3,600,000 and will last eight years. Compute the NPV assuming a discount rate of 10 percent. Should the company buy the new system?
2. Nephi Swasey has just invested $540,000 in a restaurant specializing in German food. He expects to receive $86,940 per year for the next eight years. His cost of capital is 5.5 percent. Compute the internal rate of return. Did Nephi make a good decision?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
POLLUTION PREVENTION, P2 INVESTMENT
Lewis Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Lewis uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly.
Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but it would also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality. The closed-loop system would produce only four pounds of sludge, and the sludge would be virtually pure metal, with significant market value. The system requires an investment of $420,000 and will cost $30,000 in increased annual operation plus an annual purchase of $5,000 of filtration medium. However, management projects the following savings:
POLLUTION PREVENTION, P2 INVESTMENT Lewis Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Lewis uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly. Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but it would also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality. The closed-loop system would produce only four pounds of sludge, and the sludge would be virtually pure metal, with significant market value. The system requires an investment of $420,000 and will cost $30,000 in increased annual operation plus an annual purchase of $5,000 of filtration medium. However, management projects the following savings:   The equipment qualifies as a seven-year MACRS asset. Management has decided to use straight-line depreciation for tax purposes, using the required half-year convention. The tax rate is 40 percent. The projected life of the system is 10 years. The hurdle rate is 16 percent for all capital budgeting projects, although the company's cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Based on the financial data provided, prepare a schedule of expected cash flows. 2. What is the payback period? 3. Calculate the NPV of the closed-loop system. Should the company invest in the system? 4. The calculation in Requirement 3 ignored several factors that could affect the project's viability: savings from avoiding the annual fines, positive effect on sales due to favorable environmental publicity, increased plating quality from the new system, and the avoidance of the lawsuit. Can these factors be quantified? If so, should they have been included in the analysis? Suppose, for example, that the annual fines being incurred are $50,000, the sales effect is $40,000 per year, the quality effect is not estimable, and that cancellation of the lawsuit because of the new system would avoid an expected settlement at the end of Year 3 (including legal fees) of $200,000. Assuming these are all after-tax amounts, what effect would their inclusion have on the payback period? On the NPV?
The equipment qualifies as a seven-year MACRS asset. Management has decided to use straight-line depreciation for tax purposes, using the required half-year convention. The tax rate is 40 percent. The projected life of the system is 10 years. The hurdle rate is 16 percent for all capital budgeting projects, although the company's cost of capital is 12 percent.
Required:
1. Based on the financial data provided, prepare a schedule of expected cash flows.
2. What is the payback period?
3. Calculate the NPV of the closed-loop system. Should the company invest in the system?
4. The calculation in Requirement 3 ignored several factors that could affect the project's viability: savings from avoiding the annual fines, positive effect on sales due to favorable environmental publicity, increased plating quality from the new system, and the avoidance of the lawsuit. Can these factors be quantified? If so, should they have been included in the analysis? Suppose, for example, that the annual fines being incurred are $50,000, the sales effect is $40,000 per year, the quality effect is not estimable, and that cancellation of the lawsuit because of the new system would avoid an expected settlement at the end of Year 3 (including legal fees) of $200,000. Assuming these are all after-tax amounts, what effect would their inclusion have on the payback period? On the NPV?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN
Ferguson Medical, Inc., is planning on investing in some new echocardiogram equipment that will require an initial outlay of $100,000. The system has an expected life of five years and no expected salvage value. The investment is expected to produce the following net cash flows over its life: $40,000, $40,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $60,000.
Required:
1. Calculate the annual net income for each of the five years.
2. Calculate the accounting rate of return.
3. What if a second competing revenue-producing investment has the same initial outlay and salvage value but the following cash flows (in chronological sequence): $60,000, $60,000, $60,000, $40,000, and $10,000? Using the accounting rate of return metric, which project should be selected: the first or the second? Which project is really the better of the two?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Why is it important to have accurate projections of cash flows for potential capital investments?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment
Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows:
Discount Rates, Quality, Market Share, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Sweeney Manufacturing has a plant where the equipment is essentially worn out. The equipment must be replaced, and Sweeney is considering two competing investment alternatives. The first alternative would replace the worn-out equipment with traditional production equipment; the second alternative uses contemporary technology and has computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities. The investment and after-tax operating cash flows for each alternative are as follows:   The company uses a discount rate of 18 percent for all of its investments. The company's cost of capital is 14 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the net present value for each investment using a discount rate of 18 percent. 2. Calculate the net present value for each investment using a discount rate of 14 percent. 3. Which rate should the company use to compute the net present value? Explain. 4. Now, assume that if the traditional equipment is purchased, the competitive position of the firm will deteriorate because of lower quality (relative to competitors who did automate). Marketing estimates that the loss in market share will decrease the projected net cash inflows by 50 percent for Years 3-10. Recalculate the NPV of the traditional equipment given this outcome. What is the decision now? Discuss the importance of assessing the effect of intangible and indirect benefits.
The company uses a discount rate of 18 percent for all of its investments. The company's cost of capital is 14 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the net present value for each investment using a discount rate of 18 percent.
2. Calculate the net present value for each investment using a discount rate of 14 percent.
3. Which rate should the company use to compute the net present value? Explain.
4. Now, assume that if the traditional equipment is purchased, the competitive position of the firm will deteriorate because of lower quality (relative to competitors who did automate). Marketing estimates that the loss in market share will decrease the projected net cash inflows by 50 percent for Years 3-10. Recalculate the NPV of the traditional equipment given this outcome. What is the decision now? Discuss the importance of assessing the effect of intangible and indirect benefits.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
Explain why the timing and quantity of cash flows are important in capital investment decisions.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
BASIC CONCEPTS
Roberts Company is considering an investment in equipment that is capable of producing more efficiently than the current technology. The outlay required is $1,638,000. The equipment is expected to last five years and will have no salvage value. The expected cash flows associated with the project are as follows:
BASIC CONCEPTS Roberts Company is considering an investment in equipment that is capable of producing more efficiently than the current technology. The outlay required is $1,638,000. The equipment is expected to last five years and will have no salvage value. The expected cash flows associated with the project are as follows:   Required: 1. Compute the project's payback period. 2. Compute the project's accounting rate of return. 3. Compute the project's net present value, assuming a required rate of return of 10 percent. 4. Compute the project's internal rate of return
Required:
1. Compute the project's payback period.
2. Compute the project's accounting rate of return.
3. Compute the project's net present value, assuming a required rate of return of 10 percent.
4. Compute the project's internal rate of return
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
Competing P2 Investments
Ron Booth, the CEO for Sunders Manufacturing, was wondering which of two pollution control systems he should choose. The firm's current production process produces a gaseous and a liquid residue. A recent state law mandated that emissions of these residues be reduced to levels considerably below current performance. Failure to reduce the emissions would invoke stiff fines and possible closure of the operating plant. Fortunately, the new law provided a transition period, and Ron had used the time wisely. His engineers had developed two separate proposals. The first proposal involved the acquisition of scrubbers for gaseous emissions and a treatment facility to remove the liquid residues. The second proposal was more radical. It entailed the redesign of the manufacturing process and the acquisition of new production equipment to support this new design. The new process would solve the environmental problem by avoiding the production of residues.
Although the equipment for each proposal normally would qualify as seven-year property, the state managed to obtain an agreement with the federal government to allow any pollution abatement equipment to qualify as five-year property. State tax law follows federal guidelines. Both proposals qualify for the five-year property benefit.
Ron's vice president of marketing has projected an increase in revenues because of favorable environmental performance publicity. This increase is the result of selling more of Sunders's products to environmentally conscious customers. However, because the second approach is "greener," the vice president believes that the revenue increase will be greater. Cost and other data relating to the two proposals are as follows:
Competing P2 Investments Ron Booth, the CEO for Sunders Manufacturing, was wondering which of two pollution control systems he should choose. The firm's current production process produces a gaseous and a liquid residue. A recent state law mandated that emissions of these residues be reduced to levels considerably below current performance. Failure to reduce the emissions would invoke stiff fines and possible closure of the operating plant. Fortunately, the new law provided a transition period, and Ron had used the time wisely. His engineers had developed two separate proposals. The first proposal involved the acquisition of scrubbers for gaseous emissions and a treatment facility to remove the liquid residues. The second proposal was more radical. It entailed the redesign of the manufacturing process and the acquisition of new production equipment to support this new design. The new process would solve the environmental problem by avoiding the production of residues. Although the equipment for each proposal normally would qualify as seven-year property, the state managed to obtain an agreement with the federal government to allow any pollution abatement equipment to qualify as five-year property. State tax law follows federal guidelines. Both proposals qualify for the five-year property benefit. Ron's vice president of marketing has projected an increase in revenues because of favorable environmental performance publicity. This increase is the result of selling more of Sunders's products to environmentally conscious customers. However, because the second approach is greener, the vice president believes that the revenue increase will be greater. Cost and other data relating to the two proposals are as follows:   The expected life for each investment's equipment is six years. The expected salvage value is $2,000,000 for scrubbers and treatment equipment and $3,000,000 for process redesign equipment. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent. The cost of capital is 10 percent. Required: 1. Compute the NPV of each proposal and make a recommendation to Ron Booth. 2. The environmental manager observes that the scrubbers and treatment facility enable the company to just meet state emission standards. She feels that the standards will likely increase within three years. If so, this would entail a modification at the end of three years costing an additional $8,000,000. Also, she is concerned that continued liquid residue releases-even those meeting state standards-could push a local lake into a hazardous state by the end of three years. If so, this could prompt political action requiring the company to clean up the lake. Cleanup costs would range between $40,000,000 and $60,000,000. Analyze and discuss the effect this new information has on the two alternatives. If you have read the chapter on environmental cost management, describe how the concept of ecoefficiency applies to this setting.
The expected life for each investment's equipment is six years. The expected salvage value is $2,000,000 for scrubbers and treatment equipment and $3,000,000 for process redesign equipment. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent. The cost of capital is 10 percent.
Required:
1. Compute the NPV of each proposal and make a recommendation to Ron Booth.
2. The environmental manager observes that the scrubbers and treatment facility enable the company to just meet state emission standards. She feels that the standards will likely increase within three years. If so, this would entail a modification at the end of three years costing an additional $8,000,000. Also, she is concerned that continued liquid residue releases-even those meeting state standards-could push a local lake into a hazardous state by the end of three years. If so, this could prompt political action requiring the company to clean up the lake. Cleanup costs would range between $40,000,000 and $60,000,000. Analyze and discuss the effect this new information has on the two alternatives. If you have read the chapter on environmental cost management, describe how the concept of ecoefficiency applies to this setting.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
NET PRESENT VALUE
Jan Booth, controller of Golding Company, just received the following data associated with production of a new product:
• Expected annual revenues, $300,000
• A projected product life cycle of five years
• Equipment, $320,000 with a salvage value of $40,000 after five years
• Expected increase in working capital, $40,000 (recoverable at the end of five years)
• Annual cash operating expenses are estimated at $180,000.
• The required rate of return is 8 percent.
Required:
1. Estimate the annual cash flows for the new product.
2. Using the estimated annual cash flows, calculate the NPV.
3. What if revenues were overestimated by $60,000? Redo the NPV analysis, correcting for this error. Assume the operating expenses remain the same.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
What are the principal tax implications that should be considered in Year 0?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
Payback, NPV, Managerial Incentives, Ethical Behavior
Kent Tessman, manager of a Dairy Products Division, was pleased with his division's performance over the past three years. Each year, divisional profits had increased, and he had earned a sizable bonus. (Bonuses are a linear function of the division's reported income.) He had also received considerable attention from higher management. A vice president had told him in confidence that if his performance over the next three years matched his first three, he would be promoted to higher management.
Determined to fulfill these expectations, Kent made sure that he personally reviewed every capital budget request. He wanted to be certain that any funds invested would provide good, solid returns. (The division's cost of capital is 10 percent.) At the moment, he is reviewing two independent requests. Proposal A involves automating a manufacturing operation that is currently labor intensive. Proposal B centers on developing and marketing a new ice cream product. Proposal A requires an initial outlay of $250,000, and Proposal B requires $312,500. Both projects could be funded, given the status of the division's capital budget. Both have an expected life of six years and have the following projected after-tax cash flows:
Payback, NPV, Managerial Incentives, Ethical Behavior Kent Tessman, manager of a Dairy Products Division, was pleased with his division's performance over the past three years. Each year, divisional profits had increased, and he had earned a sizable bonus. (Bonuses are a linear function of the division's reported income.) He had also received considerable attention from higher management. A vice president had told him in confidence that if his performance over the next three years matched his first three, he would be promoted to higher management. Determined to fulfill these expectations, Kent made sure that he personally reviewed every capital budget request. He wanted to be certain that any funds invested would provide good, solid returns. (The division's cost of capital is 10 percent.) At the moment, he is reviewing two independent requests. Proposal A involves automating a manufacturing operation that is currently labor intensive. Proposal B centers on developing and marketing a new ice cream product. Proposal A requires an initial outlay of $250,000, and Proposal B requires $312,500. Both projects could be funded, given the status of the division's capital budget. Both have an expected life of six years and have the following projected after-tax cash flows:   After careful consideration of each investment, Kent approved funding of Proposal A and rejected Proposal B. Required: 1. Compute the NPV for each proposal. 2. Compute the payback period for each proposal. 3. According to your analysis, which proposal(s) should be accepted? Explain. 4. Explain why Kent accepted only Proposal A. Considering the possible reasons for rejection, would you judge his behavior to be ethical? Explain.
After careful consideration of each investment, Kent approved funding of Proposal A and rejected Proposal B.
Required:
1. Compute the NPV for each proposal.
2. Compute the payback period for each proposal.
3. According to your analysis, which proposal(s) should be accepted? Explain.
4. Explain why Kent accepted only Proposal A. Considering the possible reasons for rejection, would you judge his behavior to be ethical? Explain.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
The time value of money is ignored by the payback period and the accounting rate of return. Explain why this is a major deficiency in these two models.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
NPV
A hospital is considering the possibility of two new purchases: new MRI equipment and new biopsy equipment. Each project requires an investment of $850,000. The expected life for each is five years with no expected salvage value. The net cash inflows associated with the two independent projects are as follows:
NPV A hospital is considering the possibility of two new purchases: new MRI equipment and new biopsy equipment. Each project requires an investment of $850,000. The expected life for each is five years with no expected salvage value. The net cash inflows associated with the two independent projects are as follows:   Required: Compute the net present value of each project, assuming a required rate of 12 percent.
Required: Compute the net present value of each project, assuming a required rate of 12 percent.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
BASIC IRR ANALYSIS
Ireland Company is considering installing a new IT system. The cost of the new system is estimated to be $750,000, but it would produce after-tax savings of $150,000 per year in labor costs. The estimated life of the new system is 10 years, with no salvage value expected. Intrigued by the possibility of saving $150,000 per year and having a more reliable information system, the president of Ireland has asked for an analysis of the project's economic viability. All capital projects are required to earn at least the firm's cost of capital, which is 12 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the project's internal rate of return. Should the company acquire the new IT system?
2. Suppose that savings are less than claimed. Calculate the minimum annual cash savings that must be realized for the project to earn a rate equal to the firm's cost of capital. Comment on the safety margin that exists, if any.
3. Suppose that the life of the IT system is overestimated by two years. Repeat Requirements 1 and 2 under this assumption. Comment on the usefulness of this information.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
Internal Rate of Return
Manzer Enterprises is considering two independent investments:
A new automated materials handling system that costs $900,000 and will produce net cash inflows of $300,000 at the end of each year for the next four years.
A computer-aided manufacturing system that costs $775,000 and will produce labor savings of $400,000 and $500,000 at the end of the first year and second year, respectively.
Manzer has a cost of capital of 8 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the IRR for the first investment and determine if it is acceptable or not.
2. Calculate the IRR of the second investment and comment on its acceptability. Use 12 percent as the first guess.
3. What if the cash flows for the first investment are $250,000 instead of $300,000?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
Explain why the MACRS method of recognizing depreciation is better than the straight-line method.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
Replacement Decision, Computing After-Tax Cash Flows, Basic NPV Analysis
Okmulgee Hospital (a large metropolitan for-profit hospital) is considering replacing its MRI equipment with a new model manufactured by a different company. The old MRI equipment was acquired three years ago, has a remaining life of five years, and will have a salvage value of $100,000. The book value is $2,000,000. Straight-line depreciation with a half-year convention is being used for tax purposes. The cash operating costs of the existing MRI equipment total $1,000,000 per year.
The new MRI equipment has an initial cost of $5,000,000 and will have cash operating costs of $500,000 per year. The new MRI will have a life of five years and a salvage value of $1,000,000 at the end of the fifth year. MACRS depreciation will be used for tax purposes. If the new MRI equipment is purchased, the old one will be sold for $500,000. The company needs to decide whether to keep the old MRI equipment or buy the new one. The cost of capital is 12 percent. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent.
Required:
Compute the NPV of each alternative. Should the company keep the old MRI equipment or buy the new one?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
What is the payback period? Name and discuss three possible reasons that the payback period is used to help make capital investment decisions.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
PAYBACK, ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN
Refer to Exercise 19-11.
1. Compute the payback period for each project. Assume that the manager of the hospital accepts only projects with a payback period of three years or less. Offer some reasons why this may be a rational strategy even though the NPV computed in Exercise 19-11 may indicate otherwise.
2. Compute the accounting rate of return for each project.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
Capital Investment, Discount Rates, Intangible and Indirect Benefits, Time Horizon, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment
Mallette Manufacturing, Inc., produces washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers. Because of increasing competition, Mallette is considering investing in an automated manufacturing system. Since competition is most keen for dishwashers, the production process for this line has been selected for initial evaluation. The automated system for the dishwasher line would replace an existing system (purchased one year ago for $6 million). Although the existing system will be fully depreciated in nine years, it is expected to last another 10 years. The automated system would also have a useful life of 10 years.
Capital Investment, Discount Rates, Intangible and Indirect Benefits, Time Horizon, Contemporary Manufacturing Environment Mallette Manufacturing, Inc., produces washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers. Because of increasing competition, Mallette is considering investing in an automated manufacturing system. Since competition is most keen for dishwashers, the production process for this line has been selected for initial evaluation. The automated system for the dishwasher line would replace an existing system (purchased one year ago for $6 million). Although the existing system will be fully depreciated in nine years, it is expected to last another 10 years. The automated system would also have a useful life of 10 years.   The automated system will cost $34 million to purchase, plus an estimated $20 million in software and implementation. (Assume that all investment outlays occur at the beginning of the first year.) If the automated equipment is purchased, the old equipment can be sold for $3 million. The automated system will require fewer parts for production and will produce with less waste. Because of this, the direct material cost per unit will be reduced by 25 percent. Automation will also require fewer support activities, and as a consequence, volume-related overhead will be reduced by $4 per unit and direct fixed overhead (other than depreciation) by $17 per unit. Direct labor is reduced by 60 percent. Assume, for simplicity, that the new investment will be depreciated on a pure straight-line basis for tax purposes with no salvage value. Ignore the half-life convention. The firm's cost of capital is 12 percent, but management chooses to use 20 percent as the required rate of return for evaluation of investments. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent. Required: 1. Compute the net present value for the old system and the automated system. Which system would the company choose? 2. Repeat the net present value analysis of Requirement 1, using 12 percent as the discount rate. 3. Upon seeing the projected sales for the old system, the marketing manager commented: Sales of 100,000 units per year cannot be maintained in the current competitive environment for more than one year unless we buy the automated system. The automated system will allow us to compete on the basis of quality and lead time. If we keep the old system, our sales will drop by 10,000 units per year. Repeat the net present value analysis, using this new information and a 12 percent discount rate. 4. An industrial engineer for Mallette noticed that salvage value for the automated equipment had not been included in the analysis. He estimated that the equipment could be sold for $4 million at the end of 10 years. He also estimated that the equipment of the old system would have no salvage value at the end of 10 years. Repeat the net present value analysis using this information, the information in Requirement 3, and a 12 percent discount rate. 5. Given the outcomes of the previous four requirements, comment on the importance of providing accurate inputs for assessing investments in automated manufacturing systems.
The automated system will cost $34 million to purchase, plus an estimated $20 million in software and implementation. (Assume that all investment outlays occur at the beginning of the first year.) If the automated equipment is purchased, the old equipment can be sold for $3 million.
The automated system will require fewer parts for production and will produce with less waste. Because of this, the direct material cost per unit will be reduced by 25 percent. Automation will also require fewer support activities, and as a consequence, volume-related overhead will be reduced by $4 per unit and direct fixed overhead (other than depreciation) by $17 per unit. Direct labor is reduced by 60 percent. Assume, for simplicity, that the new investment will be depreciated on a pure straight-line basis for tax purposes with no salvage value. Ignore the half-life convention.
The firm's cost of capital is 12 percent, but management chooses to use 20 percent as the required rate of return for evaluation of investments. The combined federal and state tax rate is 40 percent.
Required:
1. Compute the net present value for the old system and the automated system. Which system would the company choose?
2. Repeat the net present value analysis of Requirement 1, using 12 percent as the discount rate.
3. Upon seeing the projected sales for the old system, the marketing manager commented: "Sales of 100,000 units per year cannot be maintained in the current competitive environment for more than one year unless we buy the automated system. The automated system will allow us to compete on the basis of quality and lead time. If we keep the old system, our sales will drop by 10,000 units per year." Repeat the net present value analysis, using this new information and a 12 percent discount rate.
4. An industrial engineer for Mallette noticed that salvage value for the automated equipment had not been included in the analysis. He estimated that the equipment could be sold for $4 million at the end of 10 years. He also estimated that the equipment of the old system would have no salvage value at the end of 10 years. Repeat the net present value analysis using this information, the information in Requirement 3, and a 12 percent discount rate.
5. Given the outcomes of the previous four requirements, comment on the importance of providing accurate inputs for assessing investments in automated manufacturing systems.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
NPV Versus Internal Rate of Return
Keating Hospital is considering two different low-field MRI systems: the Clearlook System and the Goodview System. The projected annual revenues, annual costs, capital outlays, and project life for each system (in after-tax cash flows) are as follows:
NPV Versus Internal Rate of Return Keating Hospital is considering two different low-field MRI systems: the Clearlook System and the Goodview System. The projected annual revenues, annual costs, capital outlays, and project life for each system (in after-tax cash flows) are as follows:   Assume that the cost of capital for the company is 8 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the NPV for the Clearlook System. 2. Calculate the NPV for the Goodview System. Which MRI system would be chosen? 3. What if Keating Hospital wants to know why IRR is not being used for the investment analysis? Calculate the IRR for each project and explain why it is not suitable for choosing among mutually exclusive investments.
Assume that the cost of capital for the company is 8 percent.
Required:
1. Calculate the NPV for the Clearlook System.
2. Calculate the NPV for the Goodview System. Which MRI system would be chosen?
3. What if Keating Hospital wants to know why IRR is not being used for the investment analysis? Calculate the IRR for each project and explain why it is not suitable for choosing among mutually exclusive investments.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
Explain the important factors to consider for capital investment decisions relating to advanced technology and P2 opportunities.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
NPV, MAKE OR BUY, MACRS, BASIC ANALYSIS
Jonfran Company manufactures three different models of paper shredders including the waste container, which serves as the base. While the shredder heads are different for all three models, the waste container is the same. The number of waste containers that Jonfran will need during the next five years is estimated as follows:
NPV, MAKE OR BUY, MACRS, BASIC ANALYSIS Jonfran Company manufactures three different models of paper shredders including the waste container, which serves as the base. While the shredder heads are different for all three models, the waste container is the same. The number of waste containers that Jonfran will need during the next five years is estimated as follows:   The equipment used to manufacture the waste container must be replaced because it is broken and cannot be repaired. The new equipment would have a purchase price of $945,000 with terms of 2/10, n/30; the company's policy is to take all purchase discounts. The freight on the equipment would be $11,000, and installation costs would total $22,900. The equipment would be purchased in December 2010 and placed into service on January 1, 2011. It would have a five-year economic life and would be treated as three-year property under MACRS. This equipment is expected to have a salvage value of $12,000 at the end of its economic life in 2015. The new equipment would be more efficient than the old equipment, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in both direct materials and variable overhead. The savings in direct materials would result in an additional one-time decrease in working capital requirements of $2,500, resulting from a reduction in direct material inventories. This working capital reduction would be recognized at the time of equipment acquisition. The old equipment is fully depreciated and is not included in the fixed overhead. The old equipment from the plant can be sold for a salvage amount of $1,500. Rather than replace the equipment, one of Jonfran's production managers has suggested that the waste containers be purchased. One supplier has quoted a price of $27 per container. This price is $8 less than Jonfran's current manufacturing cost, which is as follows:   Jonfran uses a plantwide fixed overhead rate in its operations. If the waste containers are purchased outside, the salary and benefits of one supervisor, included in fixed overhead at $45,000, would be eliminated. There would be no other changes in the other cash and noncash items included in fixed overhead except depreciation on the new equipment. Jonfran is subject to a 40 percent tax rate. Management assumes that all cash flows occur at the end of the year and uses a 12 percent after-tax discount rate. Required: 1. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the make alternative. Calculate the NPV of the make alternative. 2. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the buy alternative. Calculate the NPV of the buy alternative. 3. Which should Jonfran do-make or buy the containers? What qualitative factors should be considered? (CMA adapted)
The equipment used to manufacture the waste container must be replaced because it is broken and cannot be repaired. The new equipment would have a purchase price of $945,000 with terms of 2/10, n/30; the company's policy is to take all purchase discounts. The freight on the equipment would be $11,000, and installation costs would total $22,900. The equipment would be purchased in December 2010 and placed into service on January 1, 2011. It would have a five-year economic life and would be treated as three-year property under MACRS. This equipment is expected to have a salvage value of $12,000 at the end of its economic life in 2015. The new equipment would be more efficient than the old equipment, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in both direct materials and variable overhead. The savings in direct materials would result in an additional one-time decrease in working capital requirements of $2,500, resulting from a reduction in direct material inventories. This working capital reduction would be recognized at the time of equipment acquisition.
The old equipment is fully depreciated and is not included in the fixed overhead. The old equipment from the plant can be sold for a salvage amount of $1,500. Rather than replace the equipment, one of Jonfran's production managers has suggested that the waste containers be purchased. One supplier has quoted a price of $27 per container. This price is $8 less than Jonfran's current manufacturing cost, which is as follows:
NPV, MAKE OR BUY, MACRS, BASIC ANALYSIS Jonfran Company manufactures three different models of paper shredders including the waste container, which serves as the base. While the shredder heads are different for all three models, the waste container is the same. The number of waste containers that Jonfran will need during the next five years is estimated as follows:   The equipment used to manufacture the waste container must be replaced because it is broken and cannot be repaired. The new equipment would have a purchase price of $945,000 with terms of 2/10, n/30; the company's policy is to take all purchase discounts. The freight on the equipment would be $11,000, and installation costs would total $22,900. The equipment would be purchased in December 2010 and placed into service on January 1, 2011. It would have a five-year economic life and would be treated as three-year property under MACRS. This equipment is expected to have a salvage value of $12,000 at the end of its economic life in 2015. The new equipment would be more efficient than the old equipment, resulting in a 25 percent reduction in both direct materials and variable overhead. The savings in direct materials would result in an additional one-time decrease in working capital requirements of $2,500, resulting from a reduction in direct material inventories. This working capital reduction would be recognized at the time of equipment acquisition. The old equipment is fully depreciated and is not included in the fixed overhead. The old equipment from the plant can be sold for a salvage amount of $1,500. Rather than replace the equipment, one of Jonfran's production managers has suggested that the waste containers be purchased. One supplier has quoted a price of $27 per container. This price is $8 less than Jonfran's current manufacturing cost, which is as follows:   Jonfran uses a plantwide fixed overhead rate in its operations. If the waste containers are purchased outside, the salary and benefits of one supervisor, included in fixed overhead at $45,000, would be eliminated. There would be no other changes in the other cash and noncash items included in fixed overhead except depreciation on the new equipment. Jonfran is subject to a 40 percent tax rate. Management assumes that all cash flows occur at the end of the year and uses a 12 percent after-tax discount rate. Required: 1. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the make alternative. Calculate the NPV of the make alternative. 2. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the buy alternative. Calculate the NPV of the buy alternative. 3. Which should Jonfran do-make or buy the containers? What qualitative factors should be considered? (CMA adapted)
Jonfran uses a plantwide fixed overhead rate in its operations. If the waste containers are purchased outside, the salary and benefits of one supervisor, included in fixed overhead at $45,000, would be eliminated. There would be no other changes in the other cash and noncash items included in fixed overhead except depreciation on the new equipment.
Jonfran is subject to a 40 percent tax rate. Management assumes that all cash flows occur at the end of the year and uses a 12 percent after-tax discount rate.
Required:
1. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the make alternative. Calculate the NPV of the make alternative.
2. Prepare a schedule of cash flows for the buy alternative. Calculate the NPV of the buy alternative.
3. Which should Jonfran do-make or buy the containers? What qualitative factors should be considered? (CMA adapted)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
What is the accounting rate of return?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
NPV: BASIC CONCEPTS
Mirar Vision Clinic is considering an investment that requires an outlay of $400,000 and promises a net cash inflow one year from now of $540,000. Assume the cost of capital is 10 percent.
Required:
1. Break the $450,000 future cash inflow into three components:
a. The return of the original investment
b. The cost of capital
c. The profit earned on the investment
2. Now, compute the present value of the profit earned on the investment.
3. Compute the NPV of the investment. Compare this with the present value of the profit computed in Requirement 2. What does this tell you about the meaning of NPV?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
Capital budgeting for environmental projects offers an interesting area for additional study. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has partnered with Tellus Institute ( www.tellus.org ) to further its ongoing interest in environmental cost management. Much of the the information relating to the U.S. EPA environmental accounting project can be found in the archives at the EPA webite ( www.epa.gov ). The EPA environmental accounting project dealt with such topics as environmental cost definitions, decisions using environmental costs, and capital budgeting. Using the EPA and Tellus websites as well as the World Resources Institute ( www.wri.org ) and other resources that you can locate, answer the following questions.
Required:
1. What evidence exists that firms use the payback period for screening and evaluating environmental projects? If payback is used, can you find the most common hurdle rate that firms use to justify environmental projects?
2. Are NPV and IRR used for environmental project approval? Can you find out what the hurdle rate is for IRR? Do you think this hurdle rate is the cost of capital? If not, then discuss why a different required rate is used.
3. Do you think the approval thresholds for environmental projects tend to be higher, lower, or the same when compared to nonenvironmental projects? See if you can find any evidence to support your viewpoint. Why might the approval thresholds differ from those of nonen- vironmental projects?
4. See if you can find a discussion on how capital budgeting for environmental projects may differ from that for conventional projects. List these differences.
Capital budgeting for environmental projects offers an interesting area for additional study. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has partnered with Tellus Institute ( www.tellus.org ) to further its ongoing interest in environmental cost management. Much of the the information relating to the U.S. EPA environmental accounting project can be found in the archives at the EPA webite ( www.epa.gov ). The EPA environmental accounting project dealt with such topics as environmental cost definitions, decisions using environmental costs, and capital budgeting. Using the EPA and Tellus websites as well as the World Resources Institute ( www.wri.org ) and other resources that you can locate, answer the following questions. Required: 1. What evidence exists that firms use the payback period for screening and evaluating environmental projects? If payback is used, can you find the most common hurdle rate that firms use to justify environmental projects? 2. Are NPV and IRR used for environmental project approval? Can you find out what the hurdle rate is for IRR? Do you think this hurdle rate is the cost of capital? If not, then discuss why a different required rate is used. 3. Do you think the approval thresholds for environmental projects tend to be higher, lower, or the same when compared to nonenvironmental projects? See if you can find any evidence to support your viewpoint. Why might the approval thresholds differ from those of nonen- vironmental projects? 4. See if you can find a discussion on how capital budgeting for environmental projects may differ from that for conventional projects. List these differences.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
37
After-Tax Cash Flows
Warren Company plans to open a new repair service center for one of its electronic products. The center requires an investment in depreciable assets costing $480,000. The assets will be depreciated on a straight-line basis, over four years, and have no expected salvage value. The annual income statement for the center is given below.
After-Tax Cash Flows Warren Company plans to open a new repair service center for one of its electronic products. The center requires an investment in depreciable assets costing $480,000. The assets will be depreciated on a straight-line basis, over four years, and have no expected salvage value. The annual income statement for the center is given below.   Required: 1. Using the income approach, calculate the after-tax cash flows. 2. Using the decomposition approach, calculate the after-tax cash flows for each item of the income statement and show that the total is the same as the income approach. 3. What if it is desirable to express the decomposition approach in a spreadsheet format for the four years to facilitate the use of spreadsheet software packages? Express the decomposition approach in a spreadsheet format, with a column for each income item and a total column.
Required:
1. Using the income approach, calculate the after-tax cash flows.
2. Using the decomposition approach, calculate the after-tax cash flows for each item of the income statement and show that the total is the same as the income approach.
3. What if it is desirable to express the decomposition approach in a spreadsheet format for the four years to facilitate the use of spreadsheet software packages? Express the decomposition approach in a spreadsheet format, with a column for each income item and a total column.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
38
Explain what a postaudit is and how it can provide useful input for future capital investment decisions-especially those involving advanced technology.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
39
What is the cost of capital? What role does it play in capital investment decisions?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
40
Solving for Unknowns
Consider each of the following independent cases.
Required:
1. Hal's Stunt Company is investing $120,000 in a project that will yield a uniform series of cash inflows over the next four years. If the internal rate of return is 14 percent, how much cash inflow per year can be expected?
2. Warner Medical Clinic has decided to invest in some new blood diagnostic equipment. The equipment will have a three-year life and will produce a uniform series of cash savings. The net present value of the equipment is $1,750, using a discount rate of 8 percent. The internal rate of return is 12 percent. Determine the investment and the amount of cash savings realized each year.
3. A new lathe costing $60,096 will produce savings of $12,000 per year. How many years must the lathe last if an IRR of 18 percent is realized?
4. The NPV of a new product (a new brand of candy) is $6,075. The product has a life of four years and produces the following cash flows:
Solving for Unknowns Consider each of the following independent cases. Required: 1. Hal's Stunt Company is investing $120,000 in a project that will yield a uniform series of cash inflows over the next four years. If the internal rate of return is 14 percent, how much cash inflow per year can be expected? 2. Warner Medical Clinic has decided to invest in some new blood diagnostic equipment. The equipment will have a three-year life and will produce a uniform series of cash savings. The net present value of the equipment is $1,750, using a discount rate of 8 percent. The internal rate of return is 12 percent. Determine the investment and the amount of cash savings realized each year. 3. A new lathe costing $60,096 will produce savings of $12,000 per year. How many years must the lathe last if an IRR of 18 percent is realized? 4. The NPV of a new product (a new brand of candy) is $6,075. The product has a life of four years and produces the following cash flows:   The cost of the project is three times the cash flow produced in Year 4. The discount rate is 10 percent. Find the cost of the project and the cash flow for Year 4.
The cost of the project is three times the cash flow produced in Year 4. The discount rate is 10 percent. Find the cost of the project and the cash flow for Year 4.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
41
The IRR is the true or actual rate of return being earned by the project. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
42
Explain what sensitivity analysis is. How can it help in capital budgeting decisions?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 42 flashcards in this deck.