expand icon
book Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge

Edition 4ISBN: 978-0324660609
book Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge cover

Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge

Edition 4ISBN: 978-0324660609
Exercise 14
Use the data in PHILLIPS.RAW to answer these questions.
(i) Estimate the models in (18.48) and (18.49) using the data through 1997. Do the parameter estimates change much compared with (18.48) and (18.49)
(ii) Use the new equations to forecast unem1998; round to two places after the deci¬mal. Which equation produces a better forecast
(iii) As we discussed in the text, the forecast for unem1998 using (18.49) is 4.90. Compare this with the forecast obtained using the data through 1997. Does using the extra year of data to obtain the parameter estimates produce a better forecast
(iv) Use the model estimated in (18.48) to obtain a two-step-ahead forecast of unem. That is, forecast unem1998 using equation (18.55) with Use the data in PHILLIPS.RAW to answer these questions. (i) Estimate the models in (18.48) and (18.49) using the data through 1997. Do the parameter estimates change much compared with (18.48) and (18.49)  (ii) Use the new equations to forecast unem1998; round to two places after the deci¬mal. Which equation produces a better forecast  (iii) As we discussed in the text, the forecast for unem1998 using (18.49) is 4.90. Compare this with the forecast obtained using the data through 1997. Does using the extra year of data to obtain the parameter estimates produce a better forecast  (iv) Use the model estimated in (18.48) to obtain a two-step-ahead forecast of unem. That is, forecast unem1998 using equation (18.55) with   = 1.572,   =.732, and h = 2. Is this better or worse than the one-step-ahead forecast obtained by plugging unem1997 = 4.9 into (18.48) = 1.572, Use the data in PHILLIPS.RAW to answer these questions. (i) Estimate the models in (18.48) and (18.49) using the data through 1997. Do the parameter estimates change much compared with (18.48) and (18.49)  (ii) Use the new equations to forecast unem1998; round to two places after the deci¬mal. Which equation produces a better forecast  (iii) As we discussed in the text, the forecast for unem1998 using (18.49) is 4.90. Compare this with the forecast obtained using the data through 1997. Does using the extra year of data to obtain the parameter estimates produce a better forecast  (iv) Use the model estimated in (18.48) to obtain a two-step-ahead forecast of unem. That is, forecast unem1998 using equation (18.55) with   = 1.572,   =.732, and h = 2. Is this better or worse than the one-step-ahead forecast obtained by plugging unem1997 = 4.9 into (18.48) =.732, and h = 2. Is this better or worse than the one-step-ahead forecast obtained by plugging unem1997 = 4.9 into (18.48)
Explanation
like image
like image
no-answer
This question doesn’t have an expert verified answer yet, let Quizplus AI Copilot help.
close menu
Introductory Econometrics 4th Edition by Jeffrey Wooldridge
cross icon