Deck 11: Immanuel Kant

Question 1

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-What is a "maxim," for Kant? What role do maxims play in Kant's ethics? Provide an example of a maxim and explain how it would figure in the moral assessment of an action, on Kant's view.

Answer 1

No Answer

Question 2

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant claims that there is a single fundamental principle of morality, but he states the principle in a number of ways. State two of Kant's formulations, and explain each one. Do you think the two formulations are really equivalent? Defend your answer.

Answer 2

No Answer

Question 3

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Write an essay applying Kant's ethical theory to a particular case in which one is faced with a moral decision. What considerations would Kant regard as relevant in deciding what to do? Do you think Kant's theory provides the correct verdict in this case? Why or why not?

Answer 3

No Answer

Question 4

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Under what conditions does an act have moral worth, according to Kant? Give an example to illustrate this idea. Do you find Kant's position plausible? What do you think is the strongest objection to it? Can this objection be overcome?

Question 5

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-What does it mean to say that something is "good without qualification"? What is the only thing that Kant thinks is good in this way, and why? Do you agree with him about this?

Question 6

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-What is an imperative, in Kant's philosophy? What is the difference between hypothetical and categorical imperatives? Into which category does he think moral demands fall, and why?

Question 7

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-What does Kant believe is the supreme principle of morality? What examples does he invoke to demonstrate the application of this principle? Do you think the principle provides a reliable guide to our moral obligations? Why or why not?

Question 8

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, the ground of moral obligation must be sought in:

A) human nature.
B) a priori concepts of pure reason.
C) God's commandments.
D) the laws of nature.

Question 9

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, moral laws are:

A) necessary and apply to all rational beings.
B) contingent and apply only to human beings.
C) culturally relative.
D) grounded in God's commands.

Question 10

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, perfect duties:

A) prescribe policies.
B) prescribe goals.
C) admit of no exceptions.
D) admit of some exceptions.

Question 11

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant claims that acting (as opposed to having an involuntary spasm) presupposes:

A) that one acts for a reason.
B) that one acts on a desire.
C) that one acts to promote the good.
D) that one acts in accordance with God's will.

Question 12

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-In Kant's terminology, a maxim is:

A) a principle on which one acts.
B) a moral duty.
C) an action that brings about more good than any other available action.
D) a bit of folk wisdom.

Question 13

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, morality requires us to:

A) perform the action that leads to the greatest total happiness.
B) act only on maxims that we can will to become universal laws.
C) behave only in such a way as a perfectly virtuous person would behave.
D) place the interests of others above the interests of ourselves.

Question 14

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant claims that the dictates of morality are:

A) contractarian imperatives.
B) hypothetical imperatives.
C) categorical imperatives.
D) consequentialist imperatives.

Question 15

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, the supreme principle of morality is:

A) analytic and a priori.
B) analytic and a posteriori.
C) synthetic and a priori.
D) synthetic and a posteriori.

Question 16

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to the humanity formulation of the categorical imperative, we should always act:

A) so as to treat humanity as an end in itself.
B) so as to treat humanity as a means.
C) so as to maximize the well-being of humanity.
D) so as to put the interests of humanity before your own interests.

Question 17

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant claims that the moral law is given to each person by:

A) society.
B) one's own will.
C) God.
D) Nature.

Question 18

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant refers to a will that is determined by things outside of itself as:

A) compelled.
B) heteronomous.
C) contradictory.
D) debased.

Question 19

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, the basis of morality is the concept of:

A) charity.
B) fairness.
C) piety.
D) freedom.

Question 20

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, pure moral philosophy is partly empirical.

Question 21

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant claims that an action has moral worth only if it is done for the sake of duty.

Question 22

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant argues that there is a single supreme principle of morality.

Question 23

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, it is always irrational to behave immorally.

Question 24

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant claims that moral obligations are categorical imperatives.

Question 25

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-When a person acts dutifully toward others out of compassion, the action has no genuinely moral worth according to Kant.

Question 26

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, whether an act is morally right depends on the consequences of the act.

Question 27

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant claims that it is sometimes permissible to borrow money and promise to repay it, even though you know that repayment will never happen.

Question 28

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-According to Kant, that we have freedom of the will can be demonstrated by experience.

Question 29

Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
Kant argues that moral philosophy should proceed in an a priori fashion, without consulting experience. To develop a theory along these lines, Kant begins by examining the moral concepts at the heart of ordinary moral thought. According to Kant, the only thing that can be said to be good without qualification-that is, good in all circumstances-is the good will. To have a good will requires that one act not in conformity with one's duty, but for the sake of duty. Only when actions are performed for the sake of duty, Kant says, do they have any true moral worth.
But what is our moral duty? Kant claims that for a requirement to be genuinely moral, it must be a categorical imperative. Whereas hypothetical imperatives are simply claims about which means are suitable to satisfying our desires, Kant asserts that moral requirements apply to us independently of any end we happen to endorse. Furthermore, according to Kant, all of our moral duties derive from one single categorical imperative, which is the supreme principle of morality. Kant formulates this principle in several ways. According to the formula of universal law, we must "Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." A maxim, in Kant's sense, is the subjective principle on which one acts in a given circumstance. According to the formula of universal law, we test the permissibility of our actions by asking whether we could consistently will that everyone act on our maxim.
The second formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant provides is the formula of humanity, which states, "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in any other person, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." This formulation illustrates Kant's view that every human being has dignity, and therefore must be treated with respect.
Kant insists that both formulations of the categorical imperative are equivalent. By focusing on the formal constraints of reason, the formula of universal law captures the intuitive thought: how would you feel if everyone did that? By focusing on the value of reason, the formula of humanity captures the thought that rational agency must respect, by preserving or promoting, the free exercise of everyone's rational agency.
-Kant argues that experience cannot give us any knowledge of things in themselves.