Deck 8: Searches With Consent
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/18
Play
Full screen (f)
Deck 8: Searches With Consent
1
To be valid, consent must be voluntary and intelligent, based on ________.
A) Mitigating circumstances
B) External circumstances
C) Internal circumstances
D) Totality of circumstances
A) Mitigating circumstances
B) External circumstances
C) Internal circumstances
D) Totality of circumstances
Totality of circumstances
2
________ means the consent was not forced or coerced; ________ means the person giving consent must know what he or she is doing.
A) Voluntary/intelligent
B) Intelligent/voluntary
C) Independent/reasonable
D) Reasonable/independent
A) Voluntary/intelligent
B) Intelligent/voluntary
C) Independent/reasonable
D) Reasonable/independent
Voluntary/intelligent
3
Consent obtained by deception through a claim of lawful authority, which did not in fact exist, is ________.
A) Voluntary
B) No voluntary
C) Intelligent
D) No intelligent
A) Voluntary
B) No voluntary
C) Intelligent
D) No intelligent
No voluntary
4
In ________, the Court held that knowledge of the right to refuse consent is not a prerequisite for voluntary consent.
A) Bumper v. North Carolina
B) Stoner v. California
C) Chimel v. California
D) Schneckcloth v. Bustamonte
A) Bumper v. North Carolina
B) Stoner v. California
C) Chimel v. California
D) Schneckcloth v. Bustamonte
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
In Illinois v. Rodriguez, the Court held that searches in which the person giving consent has ________ authority are valid.
A) Plain
B) Apparent
C) Actual
D) Mere
A) Plain
B) Apparent
C) Actual
D) Mere
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
The ________ rule says that consent given by a third party whom the police reasonably believe to possess common authority over the premises is valid even if it is later established that the person did not in fact have that authority.
A) "Plain authority"
B) "Apparent authority"
C) "Actual authority"
D) "Mere authority"
A) "Plain authority"
B) "Apparent authority"
C) "Actual authority"
D) "Mere authority"
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
Which case law establishes that consent for the police to search a vehicle also extends to closed containers found inside the vehicle?
A) Florida v. Royer
B) Georgia v. Randolph
C) Florida v. Jimeno
D) Carroll v. United States
A) Florida v. Royer
B) Georgia v. Randolph
C) Florida v. Jimeno
D) Carroll v. United States
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Consent is an exception to the Fourth Amendment rule requiring ________ and ________ in search and seizure cases.
A) Probable cause/a warrant
B) Probable cause/permission
C) Reasonable suspicion/a warrant
D) Reasonable suspicion/permission
A) Probable cause/a warrant
B) Probable cause/permission
C) Reasonable suspicion/a warrant
D) Reasonable suspicion/permission
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
Which of the following types of consent to search are valid, if voluntary and intelligent?
A) Consent given by a business employee
B) Consent given by a college or university administrator
C) Consent given by a husband or wife
D) Consent given by a landlord
A) Consent given by a business employee
B) Consent given by a college or university administrator
C) Consent given by a husband or wife
D) Consent given by a landlord
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
In ________, the Court held that a warrantless search of a shared dwelling over the express refusal of consent by a physically present resident violates the Fourth Amendment.
A) Georgia v. Randolph
B) Florida v. Jimeno
C) Florida v. Royer
D) Kent v. United States
A) Georgia v. Randolph
B) Florida v. Jimeno
C) Florida v. Royer
D) Kent v. United States
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
Mere silence or failure to object to a search does not necessarily indicate valid consent.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
Written consent is constitutionally required.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
A hotel guest is not entitled to protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Consent given after an illegal act by the police is not valid because such consent is tainted.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Consent to enter a dwelling means consent to search.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
The scope of an allowable search depends on the type of consent given.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
The lawful occupant of a house or apartment may consent to a search if the other occupant is not present or was removed on objectively reasonable grounds.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
Consent search given a hotel clerk would be considered valid.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 18 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck