In Near v.Minnesota ,the Supreme Court ruled that
A) prior restraint was unconstitutional in any circumstance.
B) prior restraint was unconstitutional in this case.
C) prior restraint may be used to block the publication of anti-Semitic newspapers.
D) prior restraint was not unconstitutional.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: The balancing theory that weighs the interests
Q10: The outcome of the seditious libel trial
Q11: The Brandenburg test for incitement is
Q12: As described in the textbook,the access theory
Q13: The absolutist theory was adopted by a
Q15: The Gitlow ruling is important because
A)it barred
Q16: According to the textbook,a great "historical myth"
Q17: In order to justify a regulation on
Q18: The case of United States v.Bell involved
Q19: The First Amendment was adopted in the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents