While driving home from work,Bailey's car is struck from behind by a van full of drunken college students. Asimov is the driver of the van. The resulting damage to Bailey's car totals $7,000. Bailey files a claim under his own auto insurance policy to have his car repaired,but his insurance policy only covers $6,000 of the $7,000 loss. Bailey pays the remaining $1,000 of the loss out of his pocket. Which of the following is a true statement?
A) Bailey has no legal right of subrogation against Asimov for the $1,000 that he had to pay out of his pocket
B) Bailey's insurer has no legal right of subrogation against Asimov for the $6,000 of damages it had to pay to Bailey
C) Both Bailey and his insurer have subrogation RIGHTS against Asimov for the damages he (Asimov) caused
D) Bailey has the right under the principle of indemnity to now sue Asimov personally for the $7,000 damages to his car
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: The doctrine of reasonable expectations has typically
Q23: Void ab initio means
A)void at the option
Q26: Joe has a dispute with his insurance
Q28: Which of the following is correct concerning
Q29: Christopher purchases an insurance contract with the
Q43: Sarah has a house valued at $200,000
Q46: Under a contract of adhesion:
A) subrogation is
Q49: The principle of insurable interest is important
Q58: Tiffany, who is married to Saul, takes
Q59: The doctrine of proximate cause:
A) forces the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents