Which of the following is not a valid reason to carry Medical Payments coverage?
A)guests injured in an automobile accident might hesitate to sue their hosts
B)a negligent host would probably feel a moral obligation to pay for medical bills for injured guests
C)to facilitate settlement for relatively small amounts of medical expense
D)to provide reasonably priced health insurance for the insured and his family

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Medical Payments coverage is not a substitute for health insurance, and it is not designed to provide ongoing or long-term medical care. It is intended to cover the immediate medical expenses of anyone injured in an accident, regardless of who is at fault. Therefore, carrying Medical Payments coverage is not a valid reason to provide health insurance for the insured and his family.

Which of the Following Is Not a Valid Reason to Carry