Crandall and Colleagues Compared Two Groups of Participants' Responses to Two

Crandall and colleagues compared two groups of participants' responses to two different tasks.One group was to indicate how acceptable it was to have negative feelings toward particular groups in society and the other group was asked how positively or negatively they felt about these social groups.The results and their interpretation suggest

A) the low correlation between the two sets of data mean that people are adept at covering up their hidden prejudices.
B) the moderate correlation means that although some people show prejudiced attitudes not everyone shares these views.
C) the low correlation means that there are few shared norms about which groups are targets of prejudice in society.
D) the low correlation is not an important finding because it can be interpreted in several different ways.
E) the high correlation between the two sets of data means that asking about the norms of prejudice is practically the same thing as asking about the actual prejudicial attitudes held.