In May of 2018,Jones went to C & C Bank to apply for a loan on a home he wanted to purchase.C & C Bank loaned the money to Jones because he had excellent credit.C & C never inspected the property Jones was purchasing.Two weeks later,five rusty and leaking 55-gallon drums of a toxic substance were found buried in a creekbed in Jones' backyard.Jones and the Bank's position with regard to liability for cleanup on the property would be:
A) liability would be imposed by CERCLA as strict liability for owners of contaminated property even if they acquired the property without knowledge of contamination.
B) they would not be liable because they were innocent landowners as provided for in SARA,and they would have an automatic defense.
C) that,if the Bank and Jones made an appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property before purchase,they may not be liable.
D) if it could be proven that neither Jones nor the bank unlawfully disposed of the toxic waste,they could not be found liable under CERCLA.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: An approved SIP is treated as both
Q41: NEPA requires that the EIS contain:
A) an
Q42: Common problems with private causes of action
Q43: The 1977 amendments to the Clean Water
Q44: The CERCLA trust fund is financed by
Q46: In 1976,RCRA was enacted by Congress:
A) to
Q47: The term "scoping" concerning EIS procedures includes:
A)
Q48: Which of the following best describes the
Q49: Petrol Corp.owns several drilling operations in the
Q50: In suing to recover for environmental damage,under
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents