Pam certified a statement prepared by Jace,her employee,without checking his work.Jace was never known to be anything but diligent and his integrity had never been questioned.The audit contained gross misstatements.Pam defends a suit against her claiming "due diligence." She will:
A) succeed,since she had no reason to believe her employee would lie.
B) succeed,because a reasonable person would not have inquired further.
C) fail,because due diligence requires reasonable investigation.
D) fail,because she is automatically liable for her employee's act.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q38: Which of the following can be the
Q39: An accountant's legal liability is imposed both
Q40: In which of the following types of
Q41: Which of the following would NOT constitute
Q42: Audit working papers would include all but:
A)
Q44: An accountant can ethically disclose a client's
Q45: Zander decides to invest in the stock
Q46: Which of the following is correct with
Q47: Wurst & Wurst is the accounting firm
Q48: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in response
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents