In 2007,the Supreme Court held that vertical price restraints are per se violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

Name: In 2007,the Supreme Court held that vertical price restraints are per se violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.8 (40 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In 2007, the Supreme Court held in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. that vertical price restraints are subject to the rule of reason analysis, rather than being per se violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

In 2007,the Supreme Court Held That Vertical Price Restraints Are