An intoxicated person must have been so intoxicated as to have been unable to understand the consequences of his actions or have been unable to act in a reasonable manner in order to avoid a contract.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Intoxication can be a defense to contract enforcement if the person was so intoxicated that they did not understand the consequences of their actions or were not able to act in a reasonable manner to avoid the contract. However, if the person was only slightly intoxicated or their intoxication did not affect their ability to understand or act in a reasonable manner, then the defense of intoxication may not be successful.

An Intoxicated Person Must Have Been So Intoxicated as to Have