Henry was burning leaves in his backyard.One of the burning leaves was lifted by the wind into Emilio's yard next door.It landed on the lawn mower which exploded,setting fire to the wooden lawn furniture.Henry's best argument against liability would be:
A) that the leaf was not a substantial factor in causing the damage.
B) res ipsa loquitur.
C) that it was not foreseeable that the lawn mower would explode.
D) that the damage was not caused by the leaf but by the gasoline.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Henry's best argument against liability would be that it was not foreseeable that the lawn mower would explode. This is because the principle of foreseeability is a crucial element in determining whether the defendant's conduct was negligent or not. If the defendant could not have reasonably anticipated that their actions could cause harm, they cannot be held liable for the resulting damages. In this case, Henry could argue that the explosion of the lawn mower was an unforeseeable consequence of burning leaves in his backyard, and therefore he should not be held responsible for any damages that occurred in Emilio's yard.

Henry Was Burning Leaves in His Backyard