A ninety-year-old patient walked away from a nursing home and wandered onto some nearby railroad tracks.Once on the tracks,the patient stumbled and sprained his ankle.A few minutes later a train approached.The engineer saw the man on the track and could have stopped,but the train's brakes were defective.As a result,the train hit and killed the man.His family is suing the railroad for negligence.In this case:
A) the patient has assumed the risk of wandering onto the railroad tracks.
B) because the patient was contributorily negligent,most states would hold that the railroad has no liability.
C) in states that follow the contributory negligence rule,the train had the last clear chance to avoid the accident,so the patient's negligence does not bar his estate's recovery.
D) the train's striking of the man was an intervening cause,so the railroad company was strictly liable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q57: Wyatt and Sally started a charcoal fire
Q58: Mark is out sailing in his boat
Q59: The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur would
Q60: Two of the factors that are taken
Q61: Conduct on the part of the plaintiff
Q63: Defenses to an action in strict liability
Q64: A form of strict liability applies to
Q65: Perry is injured on the job at
Q66: Adam doesn't like having neighborhood teenagers walk
Q67: To which of the following does a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents