I carried out a series of experiments testing the effect of caffeine on mice.I used two mice.I fed one mouse caffeinated water and fed the other plain water.I then measured the ability of each mouse to find its way through a maze.I timed their progress.My results were exciting and conclusive,the caffeinated mouse found his way through the maze much more rapidly and accurately than the noncaffeinated mouse.I sent my results to a peer-reviewed journal but they rejected my paper.They said the results were not valid.Why?
A) I should have let the mice go through the maze at different times.
B) I should have given the mouse different amounts of caffeine.
C) I didn't use the right form of caffeine.
D) I didn't have enough mice in the study.
E) None of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q86: A positive correlation on a memory test
Q87: A small sample size
A) will likely yield
Q88: Peer review means what in relation to
Q89: All of the following are true of
Q90: Correlation is
A) a problem encountered when the
Q92: Which published scientific data would be most
Q93: You are reviewing the results of five
Q94: Which sample group would give the most
Q95: If you read about several studies on
Q96: A positive correlation in a scientific study
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents