Compare and contrast the models of stress proposed by Richard Lazarus and Hans Selye.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Richard Lazarus and Hans Selye both proposed models of stress, but their approaches and theories differ in several key ways.

Hans Selye's model of stress, known as the General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS), suggests that the body's response to stress occurs in three stages: alarm, resistance, and exhaustion. Selye believed that the body's response to stress is non-specific, meaning that it responds in the same way regardless of the source of the stressor. He also emphasized the role of physiological responses, such as the release of stress hormones, in the body's reaction to stress.

On the other hand, Richard Lazarus proposed the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, which focuses on the individual's cognitive appraisal of a stressor and their ability to cope with it. According to Lazarus, stress is a result of the individual's perception and interpretation of a situation, rather than the situation itself. He also emphasized the role of coping strategies in managing stress, suggesting that individuals can actively influence their stress levels through their thoughts and actions.

In contrast to Selye's non-specific physiological response, Lazarus's model highlights the individual and subjective nature of stress. While Selye's model focuses on the body's automatic response to stress, Lazarus's model emphasizes the role of cognitive processes and coping strategies in the experience of stress.

Overall, Selye's model of stress emphasizes the physiological response to stressors, while Lazarus's model focuses on the individual's cognitive appraisal and coping mechanisms. Both models have contributed to our understanding of stress, but they offer different perspectives on the nature of stress and how it is experienced and managed.

Compare and Contrast the Models of Stress Proposed by Richard