Someone presenting a deontological argument for not poaching elephants for their ivory would argue that doing so _____________.
A)robs elephants of a full and happy life
B)costs more in lost tourism than is gained by the sale of ivory
C)would be acceptable,but only if more economic gain occurs from selling the ivory than is lost in tourism income
D)violates international laws

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A deontological argument would focus on the moral duty and obligation to follow laws and regulations that prohibit poaching elephants for their ivory. Therefore, violating international laws that protect elephants from poaching would be seen as inherently wrong and not morally justifiable, regardless of any potential economic benefits or harm to the animals.

Someone Presenting a Deontological Argument for Not Poaching Elephants for Their