Polly sold Jason a used car for $1,000.Their contract provided that the engine in the car was in good shape,a true statement as far as Polly knew.Unfortunately,the day after Jason purchased the car,it broke down and was discovered to have significant engine problems.Jason told Polly that he wanted a refund.Polly told him that he was not entitled to a refund because she did not lie and that as far as she knew,there was nothing wrong with the car.Which of the following is true?
A) Jason is entitled to a refund because of the breach of an express warranty.
B) Jason is entitled to a refund because of a breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
C) Jason is entitled to a refund only if he can obtain evidence that Polly lied.
D) Jason is not entitled to a refund under any circumstances because the vehicle was used.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: What does Section 201 of the UCC
Q49: Chris sold Valerie a home containing a
Q49: If a buyer wrongfully cancels a contract
Q50: A(n)_ contract occurs when one party is
Q51: Under the UCC,which of the following is
Q52: Explain the different types of warranties that
Q52: Indicate how a seller may disclaim or
Q57: Kiera and Ben entered into a contract
Q59: Which of the following is not true
Q61: What must be established in order for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents