What did the court rule in Pegram v.Herdrich,the case discussed in the text in which the plaintiff's appendix ruptured while she was waiting several days for an ultrasound,and she claimed that the HMO involved breached its fiduciary duty by rewarding physicians for cutting costs?
A) That the HMO was a fiduciary because it could control medical treatment options.
B) That the HMO was not a fiduciary under the circumstances of the case.
C) That the HMO was a fiduciary only because mixed eligibility decisions were involved.
D) That the HMO was a fiduciary under state law but not under ERISA.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q47: Fact pattern 14-1
Constance is a CEO of
Q48: Cynthia receives health benefits under her employer-sponsored
Q49: What is the meaning of the term
Q50: Which of the following involves a promise
Q51: Which of the following is true regarding
Q52: Fact pattern 14-2
Jan is a participant in
Q53: What three fundamental beliefs to the Securities
Q55: Fact pattern 14-2
Jan is a participant in
Q56: Which of the following involves a promise
Q57: What criticism of restricted stock plans do
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents