Pollutants
A chemical plant's production adds pollutants to a stream which irrigates a farm's crops. The pollutants damage the farm's crops, increasing the firm's costs by $800 per month. The crop damage may be eliminated in two ways: the chemical plant can install a new filtering system costing $300 per month, or the farm can install a new irrigation system costing $600 per month.
-Refer to Pollutants.Suppose transactions costs are zero.Who should be made liable for the crop damage if the goal is to achieve an efficient outcome?
A) The chemical plant should be made liable,because it is the source of the pollution.
B) The chemical plant should be made liable,because it possesses the least-cost method of eliminating the externality.
C) The farm should be made liable,because it can receive a bribe from the chemical plant.
D) An efficient outcome will be achieved no matter who is made liable for the crop damage.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Pollutants
A chemical plant's production adds pollutants to
Q24: Negligence is irrelevant when a strict liability
Q25: The doctrine of Respondent Superior contends that
Q26: According to Pigovian analysis,competitive behavior will result
Q27: The principle of general average gives a
Q29: A Pigovian tax internalizes an external cost
Q30: Negative Externality
The following questions refer to the
Q31: What does it mean to say that
Q32: Negative Externality
The following questions refer to the
Q33: Coase argues that every case of externalities
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents