If a U.S.company and an Austrian company end up in a dispute about a contract they entered into that contains an arbitration clause,a case brought before a U.S.court would:
A) be heard by the U.S. court since arbitration clauses are not popular with such courts.
B) be heard by the U.S. court if the U.S. company can show it will be harmed by arbitration.
C) not be heard by the U.S. court because U.S. courts accept arbitration as a form of dispute resolution.
D) none of these are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: In a California lawsuit between a U.S.resident
Q32: In the Fallhowe v.Hilton Worldwide case,the U.S.court
Q33: With mediation as a form of dispute
Q34: If mediation is chosen as a form
Q35: In an arbitration agreement,the parties may choose
Q37: One advantage of arbitration is that awards
Q38: Zapata,a Texas Corporation,entered into a contract with
Q39: ADR refers to:
A) Alternative (or Alternate) Dispute
Q40: Two of the disadvantages of arbitration are
Q41: The disadvantages of arbitration include:
I.Limited Discovery
II.Limited Rights
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents