In J.Gerber & Co.v.SS Sabine Howaldt,a lawsuit brought by the owner of cargo (steel products) against an ocean carrier for damage to the cargo caused by sea water and moisture,the court ruled that:
A) the turbulent seas and high winds were not sufficiently severe to constitute a "peril of the sea" under COGSA.
B) the carrier was liable because the vessel was not seaworthy when it left port.
C) the carrier was liable because it had not used usual good seamanship in handling the vessel.
D) the carrier was not liable because it proved that the damage was caused by a peril of the sea.
E) none of these are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: Where the shipper fails to declare the
Q20: Today,COGSA allows ocean carriers to put clauses
Q21: A carrier is liable to the buyer
Q22: Ocean carriers are liable for damages resulting
Q23: In the event of cargo damage,an action
Q25: Himalaya Clauses in bills of lading:
A) protect
Q26: The law of general average is found
Q27: An Inchmaree clause in a marine insurance
Q28: Transporting new cars above deck on an
Q29: Ocean carriers are not liable for more
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents