A orally agrees with B to lease an office in B's building for four years.A moves in and renovates the office and also pays monthly rent to B pursuant to their agreement.B now decides to arbitrarily tell A to leave because there is no lease.If A wants to make B specifically perform the lease,a court will most likely find that
A) the lease is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds,but A's acts will give him a quantum meruit claim for the renovations.
B) the lease is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds,but A's acts constitute part performance and the lease should be upheld.
C) the lease is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds,and A's acts do not amount to part performance so effectively there is no lease.
D) the lease is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds,but A's acts will give him a claim for unjust enrichment for the renovations.
E) all of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Where there has been a breach of
Q10: A enters into a lease with B
Q11: A rents his property to B for
Q12: A and B are friends,and for years
Q13: Mary's tenancy is due to end on
Q15: Waste,in connection with leased premises,refers to
A)garbage bought
Q16: To end a periodic tenancy,the landlord or
Q17: Edward enters into a lease with Charles
Q18: A and B enter into a lease
Q19: A and B enter into a lease
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents