For the most part,Canadian courts apply modified principles of negligence to determine liability.Some critics of fault-based systems propose that victims be compensated through "no-fault" government schemes-similar to those already in place relating to motor vehicle accidents and workers compensation.Others argue that the law should impose "strict liability" in all areas in which plaintiffs have traditionally struggled to establish fault,namely,against manufacturers of goods or products.Explain the three bases for awarding compensation to injured parties and the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q64: How can the plaintiff's own conduct affect
Q65: The concept of foreseeability in tort law
Q66: Jack owns a pub.One evening,Jim,a friend,comes into
Q67: Cheri met her friend Julie at an
Q68: Troy wants desperately to help his sister
Q69: Criminal law and tort law focus on
Q70: Explain how a warning issued by a
Q72: The standard of care in the law
Q73: Explain how the defence of qualified privilege
Q74: Foreseeability is a major element in the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents