The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:
A) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that the defendant would engage in this conduct?
B) Given this particular injury to the plaintiff, was it foreseeable that the defendant was the cause?
C) Should it have been foreseeable to the defendant that defendant's conduct could lead to this kind of injury?
D) Was the injury foreseeable to the plaintiff prior to the injury's occurrence?
E) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that this kind of injury could occur under the particular conditions that the injury did occur?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q104: Which of the following is true about
Q105: The best description of misappropriation of the
Q106: Which of the following is true about
Q107: Which of the following must the plaintiff
Q108: The doctrine that is applied when a
Q110: To succeed in a malicious prosecution lawsuit,the
Q111: Which of the following is the most
Q112: The doctrine that shifts the burden of
Q113: Wayne is showing off by driving his
Q114: In terms of fraud liability,the wrongdoer's knowledge
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents