In the Palsgraf case,foreseeability was an issue.What question did the court address in the case?
A) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that the scales would fall?
B) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that someone in the train station would be carrying explosive fireworks?
C) Was it foreseeable to the passenger carrying the fireworks that they might explode and injure someone?
D) Was it foreseeable to the railroad employee helping the passenger onto the train that doing so might lead to injury to Ms. Palsgraf or another bystander?
E) Was it foreseeable to Ms. Palsgraf that her injury would have been caused by an explosion?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q133: A plaintiff wants to sue on a
Q134: While attending a baseball game cheering for
Q135: Which of the following is true about
Q136: Persons who engage in abnormally dangerous activities:
A)
Q137: The legal effect of the presence of
Q139: Bart Steveman is sitting in the first
Q140: Which of the following torts allows a
Q141: Does the requirement for a plaintiff in
Q142: The proximate cause requirement for a negligence
Q143: Cindy was riding her bicycle on a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents