In the case in which Wal-Mart was sued by Samara Brothers under the Lanham Act for selling knockoff clothes designed by Samara Brothers,what did the Supreme Court rule?
A) that a producer such as Samara must show that the allegedly infringing feature is likely to cause confusion with the product for which protection is sought
B) that in an action for infringement of unregistered trade dress, a product's design is protectable only upon a showing of secondary meaning
C) that in an action for infringement of unregistered trade dress, a product's design is protectable without a showing of secondary meaning
D) that a producer such as Samara is not required to show that the allegedly infringing feature is likely to cause confusion with the product for which protection is sought
E) that a producer such as Samara must show that the allegedly infringing feature is likely to cause confusion with the product for which protection is sought, and that in an action for infringement of unregistered trade dress, a product's design is protectable only upon a showing of secondary meaning
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q110: A business that undertakes activities that benefit
Q111: The four theories of social responsibility of
Q112: Peter runs an auto air conditioning repair
Q113: You,your father and your sister are rock
Q114: Which of the theories of the social
Q116: Some proponents of corporate social responsibility argue
Q117: The theory of business social responsibility that
Q118: The Delaware Court system has adopted a
Q119: Which of the following actions is/are consistent
Q120: A business that is concerned solely with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents